Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:45 PM Mar 2014

875,000 names on the 'watch list'

The U.S. government's “massive” watchlist database risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people as known or suspected terrorists – including some its own citizens, a leading civil liberties group has warned.

Around 875,000 names are believed to be on the list, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said. Many are included "based on information that is often stale, poorly reviewed, or of questionable reliability," it added in a report published Friday. Moreover people are being put onto the watch list based on secret evidence and secret standards, with no meaningful process to challenge mistakes, the ACLU warned.

The consolidated Terrorist Watchlist was created in 2003, in part a response to the 9/11 attacks. It provides for a single database of identifying information on individuals suspected by the US to be potentially involved in terrorist activity.

The U.S. government has said the database is “one of the most effective counterterrorism tools for the U.S. government." But the report highlights the negative consequences for anyone finding themselves on the list. It states that traveling by air or sea can become more difficult – and individuals on the list are often subjected to invasive screening, denial of visas, detention and questioning.

Redress procedures for those who have been wrongly or mistakenly included on the list are inadequate, the ACLU said, and can result in innocent people languishing on the list without any real way to challenge their status, according to the ACLU.

What's more, the lists are "shared widely within the federal government, with state and local law enforcement agencies, and even with foreign governments," the ACLU said in a press release.


http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/3/15/aclu-us-terror-watchlistrisksstigmatizinginnocentamericancitizen.html





Of course no metadata was used to decide who was on the watchlist

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
875,000 names on the 'watch list' (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 OP
Don't worry, some government fan will be along to tell you that you are wrong Rex Mar 2014 #1
How is anyone a fan of government? bigwillq Mar 2014 #7
"Government isn't the solution to the problem. hfojvt Mar 2014 #27
It would be very interesting to see the names on that list. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #2
And remember, Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #3
History has proven that. - Over, and over, and over. We are always urged to trust our "leaders". Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #4
This is a shameless outrage, bvar22 Mar 2014 #5
You know who loves lists? 1000words Mar 2014 #6
No Shit. jsr Mar 2014 #9
Statisticians Progressive dog Mar 2014 #11
And Santa Claus. nt awoke_in_2003 Mar 2014 #21
875,000 people... Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2014 #8
Statistically speaking? Using what statistic?? MNBrewer Mar 2014 #13
Mathmatically speaking? Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2014 #15
Percentages. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #26
0.27% of the population MNBrewer Mar 2014 #30
You asked which statistics. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #31
Right wing nutjobs probably aren't listed, but I agree with your pointing out their danger. MNBrewer Mar 2014 #32
Thats more than AN NFL stadium can hold... yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #14
That's an odd comparison. That number is also less than functioning_cog Mar 2014 #23
Exactly. Less than people out of every 1000. functioning_cog Mar 2014 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2014 #10
Makes me feel safe! progressoid Mar 2014 #12
Anything about this ACLU report in your MSM? Ghost Dog Mar 2014 #16
What are they to do then? treestar Mar 2014 #17
Now why would they do that? Octafish Mar 2014 #18
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2014 #19
That list should be leaked. JEB Mar 2014 #20
So less than 0.3% of US population functioning_cog Mar 2014 #22
Halliburton has homes away from home waitin'... Octafish Mar 2014 #25
Secret lists, secret laws, secret courts, woo me with science Mar 2014 #28
Dana Priest & William Arkin's Top Secret America was published in 2011, they cited higher figures bobthedrummer Mar 2014 #29
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #33
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. Don't worry, some government fan will be along to tell you that you are wrong
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:49 PM
Mar 2014

and that the NSA is harmless. So go ahead and start feeling better now...that way you don't have to wait!

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
7. How is anyone a fan of government?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:48 PM
Mar 2014


Our government is screwing us all over.

If one doesn't believe that, THEIR HEAD IS SO FAR BURIED UNDER THE SAND.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
27. "Government isn't the solution to the problem.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:40 PM
Mar 2014

Government IS the problem." Ronald Reagan

"The scariest words in the English language 'I am from the government and I am here to help.'" Ronald Reagan

I use that last line a lot, since I work for the city government.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
2. It would be very interesting to see the names on that list.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:53 PM
Mar 2014

Of course, the list is kept secret for our own security....or something.

Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
3. And remember,
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:03 PM
Mar 2014

where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that.

Lord Acton


 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
4. History has proven that. - Over, and over, and over. We are always urged to trust our "leaders".
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:08 PM
Mar 2014
The shepherd always tries to persuade the sheep that their interests and his own are the same. Marie Beyle (Stendahl)

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
5. This is a shameless outrage,
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 03:40 PM
Mar 2014

...brought to you by our ever-expanding Surveillance/Security State,
but don't worry!
Big Brother LOVES you,
and only wants what is best for YOU!

Besides, if you have nothing to hide, my dear,
you have nothing to fear.
Trust Me.
Would General Clapper LIE to you?

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
8. 875,000 people...
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 04:06 PM
Mar 2014

If that were ONLY American citizens, that would be about 0.27% of the population. That's not a very high number, statistically speaking.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
30. 0.27% of the population
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 04:19 PM
Mar 2014

It might be descriptive, but it's certainly not meaningful.

Not a very high percentage? If we're talking about people who poop at least once a day it's pretty low.

However, this is a list of people who are considered possible terrorists, isn't it?

0.27% on a "watch list" seems fairly high to me. That's 27 in 10,000 people on the watch list. That means that about 1,000 people from my home in Minneapolis are on this watch list, if not more.

