General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's say you're a governor or president, and there's a scandal in your administration.
Note: This is purely hypothetical; it's unrelated to any political scandal in real life.
Say someone in your administration embezzles millions of dollars from the governmental budget, accepts huge bribes or kickbacks, or commits some flagrant abuse of power, or causes some other scandal.
As governor or president, you did not know about this, there's nothing you could have done about it, and you 100% oppose it. But it's too late.
What do you do?
If you proclaim, "I had nothing to do with this and knew nothing of this' - well, you look guilty. The public and media would say, "That;'s what every politician in a scandal says!"
If you fire the culprit and crack down hard, then you look like someone who is trying very hard to cast blame and distance yourself - which makes you look guilty.
If you take responsibility for what happened, even though it wasn't your fault, then the media and public will think you were part of the scandal.
What would you do?
Separation
(1,975 posts)Or drone somebody. Misdirection, it's not just for Vegas magic shows anymore.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Take responsibility on those terms to the public, go after the guilty parties, and take what comes of it.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)the governor, president, whoever absolutely should have had some clue here. I recognize that you're making the not knowing an essential condition of the scandal, but it comes down to the political leader should have known and needs to take responsibility, even if he could not possibly have known. It's a clear case of "The buck stops here."
Unfortunately, we do not have a tradition of honorable resignation from office under such circumstances. We should have. Instead we have a tradition of being above the fray, which too often has come to mean above the law.
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)Plus, bribery, fraud and embezzlement are usually kept secret for the purpose of being........hard to detect.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)first of all start out by making it very clear that such behavior will not be tolerated, and then follow up. Or, depending on the specific thing that happens, resign.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Just like Fat Bastard did.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Let the investigation run its course.
There's not much one can do without complications.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)of someone in my administration. Suggest there are "powerful forces, some within the government" that will stop at nothing to prevent me from implementing my agenda (being as vague as possible as to which particular part of my agenda is so objectionable), appear to stick by the guilty party while also secretly asking them to resign, and find something foreign policy related to distract people from the topic as much as possible.