General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Right's Crusade to Repeal the 20th Century
http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/rights-crusade-repeal-20th-centurySalon / By Joan Walsh
The Right's Crusade to Repeal the 20th Century
Opposing the minimum wage, overtime pay, even child labor laws, the GOP is trying to make it easier to exploit workers.
snip//
The presidents policies are in fact making it harder for employers to exploit their workers. Thats all. As Jared Bernstein told the New York Times. I think a potential side effect is that you may see more hiring in order to avoid overtime costs, which would be an awfully good thing right about now."
Or youll see higher wages, which would also be an awfully good thing. One of the major causes of rising income inequality is that back in the 1970s, rising productivity suddenly became detached from rising wages. For decades since the labor-rights reforms and social welfare advances of the 30s and 40s the two lines climbed in tandem, with higher productivity translating into higher paychecks. The two came apart, in whats become known as the great divergence, at the same time as income inequality began to climb. There are many reasons for the productivity-wage split, including a stagnant minimum wage, declining union membership, and weaker labor rights overall including less compensated overtime.
Republicans no longer accept that it was government intervention in the economy, first in the Progressive era and then, more forcefully, after the Great Depression, that created the greatest economic boom and the biggest middle class in history. The 40-hour work week. The weekend. Vacations. Child labor laws. The minimum wage. Social Security. Health and safety protection. All of these represented government intervention on the side of working people, to balance the playing field with exploitive employers, and to carve out a realm of family and personal life that could be protected from ceaseless labor. Progressive public policy essentially created childhood, as a time when kids who werent wealthy might be educated and protected from labor abuse.
These became bipartisan values, with some debating around the margins, through Richard Nixons administration. But then a pro-business backlash put all of those gains back on the table. Republicans are now trying to repeal the 20th century.
The federal government, in particular, shouldnt be involved in labor markets in any way, shape or form, says Jeffrey Miron, economic studies director at the Cato Institute. Cato is a libertarian think tank, but Mirons once-radical point of view is now the GOP mainstream.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)K & R
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)unfortunately, they're almost there.
underpants
(182,778 posts)Warpy
(111,249 posts)and have always loudly trumpeted that it was WWII that ended the Depression. I see people here on DU mouthing that lie again and again, so they've gotten that message out.
The bulk of the New Deal, the jobs program, only had four years before conservatives in Congress forced an end to it, causing the Great Recession of 1937. That Great Recession, combined with their aversion to full employment at living wages, was what needed a war to end it.
Conservatives started the Depression and conservatives forced an end to the programs that were ending it prematurely.
If you've ever wondered why they squander money on the Pentagon while people in this country can't find jobs and have jobs that don't feed them, that's why. It's their Biggest Lie.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Depression. IMO it does not matter what the government spends the money on from the prospect of ending a depression. What does matter and we need to pay attention to this today is what the return from the spending is.
For example when we spend money on new weapons and they do not get used then they just set there. On the other hand if we would spend the money on alternative energies they would be used and add to the economy. That is why war spending does not work today - we get nothing back from it.
If we had used the money from all these middle east wars to build alternative energy sources we would be far ahead because these sources would still be paying off long after the middle east oil runs out.
malaise
(268,949 posts)Rec
Brigid
(17,621 posts)And he would be horrified that it is his party that's doing it. He warned the rich of his Tims that there was going to be an explosion if the inequality of that era continued, and he was right. If he were to come back today, he would think we still don't get it; and he would definitely be looking to pound a few people.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)tooeyeten
(1,074 posts)Are happy to oblige against their own self-interest, and the policies that made them the middle class.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Just sayin'.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Maybe something like the Old Soviet Union... ?? Disgusting in any event.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Tiny pockets of immense wealth surrounded by grinding poverty. Of course Republican voters all *think* they'll be in the enclaves....
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)Benjamin Franklin fought for the establishment of public libraries; Bobby Jindal in Louisiana is closing them. Publicly funded schools were established soon after the American Revolution; Republicans across the country are on a crusade to replace public schools with charter and religious schools.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)would have happened without a strong union force. Government just reacted to labor, because they had no choice.
africanadian
(92 posts)Great title!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And employs the other half who are lazy, shiftless time card punching losers.
There are a whole lot fewer bosses than workers.
lindysalsagal
(20,678 posts)The GOP is entirely 9th century.