Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 10:20 AM Mar 2014

NYT: Why a Symbolic Democratic Agenda Is Better Than None

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/why-a-symbolic-democratic-agenda-is-better-than-none/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0

But there is a very specific reason why nothing is getting done in Washington: Republican intransigence. And Democrats announced a plan this week to remind voters of that fact. They plan to push ahead with a package of at least 10 bills that would benefit the middle class and those hoping to join it, knowing full well that Republicans will either filibuster the bills in the Senate or kill them in the House.

In addition to the unemployment benefit extension they advanced today, the package includes bills to raise the minimum wage, eliminate the salary gap between men and women, cut the interest rate on college loans, and end tax loopholes that help businesses with overseas incomes. Other bills would protect Medicare from various Republican plans to cut it, spend money on infrastructure repair, and make child care more affordable.

Senator Patty Murray of Washington proposed an important expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit, which will be a huge benefit to low-income childless families and two-earner families, following a proposal by Mr. Obama earlier this year. And in the House, Democrats officially introduced a discharge petition to force a vote on the Senate’s immigration bill, which has languished for months.

Discharge petitions almost always fail, and so do most ambitious Democratic agendas. It’s pretty clear that for the rest of this election year, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress will produce a depressingly long list of failed symbolic bills, designed only to highlight the stubbornness of the opposition.



I only wish the Democrats would reach further left in their proposals. Why not put protection of voting rights and greater expansion of the social safety net on the table, and force the Republicans to go on record as against these popular items?
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Why a Symbolic Democratic Agenda Is Better Than None (Original Post) Scuba Mar 2014 OP
Hey, I have a suggestion. giftedgirl77 Mar 2014 #1
I laid out my suggestions for a Democratic agenda Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #2
Beltway Democrats don't want an agenda they will be held accountable to BlueStreak Mar 2014 #4
I especially like your last paragraph. riqster Mar 2014 #3
 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
1. Hey, I have a suggestion.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 10:25 AM
Mar 2014

How about they do this shit all the time? You know since it is their job & all.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. I laid out my suggestions for a Democratic agenda
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 10:25 AM
Mar 2014

the other day in one of your threads. Why will nobody listen to me?

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. Beltway Democrats don't want an agenda they will be held accountable to
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 10:44 AM
Mar 2014

You don't see them marching forward with any bold proposals, do you? No. Their plan is to just argue that Republcans do less than Democrats do. That is a loser. If you want people to vote for you, you need to tell them why it is in the voter's interests to do so. What can the voter expect if they elect you to office? Here is a modest proposal, patterned around the highly successful Contract with America from the 1990s:



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Why a Symbolic Demo...