Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCellphone spying technology being used throughout Northern California
http://www.news10.net/story/news/investigations/watchdog/2014/03/06/cellphone-spying-technology-used-throughout-northern-california/6144949/Michael Bott, and Thom Jensen, News10 2:25 a.m. EST March 7, 2014
At least seven law enforcement agencies in California are using controversial technology that allows them to secretly collect data from cellphones and track people, News10 has learned.
Hundreds of pages of documents, from grant applications to purchase orders, show that the technology has been here for years and it's been used in dozens of arrests. In Oakland, a device called a StingRay allows police to track people and collect real-time data from every cell phone within a certain radius. The city's Targeted Enforcement Task Force II used a Stingray to make 19 arrests in 2009, according to an Oakland Police Criminal Investigation Division report.
StingRays are being paid for mostly by Homeland Security grant money distributed by the California Emergency Management Agency, under programs such as the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) or the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP). Grant applications from several agencies show local law enforcement are justifying the purchase of StingRay technology as an anti-terrorism tool, but it's being used to apprehend and prosecute suspects in routine crimes, from robberies to homicides.
None of the 19 arrests made using the StingRay in Oakland in 2009 were related to terrorism.
At least seven law enforcement agencies in California are using controversial technology that allows them to secretly collect data from cellphones and track people, News10 has learned.
Hundreds of pages of documents, from grant applications to purchase orders, show that the technology has been here for years and it's been used in dozens of arrests. In Oakland, a device called a StingRay allows police to track people and collect real-time data from every cell phone within a certain radius. The city's Targeted Enforcement Task Force II used a Stingray to make 19 arrests in 2009, according to an Oakland Police Criminal Investigation Division report.
StingRays are being paid for mostly by Homeland Security grant money distributed by the California Emergency Management Agency, under programs such as the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) or the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP). Grant applications from several agencies show local law enforcement are justifying the purchase of StingRay technology as an anti-terrorism tool, but it's being used to apprehend and prosecute suspects in routine crimes, from robberies to homicides.
None of the 19 arrests made using the StingRay in Oakland in 2009 were related to terrorism.
Added on edit: A spokesperson for the Electronic Frontier Foundation says that StingRays can also capture
the content of phone calls:
http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2014/03/13/129328/
...Can you start off by explaining more about what kind of information the StingRay can gather? Can it eavesdrop on actual conversations?
It can capture conversation. There have been some assurances that these specific sorts of StingRays being used by local law enforcement arent doing that, but we do know that they have the capability of doing so.
They also have the capability of capturing the metadata or the information about how you communicate. And in these specific instances of local law enforcement using them, theyre using that information to pinpoint the persons location.
Its my understanding that this technology is being used by some law enforcement without a warrant. An Oakland Police Department spokesperson told me in an email that prior to 2009 no warrant was required but that now, depending on how its being used, a search warrant may or may not be required. Whats your understanding of how often warrants are being obtained?
Thats a big question mark because theres a lot of secrecy surrounding the use of these devices. Im not quite sure why the shift in 2009, and Im encouraged that they claim they are using search warrants today, but I will note that there has been some concern revealed through public records requests that the ACLU of Northern California did, that some federal court officials, some federal judges, were concerned that law enforcement requesting orders to use these devices werent being completely forthright with the judges. That they were in fact using StingRays to get some of this information. And so, again, theres a lot of uncertainty about it. They certainly should be using a search warrant, because these devices capture very rich, detailed and intimate information about a persons location and how they communicate and who they communicate with, and also have the capability to catch the actual content of conversation
It can capture conversation. There have been some assurances that these specific sorts of StingRays being used by local law enforcement arent doing that, but we do know that they have the capability of doing so.
They also have the capability of capturing the metadata or the information about how you communicate. And in these specific instances of local law enforcement using them, theyre using that information to pinpoint the persons location.
Its my understanding that this technology is being used by some law enforcement without a warrant. An Oakland Police Department spokesperson told me in an email that prior to 2009 no warrant was required but that now, depending on how its being used, a search warrant may or may not be required. Whats your understanding of how often warrants are being obtained?
Thats a big question mark because theres a lot of secrecy surrounding the use of these devices. Im not quite sure why the shift in 2009, and Im encouraged that they claim they are using search warrants today, but I will note that there has been some concern revealed through public records requests that the ACLU of Northern California did, that some federal court officials, some federal judges, were concerned that law enforcement requesting orders to use these devices werent being completely forthright with the judges. That they were in fact using StingRays to get some of this information. And so, again, theres a lot of uncertainty about it. They certainly should be using a search warrant, because these devices capture very rich, detailed and intimate information about a persons location and how they communicate and who they communicate with, and also have the capability to catch the actual content of conversation
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1135 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cellphone spying technology being used throughout Northern California (Original Post)
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
OP
Moral of the story, don't use communication devices. Don't send txt messages,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2014
#1
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1. Moral of the story, don't use communication devices. Don't send txt messages,
Data information or make phone calls.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)2. ^
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)3. This is referred to
in the book Dragnet Nation.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-hi-tech-police-surveillance-the-stingray-cell-phone-spying-device/5331165