Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

michello

(132 posts)
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:54 PM Mar 2014

Michigan Short-Changed Detroit By Millions

This is one way to kill a city -- short its tax revenue by millions. On purpose.

MLive:

Michigan communities have missed out on some $6.2 billion in statutory revenue sharing payments over the past decade as lawmakers and governors diverted funds to fill holes in the state budget, according to a new report from the Michigan Municipal League highlighting losses by community.

Detroit, the state's largest city, lost out on $732 million in revenue sharing between 2003 and 2013, according to the report. Twenty two other cities -- from Grand Rapids to Wyandotte -- saw the state divert at least $10 million in sales tax revenue that local leaders believe they should have been entitled to.

[...]

However, local leaders say the state has not honored a statutory provision (see: law) that requires it to appropriate additional sales tax dollars to communities based on a standard formula. Over the course of the past decade, those "raids" have added up.

“You can look at pretty much any Michigan community and see where they might be today if the statutory revenue sharing had been fully funded,” Samantha Harkins of the Municipal League said in a statement.

“For example, look at Flint, which is now under an emergency manager. Flint will have lost $54.9 million dollars by the end of 2014. The deficit in its 2012 financial statements is $19.2 million. Flint could eliminate the deficit and pay off all $30 million of bonded indebtedness and still have over $5 million in surplus. In Detroit, a city facing the largest municipal bankruptcy in history, the state took over $700 million to balance the state’s books.”

Over $700 million. Think of what Detroit could have done with that money. Investments in the city could have been made that would have attracted more business. Instead they cut back on every service there was, closed schools, and effectively closed shop while the state balanced its books on the backs of desperate cities there.

Pathetic management. I don't care who is responsible, Republican or Democrat. There's no excuse for a state failing to abide by its own laws.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/03/michigan-short-changed-detroit-millions

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan Short-Changed Detroit By Millions (Original Post) michello Mar 2014 OP
Yeah, ten years of revenue sharing cut off EC Mar 2014 #1

EC

(12,287 posts)
1. Yeah, ten years of revenue sharing cut off
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:05 PM
Mar 2014

that'll do it. I've noticed it happening in some of these other states that Republicans got control of. I don't know if Granholm did this or if she was stuck with a Republican Congress that could override a veto...I sure hope Granholm didn't make this decision.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michigan Short-Changed De...