Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHigher education shouldn't be a market. No wonder tuition fees are failing
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/21/higher-education-market-tuition-fees-failing-9000-poundsToday, as the phrase goes, will be a good day to bury bad news. What to do about Vladimir Putin? What happened to flight MH370? And what kind of hash has George Osborne made of people's pensions?
But for all that, there is subterranean scandal that should not pass unnoticed. The highly contentious student loans system is unravelling. Many predicted that it would. The surprise, given its high profile and political toxicity, is that it is falling apart so fast, but perhaps that can't be helped. Hopelessly flawed, it seems to be falling under its own weight.
Questioning of ministers by Labour's Liam Byrne reveals that the write-off costs have reached 45% of the £10bn in student loans made each year, all but nullifying any savings to the public purse made by the new fee system. They started out with a £3,000 loan ceiling which in fact became the norm. Then they hiked it up to £9,000, the better to lift the burden from the Treasury and to give us in the jargon beloved by ministers world-class universities enabling us to compete in the global race.
What is actually happening seems very different, as the parliamentary admissions concede that the resource accounting and budgeting (RAB) charge indicating the level of likely default is fast approaching the 48.6% mark. At that point, experts say, the government will lose more money than it would have saved by keeping the old £3,000 cap. But the situation may be worse than that. Internal estimates within Vince Cable's business department put the default threshold at 47%, rather than the 48.6% figure calculated by experts outside Whitehall. Which brings armageddon even closer. All that pain, all that argument, all that political damage particularly for the Liberal Democrats who cast away popularity to help the government hike its fees and for what?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 520 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Higher education shouldn't be a market. No wonder tuition fees are failing (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2014
OP
justabob
(3,069 posts)1. I am curious what the number is for the US
for "likely defaults". The price of education in general has gone completely haywire. It is insane.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)2. A LOT of things shouldn't be a "market", but.........
Hey! That's capitalism. Under capitalism, EVERYTHING'S a market, if not now, then as soon as possible.
Wounded Bear
(58,618 posts)3. I've heard that this is the next 'bubble' for our economy...
We're so screwed. Education should NOT be a for-profit venture.