My guess is that way WAY fewer than 1000 people in Minneapolis have a terroristic viewpoint, although there are some who do, e.g., the Somali men who head off to fight with al-Shebab.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
31. You asked which statistics.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 04:39 PM
Mar 2014

I told you which statistic was being used.

A percentage, is a statistic.

As for whether its a meaningful statistic, clearly, just based on your reaction, it is.

And I wonder how many right wing whack jobs live in Minneapolis. I wouldn't be surprised to find that a city that size had 1,000 such nuts in it. There's been an increase in right wing hate groups in recent years.

As luck would have it, there is an article on such groups out today.
https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/03/08


yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts)
14. Thats more than AN NFL stadium can hold...
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 04:34 PM
Mar 2014

85,000 seats. FED EX stadium is the largest.


edited to note:
The Great Strahov Stadium (Czech: Velký strahovský stadion) is a stadium in the Strahov district of Prague, Czech Republic. With a capacity of around 250,000, it is the largest stadium in the world, and the second largest sports facility worldwide after the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
16. Anything about this ACLU report in your MSM?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:09 PM
Mar 2014

... There is a lengthy article here, from yesterday, as well as at aljazeera as quoted in the OP...

treestar

(82,383 posts)
17. What are they to do then?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:11 PM
Mar 2014

Are there any suggestions for making a better watch list? Or are we to do without that?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
18. Now why would they do that?
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 05:17 PM
Mar 2014
The Last Gasp of American Democracy

By Chris Hedges
TruthDig.org, Posted on Jan 5, 2014

EXCERPT...

The most radical evil, as Hannah Arendt pointed out, is the political system that effectively crushes its marginalized and harassed opponents and, through fear and the obliteration of privacy, incapacitates everyone else. Our system of mass surveillance is the machine by which this radical evil will be activated. If we do not immediately dismantle the security and surveillance apparatus, there will be no investigative journalism or judicial oversight to address abuse of power. There will be no organized dissent. There will be no independent thought. Criticisms, however tepid, will be treated as acts of subversion. And the security apparatus will blanket the body politic like black mold until even the banal and ridiculous become concerns of national security.

I saw evil of this kind as a reporter in the Stasi state of East Germany. I was followed by men, invariably with crew cuts and wearing leather jackets, whom I presumed to be agents of the Stasi—the Ministry for State Security, which the ruling Communist Party described as the “shield and sword” of the nation. People I interviewed were visited by Stasi agents soon after I left their homes. My phone was bugged. Some of those I worked with were pressured to become informants. Fear hung like icicles over every conversation.

The Stasi did not set up massive death camps and gulags. It did not have to. The Stasi, with a network of as many as 2 million informants in a country of 17 million, was everywhere. There were 102,000 secret police officers employed full time to monitor the population—one for every 166 East Germans. The Nazis broke bones; the Stasi broke souls. The East German government pioneered the psychological deconstruction that torturers and interrogators in America’s black sites, and within our prison system, have honed to a gruesome perfection.

[font color="green"]The goal of wholesale surveillance, as Arendt wrote in “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” is not, in the end, to discover crimes, “but to be on hand when the government decides to arrest a certain category of the population.” And because Americans’ emails, phone conversations, Web searches and geographical movements are recorded and stored in perpetuity in government databases, there will be more than enough “evidence” to seize us should the state deem it necessary. This information waits like a deadly virus inside government vaults to be turned against us. It does not matter how trivial or innocent that information is. In totalitarian states, justice, like truth, is irrelevant. [/font green]

The object of efficient totalitarian states, as George Orwell understood, is to create a climate in which people do not think of rebelling, a climate in which government killing and torture are used against only a handful of unmanageable renegades. The totalitarian state achieves this control, Arendt wrote, by systematically crushing human spontaneity, and by extension human freedom. It ceaselessly peddles fear to keep a population traumatized and immobilized. It turns the courts, along with legislative bodies, into mechanisms to legalize the crimes of state.

CONTINUED...

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_last_gasp_of_american_democracy_20140105

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
25. Halliburton has homes away from home waitin'...
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:20 PM
Mar 2014

KBR, the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton Co. /quotes/zigman/228631/quotes/nls/hal HAL -.00% , said Tuesday it has been awarded a contingency contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supports its Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the event of an emergency. The maximum total value of the contract is $385 million and consists of a 1-year base period with four 1-year options. KBR held the previous ICE contract from 2000 through 2005. The contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs, KBR said. The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster, the company said.

CONTINUED...

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/kbr-awarded-homeland-security-contract-worth-up-to-385m

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
28. Secret lists, secret laws, secret courts,
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 02:43 PM
Mar 2014

secret government.

Anyone who tries to tell you this is acceptable is not working on your behalf.
 

bobthedrummer

(26,083 posts)
29. Dana Priest & William Arkin's Top Secret America was published in 2011, they cited higher figures
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 03:02 PM
Mar 2014

and all this was before the release of some of the Snowden data which we know exponentially ups all these "lists", some of which I'm been on since the early to mid-60's when a minor.

Fwiw, they last a lifetime and include extended family and social networks. Be that as it may here are but a few of the latest "threats" which now are covered by the so called "cyber threat" shield.

US military (Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cyber_Command

FBI
Guardian Threat Tracking System (SourceWatch)
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Guardian_Threat_Tracking_System

FBI launches cyber threat info-sharing platform (Amber Corrin 7-30-13 FCW)
http://www.fcw.com/articles/2013/07/30/fbi-information-sharing.aspx

The absolutely worst lists to be on are those of the private sector contractors, groups and individuals imo and experience. It literally is open season with them, forever.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»875,000 names on the 'wa...