General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis from the Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent at TIME. This is what he's up against.
Always. Bullshit like this.
@CrowleyTIME:
not a character judgment, but this does kind of capture the moment pic.twitter.com/aTTUVRLYqu
The photo:
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)problem anyway.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)In politics, perception and image are powerful tools.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)It's taking two irrelevant photos and putting them side-by-side as a comparison. It's not hard to grasp.
Why not put that photo next to this one?
That's right ... because it doesn't fit their narrative. Perception is what they create - not what it is. Obama is 'weak' because he wears a helmet. Putin is 'strong' because he walks around shirtless! Ridiculous. That supposed perception is schoolyard bullshit.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)That's the problem.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)So fuck Crowley.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)That's what the right's been trying to project of him since he became President. This just bolsters the claim. Don't do their work for 'em. Be objective. Just because Obama is not gung-ho on conflict doesn't mean he's an appeaser or weak.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)draw the conclusion that you're drawing
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Events and people? Bahahahhaa! Yeah. That never happens.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)as not being indicative of any kind of bias.
Rex
(65,616 posts)As a geek-cowboy hybrid myself, I have no problems with the picture. Putin in shades and no shirt is somewhat...blech...
OTOH, the POTUS is styling and profiling AND sporting safety conscience head gear! AND got a badass smile going on!
EAT THAT PUTIN! His horse looks tired btw.