Conservatives in the U.S. would be considered something like fascists in other western democracies, while what is called "liberal" in the U.S. is aligned with "conservative" in other western democracies.
So, by saying we need conservatism as it exists in the U.S. means you're saying we need a fascist-minded political party here.
I entirely disagree.
Obama himself has admitted he would be considered a moderate Republican in the 1980s.
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/domestic-taxes/272957-obama-says-his-economic-policies-so-mainstream-hed-be-seen-as-moderate-republican-in-1980s
So, in this nation you have liberals and more left than liberal citizens who have a choice of voting for an ideology that aligns with Republicanism or Christofascists (because the Republican Party has been co-opted by the most IGNORANT members of this society until it really bears little to no resemblance to the Republican Party since the 1950s. In the 1950s, the President of this nation, a Republican, was more open to govt. investment than some Democrats, and more than any Republican.
This nation has a long, long history of flirtation with fascism.
That's not a political stance I want to see represented in the U.S.
On the other hand, it's impossible for an actual liberal to win the nomination for a democrat because of this ignorant, knee-jerk, fundamentalist stupidity that is supported in this nation by the politicians who cater to them and who are complicit in making this nation an embarrassment.
This nation is more liberal than either party realizes, and certainly more than either party governs.
http://www.democracyjournal.org/arguments/2013/09/politicians-think-american-voters-are-more-conservative-than-they-really-are.php
When we compare what legislators believe their constituents want to their constituents’ actual views, we discover that politicians hold remarkably inaccurate perceptions. Pick an American state legislator at random, and chances are that he or she will have massive misperceptions about district views on big-ticket issues, typically missing the mark by 15 percentage points.
What is more, the mistakes legislators make tend to fall in one direction, giving U.S. politics a rightward tilt compared to what most voters say they want. As the following figures show, legislators usually believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. Our attitude measurements are most accurate on the questions about same sex marriage and universal health insurance – and in both instances the legislators’ guesses about their constituents’ views were 15-20 percent more conservative, on average, than the true public support for same-sex marriage or universal health care present in their districts.
Our study also found that politicians don’t learn in the normal course of events. After November 2012, we posed the same questions again to some candidates. Even after conducting campaigns and seeing the results, politicians did not arrive at more accurate perceptions of constituent views—not even those who had spent more time talking to voters. Much remains to be learned about why U.S. legislators think constituents are more conservative than they truly are, but researchers have found that politically active citizens tend to be wealthier and more conservative than others. Politicians who want to represent all the people in their districts need to keep this in mind.
Just another way our government is not really representative of its citizens at all.
= new reply since forum marked as read
