Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy We Should Be Suspicious of the Libertarian Right's Newfound Concern for Prison Reform
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/decriminalization-not-reform-why-libertarian-prison-reforms-only-aid-and-abetLike many criminal justice and drug policy reformers I have watched with great interest the growing bi-partisan support among elected officials for addressing mass incarceration. Much of this new-found interest is due in part to Michelle Alexanders well-received book, "The New Jim Crow," which elevated concerns about mass incarceration and its relationship to the war on drugs in African American and liberal communities. Response to "The New Jim Crow" is part of a broad cultural shift in discussion of drugs and criminal justice policies, reflected in the popularity of shows like "Breaking Bad" and "Weeds," documentary films like "The House I Live In" and growing national acceptance of marijuana legalization. As someone who has spent the past 15 years advocating for reform of our criminal justice system and the end of punitive drug prohibition these developments should fill me with hope and optimism, instead I am filled with skepticism and great trepidation for the future.
It seems Im not the only one who views these developments with a sense of unease. In Prison Cultures recent website article, Prison Reforms In Vogue & Other Strange Things, the author starts by noting the widespread optimism among journalists and others over the prospects for criminal justice reform and then goes on to express skepticism about the legitimacy of the development by citing history. The modern penal institution is a product of an earlier reform movement, which sought to replace physical torture and punishment with a system that would encourage quiet reflection, penance and rehabilitation. The author references a seminal report titled, Struggle for Justice, published decades ago, which put it this way:
More judges and more experts for the courts, improved educational and therapeutic programs in penal institutions, more and better trained personnel at higher salaries, preventive surveillance of predelinquent children, greater use of probation, careful classification of inmates, preventive detention through indeterminate sentences, small cottage institutions, halfway houses, removal of broad classes of criminals (such as juveniles) from criminal and nonpunitive processes, the use of lay personnel in treatment all this paraphernalia of the new criminology appears over and over in nineteenth-century reformist literature.
Sound familiar? Struggle for Justice was published in 1971 and was referencing reforms from the previous century. As the authors astutely observed, many reforms were merely changes in semantics: Call them community treatment centers or what you will, if human beings are involuntarily confined in them, they are prisons. Everything being proposed to reform the criminal justice system by state and federal legislators today are reconfigurations of things weve done before with varying degrees of success.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 412 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post