General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis New Hyundai Car Runs On The Poop Of California Residents, And The Fuel Is Free.
With hydrogen supplied by Orange County's sewage treatment plant and paid for by the car manufacturer, a new fuel cell vehicle is actually hitting the market in Los Angeles.
Adele Peters March 18, 2014
A new car from Hyundai runs on a fuel that has a truly endless supply: human poop.
Hydrogen created from sewage at a waste treatment plant in Orange County, California, will power fuel cells in the Hyundai Tuscon, available for leasing later this spring in a limited area around Los Angeles.
Right now, there are only about 10 hydrogen fuel pumps in the entire state, and most are supplied with hydrogen thats made from natural gas. But the Orange County Sanitation District is testing out new technology that can make hydrogen cheaply by processing solid waste and feeding it to microbes that turn it into methane. The fuel will be pumped to local stations, making it possible for Hyundai to put its car on the streets.
For now, its only going to be available in the immediate area. We want to make sure with this car that customers have pretty easy access to hydrogen, says Jim Trainor, a spokesperson for Hyundai. If there were more hydrogen stations, we could have more customers. Well plan more when the infrastructures in place.
Full Story:
http://www.fastcoexist.com/3027144/this-new-hyundai-car-runs-on-the-poop-of-california-residents-and-the-fuel-is-free
Turbineguy
(37,285 posts)run fast.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)pipi_k
(21,020 posts)and light a match.
Kapow! You're on vacation in the Caribbean...
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)mackerel
(4,412 posts)P.S. There's a good joke in there.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)It's time some enterprising companies started using the kind of renewable fuel we have an endless supply of.
Initech
(100,034 posts)"Hi I'm Robin Williams. The shit hit the fan and it's powering my car! I just ate a huge burrito and now I'm about to go for a drive in my new shit powered Ford Fiesta. Fuck green, go brown!"
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Ferretherder
(1,445 posts)...with a car that runs on the noxious fumes generated by an endless supply of crap, the republicans will be looking at us in their rear-view mirrors!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Ferretherder
(1,445 posts)I 100% agree!
classykaren
(769 posts)Thav
(946 posts)hog confinement manure pits. Now there's an excellent supply.
Javaman
(62,500 posts)sounds like repuke supporters.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)crappy ride.
valerief
(53,235 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)LTR
(13,227 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)No smog, no Nitrous Oxides no smog checks no problems
10 eco friendly ways to generate hydrogen from water
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Truly green when they figure out that Hydrogen can be made from Solar Energy
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)My bold. So they still have to get hydrogen out of the methane (CH4) and how do they do that? What are the waste products? Once they have the hydrogen, great!--but what happens before that? 'Cause methane itself isn't exactly a good thing, being a greenhouse gas 20x worse than CO2.
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)Very common industrial process. Here is a link to the techie bits.
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/chen1/
Kilgore
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)from your link: "...Unfortunately, the production of hydrogen using steam reforming of natural gas does not eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. However, the carbon dioxide release is in fact lower for fuel cell vehicles powered by natural gas when comparing to those powered by gasoline."
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)natural gas is not the source of the methane. Poop gas is biologically sourced.
Seems strange to be posting about poop gas.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)It's a step to a Hydrogen powered world.
Can't expect total change overnight. Or so I'm repeatedly told.
The car doesn't emit smog, so that's a positive.
Next step:
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
LTR
(13,227 posts)dembotoz
(16,785 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)go poop car!
drynberg
(1,648 posts)Is Ford, GM, Chrysler, Honda, Toyota, etc. far "behind" in getting the Gas Passers on the Road? It's like getting back real change from a wooden nickel! Surely Sustainable, no?
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Toyota: Hydrogen cars have edge on electric cars
And there's this about electric only:
Electric cars can go only half as far in freezing weather, AAA finds. The average EV battery range in AAAs test was 105 miles at 75 degrees but dropped 57% to just 43 miles at 20 degrees
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-aaa-electric-vehicle-range-20140320,0,3522803.story#ixzz2wWphMXOq
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)You do have to heat the cabin and run the fans and that takes energy that otherwise could go to the motors. The problem with EVs is that PLUS the fact that batteries just don't work as well in the cold
The 3-minute refill time is a huge advantage over EVs (assuming of course there will be infrastructure for either, which doesn't really exist now for either EV or fuel cell).
Also, unlike pure EVs, fuel cells can scale effectively, at least up to mid-sized trucks. There is no battery technology on the horizon that would allow an EV garbage truck, for example, unless there were curbside recharge stations along the route. But you can't have trucks idle like that. There is a company making a curbside recharging system for city buses. That's brilliant because bus routes are designed with frequent stops anyway.
If we want to look at the transportation picture of 2020, here's what we could see:
Small city cars, still mostly gas engine because that is cheap, efficient and convenient. But EVs and fuel cells combined could get 20% of that market if they can get to a reasonable price point ($30K with 80 mile range) and have a massive build-out of infrastructure. 2- or 3-cylinder gas engine with light hybrid can get close to 100 MPG, making EVs irrelevant to most people.
