Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 06:00 PM Feb 2014

Arizona Republican searching for example to justify anti-LGBTQ bill: Can I get back to you tomorrow?

When asked to cite a single example of religious discrimination, state Sen. Al Melvin asked for a 24 hour extension

KATIE MCDONOUGH

A longtime political adviser and two other members of Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s inner circle have said she will in all likelihood veto SB 1062, a measure that plays at corporate personhood and enables private businesses to discriminate against LGBTQ patrons.

Chuck Coughlin, Brewer’s longtime adviser, told NBC News, “It’s been her proclivity in the past to focus on the priorities she wants them [the legislature] to accomplish, and this was clearly not part of her agenda.”

Three state Republicans who voted for the measure have also expressed buyer’s remorse, telling the Arizona Republic that the fallout from the measure is causing the state “immeasurable harm.”

But not everyone thinks SB 1062 is an awful bill that will enshrine anti-LGBTQ discrimination into Arizona law (well, further enshrine anti-LGBTQ discrimination into Arizona law) and damage the state’s reputation and economy. Some people, like Republican state Sen. Al Melvin love the bill and think it’s really important — in theory, at least.

more
http://www.salon.com/2014/02/25/arizona_republican_searching_for_example_to_justify_anti_lgbtq_bill_can_i_get_back_to_you_tomorrow/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona Republican searching for example to justify anti-LGBTQ bill: Can I get back to you tomorrow? (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2014 OP
Their greatest minds will be put to the test... Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #1
I'm sure most Republicans... liberalmuse Feb 2014 #2
Exactly! It, should be well published. Apparently, initially, there was some language to that RKP5637 Feb 2014 #4
People often have long memories, just a veto will not make the bitterness of this go away, because RKP5637 Feb 2014 #3
Brewer needs to veto this law Gothmog Feb 2014 #5

liberalmuse

(18,671 posts)
2. I'm sure most Republicans...
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 06:19 PM
Feb 2014

are nostalgic about Jim Crow and the days when women couldn't vote, so fuck them. If they want to discriminate, they should also be required to put a sign in their windows and on their websites stating as such and let us all enjoy watching them sink to the bottom, like the dregs of humanity they are.

RKP5637

(67,088 posts)
4. Exactly! It, should be well published. Apparently, initially, there was some language to that
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 06:28 PM
Feb 2014

effect, but it was removed during the review processes. These people are both stupid and dangerous.

RKP5637

(67,088 posts)
3. People often have long memories, just a veto will not make the bitterness of this go away, because
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 06:25 PM
Feb 2014

it illustrates the type of people in the Arizona legislature and apparently a fair portion of the Arizona populace who elects them to office.

Many people don't want to do business with these types of individuals. Some will not believe this, but there is a lot of money that well might be deflected from Arizona by those with the capacity to do so. It might not make the headlines, but it will occur.

And, it goes far beyond gay ... one can substitute anything for gay to enable their favorite persecutions. ... but say gay.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arizona Republican search...