Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:24 AM Mar 2014

Getty makes 35 million photos free to use

Getty Images, the world's largest photo agency, has made vast swathes of its library free to use, in an effort to combat piracy.

Millions of images - including famous shots of Marilyn Monroe and Barack Obama - will now be available without cost to blogs and social media sites.

The photos will be "framed" with a code that links back to Getty's website.

Getty said it had made the move after realising thousands of its images were being used without attribution.

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-26463886

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Getty makes 35 million photos free to use (Original Post) Earth_First Mar 2014 OP
The Getty Center is a national treasure. .. pipoman Mar 2014 #1
But Getty Images isn't related to it frazzled Mar 2014 #2
Mixed feelings. Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #3
No mixed feelings. As a photographer I can say this is complete shit. Ed Suspicious Mar 2014 #5
I feel you Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #6
Not public domain thesquanderer Mar 2014 #7
I'll admit. I made a comment without reading the article, but Boom Sound 416 Mar 2014 #8
"In essence, it is admitting defeat." jsr Mar 2014 #4
I wouldn't use them, frankly. MineralMan Mar 2014 #9
 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
3. Mixed feelings.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:53 AM
Mar 2014

Great to see more photos become Public Domain.

Sorry to see those photographers lose any residuals.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
6. I feel you
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 01:05 PM
Mar 2014

It's a real world out there that very few know about.

Spent some years in news gathering and made a lot of stills friends. (Except when I have to put sticks down )

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
7. Not public domain
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 01:18 PM
Mar 2014

"Free to use" is not the same as public domain.

They are also apparently limiting the free use to "blogs and social media site" and even then, they have certain requirements about the use:

" Images cannot be resized and they will all incorporate a Getty Images logo, as well as a credit for the photographer.

Like YouTube, the company may use the code to serve advertisements in the future, allowing it to make revenue by sharing its catalogue."

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
8. I'll admit. I made a comment without reading the article, but
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 01:27 PM
Mar 2014

Now that I've read the article, my opinion remains the same for now, as it seems the move has very little to do with ensuring and protecting residuals.

Do I have that right? (My cynicism gets the better of me sometimes)

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
9. I wouldn't use them, frankly.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 02:08 PM
Mar 2014

I don't like depending on some other website to serve images. There's always a delay, which can't be determined, and may be long, depending on Internet Traffic and bandwidth availability.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Getty makes 35 million ph...