Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,153 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:01 PM Mar 2014

I'll be totally honest here. I have no clue who the so-called "purity patrol" is here.

Is it:

A) Those who demand all posters to be unequivocally and unabashedly loyal to a predetermined set of principles they view as vital towards the liberal/progressive cause, and seek to shun any individuals or elected officials (members of the Democratic party as they may be) who deviate away from said predetermined set of principles.

Or is it:

B) Those who demand all posters to be unequivocally and unabashedly loyal to major elected officials in the Democratic Party and fear that dissent will ultimately benefit only Republicans and conservatives.

Seriously, I don't know who is supposed to be the so-called "purity patrol" here. And frankly, both ends of the spectrum can come off looking hyperbolic and silly at times.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

question everything

(47,434 posts)
1. Never heard of a "purity patrol"
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:03 PM
Mar 2014

Just because someone or some wish to establish such an entity does not make it valid or true.

I know that some have alerted but I think that the best response should be to let it sink. Just ignore such comments, do not respond, do not recommend and it will sink.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. I try not to use terms like that, it's divisive and really a distraction.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:04 PM
Mar 2014

The answer to your question is neither, it's a vague term without specific meaning, just an insult.

And, yes, both ends come off looking bad more often than not.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
3. In my experience it's usually A, as I've never seen anyone
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:04 PM
Mar 2014

say that we have to support all people who call themselves Democrats no matter what. Probably because that would be just stupid.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
5. The OP's start off like this, "all real libs or all real
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:10 PM
Mar 2014

progressives or all real Dems do or think such and such.
Then they sit back wait for disagreeing responses.
When I see that I trash the thread and put the poster on ignore.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
9. I'd call them posters who read the TOS. The purpose of the site is to help elect Democrats.
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:22 PM
Mar 2014

Thus it is called Democratic Underground.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
7. I thought we're not supposed to say
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:14 PM
Mar 2014

"Purity" or "purist". The purists get upset and say you're name calling.

Response to Tommy_Carcetti (Original post)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
10. Adhering to one's principles, even when those are in opposition to the Party Leader,
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:42 PM
Mar 2014

is a sign of integrity not hyperbole.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'll be totally honest he...