General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussia Plans To Add Military Bases In Nicaragua, Venezuela, Other Countries
Russia appears to be expanding its military presence in numerous foreign countries like Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. The move could add more strain on Washington-Moscow relations.
A Russian military vessel already docked at a Havana naval base this week. According to Russias defense minister, Sergei Shogu, Moscow is looking to build military bases in Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, the Seychelles, Singapore and several other countries.
The placement of a Russian base in Nicaragua, in particular, is concerning to neighboring Costa Rica.
According to RIA Novosti, a Russian newspaper, Shoigu said that the defense ministry is close to signing the relevant documents with the listed countries.
Many have suggested that the move to put military bases in Asia and Latin America is meant as retaliation against the US: after the collapse of the Russian-backed Ukranian government last week, Russia may be making the point that it doesnt need or want the US meddling in its affairs.
MORE...
http://voxxi.com/2014/02/28/russia-adds-military-bases-latin-america/
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I was told Russia wasn't an imperial power!
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
malaise
(268,844 posts)who has bases in over 100 countries.
I actually like the idea of more than one superpower.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)all it's got is bombs
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Yes - big ones capable of reaching long distance targets.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)II. More than 1000 US Bases and/or Military Installations
The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g. C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.
In this regard, Hugh dAndrade and Bob Wings 2002 Map 1 entitled U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World, The Cost of Permanent War, confirms the presence of US military personnel in 156 countries.
The US Military has bases in 63 countries. Brand new military bases have been built since September 11, 2001 in seven countries.
Our tax dollars at work.
Who can blame them?
Agony
(2,605 posts)how can any US citizen blame them for trying to keep up with the Joneses.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)their (or those countries') interests.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)So, let's see, if they're putting a base in Vietnam, will they then be backing Vietnam's claims to their part of the South China Sea that falls inside that ludicrous Chinese nine-dot map (or ten dots now, I think)?
Russia putting a base in Vietnam is more of a problem for China than for the US.
Singapore - don't see it.
Nicaragua - Costa Rica has a point. CR doesn't even have an army.
Venezuela - eh whatevs. If the US were to try to topple Maduro, it would be from the inside, not with anything so crude as an aircraft carrier. But given that we want their oil and they want to sell it, whatever irritation the US feels is not enough to threaten that flow. If we no longer need their oil, then we won't care who runs the place anyway. So, eh whatevs.
Seychelles - wot? I think they're part of the British Commonwealth? Someone tell the Queen.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)would be pretty interesting.
But the question is, does Putin really have that much of a navy anymore?
Costa Rica really does have a point.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)that they would allow a ship repair and maintenance base. In exchange, Russia agreed to give Vietnam a $10 billion dollar u.s. loan with $8 billion going to helping it build a nuclear power station. Considering Obama just agreed to help Vietnam build a nuclear power facility, I'm thinking we're staying a step ahead of that one.
Russia in the past has had a base in Cam Rahn, but the Vietnamese government stated they had not agreed to a full base. I'm pretty sure Vietnam is playing this smart and negotiating a deal between Russia and the US to get the best deal for their country.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)NO ONE takes Russia seriously, except as a boring irritation.
Their moves in Syria are a desperate attempt to keep the only client they have left in the ME.
This Ukrainian stuff is an equally desperate attempt to keep Sevastopol in particular from being a problem.
They have a legit claim to Sevastopol and to Crimea. But the posts around here seem to want to promote Russia as some kind of world power. It's not. It's a backwater.
This status is entirely the fault of one person: Putin. The place has tremendous potential, but it won't be realized until it has a government that can be taken seriously. Putin's a clown who decided to blow up the importance of Russia's energy resources because it gave him a way to get a lot of power internally, and to stake a claim on the politics of places like the Ukraine. But as long as he does this sort of thing, no one is going to invest anything serious there, and it's going to stunt the country's internal development. It's a shame, because Russians are smart, courteous, gentle people who deserve way better.
The way to power is through prosperity, not the military. That it has big bombs impresses exactly no one. It's an irritant, nothing more.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Here we go again. CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS PART II on Deck.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Last I checked, the average Russian soldier was way overpaid and under-equipped...
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)in debt to other foreign entities/foes, i.e. China. as is the USA.
penultimate
(1,110 posts)but rather because it will just be used as a reason to pump more money into the military. It seems like there is some major consideration going into scaling down our military a little bit, but something like this could easily be used as proof to why we should expand and not contract.