Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums3 separate issues: CIA/NSA overreach, Metadata/Spying, and Snowden
These issues are being lumped together inappropriately.
1. CIA/NSA overreach is not OK. They need to follow the law and report their activities TRUTHFULLY to Congress.
2. Metadata/spying. This is a legal issue. If they are allowed to do it, then fine. I'm not for it, but I'm not actively against it. Frankly Google and others have way more of our private data than the government at this point.
3. Snowden. Where and how does he fit in? Did he report something that was not already known? Is he just a stimulus that caused the CIA/NSA to lie under oath?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 521 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3 separate issues: CIA/NSA overreach, Metadata/Spying, and Snowden (Original Post)
apples and oranges
Mar 2014
OP
Romulox
(25,960 posts)1. Nonsense. Each of these issues folds into the next. nt
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)2. apples and authoritarians
2. Metadata/spying. This is a legal issue. If they are allowed to do it, then fine. I'm not for it, but I'm not actively against it. Frankly Google and others have way more of our private data than the government at this point.
Google, et al, have a LOT of information. I still think that what the NSA holds can be much more damaging to citizens. They are not limited to one slice of network traffic. Even google just has google's slice of traffic. The 4th amendment still exists.
Both data mining issues are wrong imo and should be abolished and criminalized.
Autumn
(45,041 posts)3. I've seen them compared but not lumped together.
As for the rest, if we knew more, and there are politicians trying to tell us that what we have found out is only the tip of the iceberg, I think we would see that it's all entwined.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)4. You are missing an important point.
2. Metadata/spying. This is a legal issue. If they are allowed to do it, then fine. I'm not for it, but I'm not actively against it. Frankly Google and others have way more of our private data than the government at this point.
Google doesn't have an extensive network of law enforcement and espionage agencies, empowered to detain, arrest, imprison, deport, torture and kill, that can act on the data they gather. Google represents a vastly smaller threat to our freedom than the U.S. government.