General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUnder the ACA, could each state with an exchange add a "public option"?
Is there any funding available for that "experiment" through the ACA (like Vermont will get for its single-payer)?
Could this public option include in its network all the state's hospitals and other medical providers?
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)the only issue there is no funding to establish a single payer system.
It is very unfortunate we live in a country where the politicians in your local area get to decide what you get...the point being for 'basic' needs such as healthcare shouldn't this be a national standard/process?
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)And of course it would be optimal if we had a Federal system. But in lieu of that, couldn't the states be a place to start?
By the way, each Canadian province has its own system. There is no single Canadian national healthcare.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)(From: http://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2013/10/29/coming-in-2017-vermonts-single-payer-system )
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)than the least populous Canadian province.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Medicaid in each state has different eligibility criteria. Medicaid could be funded to provide expansion in all states with no strings attached but it would never pass.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... A public option to the federal exchange.
Wouldn't that drive some GOP goveners nuts.