General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoman Denied Citizenship Because Objection To War Based On Secular, Not Religious, Values
By Travis Gettys
Friday, February 28, 2014 10:18 EST
A California woman applying for U.S. citizenship had her application denied because immigration officials refused to recognize her secular beliefs.
Adriana Ramirez claimed she objected to the pledge to bear arms due to her sincerely held moral convictions, but her conscientious objector status was rejected because it was not based on religious belief.
Attorneys from the American Humanist Association (AHA) said immigration officials violated constitutional protections in denying the application
Given the Supreme Courts unequivocal instruction that, to be consistent with the Constitution, the government must interpret a statute permitting conscientious objection on the basis of religious belief to include comparable secular moral views, wrote attorney Monica Miller, of AHA. Denying Ms. Ramirezs citizenship on the grounds that her secular moral beliefs are not religious is unconstitutional.
Miller said there was no legal basis to deny a citizenship to applicants because their ethical values are secular.
more...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/28/woman-denied-citizenship-because-objection-to-war-based-on-secular-not-religious-values/
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)struggle4progress
(118,275 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)That's a constitutional slam dunk!!!
elleng
(130,864 posts)First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Unfortunately, appeal necessary.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)enough
(13,256 posts)objection to war was based on religious beliefs. He went to prison, where he met a number of lifelong friends.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)While I believe that you shouldn't be granted citizenship in a country that you will never agree to defend, I don't believe a distinction should be made between secular and non-secular reasons.