Primary cars (full size cars, crossovers, 5 seats, used for commutes and weekend trips, etc). Hybrids will still dominate, including EVs with range extenders (e.g. Chevy Volt and BMW I3). EVs will be a tiny niche because the pricing and convenience just won't be there for most people. EVs under 5% of the market. Fuel cells could be a player more than 5%, but limited by hydrogen infrastructure. Fuel cell could grow to 33% of the market in the 2020s, but will probably still be under 5% by 2020. Fuel cells won't be cheap and hydrogen won't necessarily be cheap either.
Work vehicles (pick-up trucks, cargo vans, etc) Will still be dominated by gas and Diesel engines, but we should see more hybrid technology to get them to the 30 MPG range. Fuel cells could eventually be a player, but probably not much action by 2020.
Light trucks. EVs and fuel cells could take 10% of this market. EVs fit a niche where there are a few local trips each day, but not a lot of miles.
Medium duty trucks (local delivery vehicles, garbage trucks, etc). Diesel will still dominate by 2020. EVs will be less than 2%. Fuel cells could carve out a 10-20% slice, but not by 2020. This is a good target for fuel cells because most of these vehicles return to base daily where they could get tanked up overnight. A 250 mile range would be fine for most. An interesting player is hybrid systems using micro-turbines. Wrightspeed is building this now. Runs on anything, including natural gas, and has virtually no maintenance cost and a useful life three times the average Diesel life. Uses no fluids.
Heavy duty and OTR trucks. Still dominated by Diesel, but a lot more Diesels running off natural gas (see Cummins and Westport). Again, micro-turbines can be a real player. Wal-Mart, Kenworth, Capstone, and Great Dane have a very interesting pilot running now. This could run off natural gas or hydrogen. But if we make the hydrogen from natural gas, there is no point of doing that conversion.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)If you disagree with one of those projections, then explain why you think it is wrong.
If you are just going to come in with "because Elon Musk if building a big battery plant" then don't waste anybody's time. Batteries won't work anytime soon in the majority of transportation applications, especially the ones that use the most fuel and create the most carbon in the atmosphere.
Blue Owl
(50,256 posts)n/t
Arkana
(24,347 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)fast food joints replacing gas stations on the highways.
meow2u3
(24,759 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)they could power a round trip to Mars.
*I keed, I keed, my Californian DUers.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)how they're getting hydrogen from the methane. Or are they using methane and calling it hydrogen, in which case the exhaust would also contain CO2.
Just askin'.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)you're right, they should have explained how you get hydrogen from methane
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen
freebrew
(1,917 posts)Iggo
(47,534 posts)Yeah!!!
boston bean
(36,218 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I thought natural gas was methane. And then how do we make hydrogen from it? It seems to me this would be a blind alley because methane is 20x worse as a greenhouse gas than CO2.
I don't get the excitement, although doing something useful with poop is certainly an outcome devoutly to be wished.
boston bean
(36,218 posts)excrement?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Kilgore
(1,733 posts)It's a process called steam reformation. Common in the chemical industry.
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/chen1/
Kilgore
fredamae
(4,458 posts)Sh!t
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Sometimes you have to remind folks what a real car feels like
Blue Owl
(50,256 posts)Great invention but gonna be tough to market...
valerief
(53,235 posts)Kilgore
(1,733 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Daimler AG, with thirty-six experimental units powered by Ballard Power Systems fuel cells completing a successful three-year trial, in eleven cities, in January 2007.[1][2]
Thor Industries (the largest maker of buses in the U.S.), based on UTC Power fuel cell technology
Irisbus, based on UTC Power fuel cell technology
There are also fuel cell powered buses currently active or in production, such as a fleet of Thor buses with UTC Power fuel cells in California, operated by SunLine Transit Agency.[3]
Hydrogen-powered fuel-cell buses began operating in Beijing on an experimental basis in 2006.[4] Three fuel cell buses, made by Daimler in Germany and purchased with a grant from the U.N. Development Programme, were the first fuel cell buses to enter operation in China.[4] The technology has not gained broader use in the city because air pollution reduced the efficiency and operating life of fuel cells.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell_bus
An elevated view of London's first HyFLEET:CUTE hydrogen fuel cell bus, showing the six roof mounted hydrogen fuel tanks, looking down from the high level concourse at Tower Gateway Docklands Light Railway station.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)3catwoman3
(23,944 posts)...for a multipurpose car.
Replace the regular seats with comfortable bidets, drive in the nude, and you can refuel your car "as you go," so to speak.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Then you'd really be talking about power to the people
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)in Emeryville, CA, in between Oakland and Berkeley.
edit: Oh yes, welcome to DU!
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)DebJ
(7,699 posts)My favorite is ASS-UV
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Yet, leave it to California ... from the in-ternet to the out-house. Gotcha covered.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)its just official now.