General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOkay, honestly, I don't know the endgame is for the "But....Iraq!" crowd.
Can someone fill me in?
How sufficiently long must the self-flagellation and sack cloth wearing period last?
Are we prohibited from weighing in on any act of foreign aggression within the world indefinitely because of what George W. Bush did?
Is Germany prohibited as well? Great Britain? Spain? Japan? Canada? (Just kidding on that last one.)
Must we insist that we all wear the albatrosses of our pasts around our necks? Because if that's the case, international consensus building would be next to none. Just about every country would be forced to shut its mouth for a perceived lack of "moral authority".
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Its not. Iraq was a recent blatant example of decades of aggression and imperialism.
You're free to forget it whenever you want I take it. What difference does it make
FraDon
(518 posts)purchase orders await the "send" order.
The war profiteers salivate.
Really, will ya just get out of their way, ya know, like 9-11.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)I'll take our human rights, other country invasion and war record over theirs any day of the week. It really puts people's thought processes and loyalties in perspective when they support Russia as the more noble government vs. the US. Anyone who can defend Russia's political and war history has some serious problems and aren't advocates for human and civil rights.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)shit he is.. and there's more..
Tough-Talking Putin Crafted Image His Way
by Gregory Feifer - May 03, 2008
...The Kremlin has worked hard to build Putin's public image as Russia's virile "national leader" whose authority extends beyond his presidency...
Few people had heard of Vladimir Putin when Russia's then-President Boris Yeltsin appointed him prime minister in 1999. But the stern-faced former KGB officer triggered a love affair with the Russian population by starting a popular second war in Chechnya later that year...
"If they're in the airport," Putin said, "we'll kill them there ... and excuse me, but if we find them in the toilet, we'll exterminate them in their outhouses."
...Putin has often lost his temper in public. During a 2002 news conference in Brussels, Belgium, the president responded to a question that angered him by inviting a reporter to come to Moscow to be circumcised:
"We have specialists in this question, as well," Putin said. "I'll recommend that he carry out the operation in such a way that nothing will grow back..."
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90083829
freshwest
reformist2
(9,841 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Its about credibility, and it will take time for other countries to listen to us again.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)The world thought he was different. Just like most of us did.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Credibility does not come from innocence or sanctimony, either one. It comes from competence and integrity, something we have been sorely lacking in. And it's not about Obama, it is a mistake to make it about Obama for the same reason that it is a mistake to make it about Snowden. In neither case is the person really the problem. Obama would not be there if he didn't play the game, and then we'd have some other person, likely a complete fool, instead.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I find your question personally offensive-- not in a mean way, so I'm not accusing you of incivility or any such thing. It's offensive because what our country did in our names in Iraq still shocks and offends me, and I regard it as one of the central failures of human decency in my lifetime. Notwithstanding the dangers of making comparisons with Nazis, the decade of sanctions and the invasion of Iraq pissed on every principle of international law that the U.S. once embodied after Nuremberg. I cannot overstate how important that remains to me.
I will NEVER forget or forgive those who voted for the open ended AUMF. Its preamble is filled with lies that still stain the laws of this country today. I will not get over it, likely never. At the very least, I will not get over it until its perpetrators and abettors are dragged before judges in The Hague. You tell me how long that will be. I think we both know the answer.
The U.S. betrayed its own principles in Iraq. Sure, it's betrayed them before, in other places, and it will betray them again. Maybe it's just that the betrayal in Iraq occurred while I was paying close attention. It will not be over until justice is achieved for those who were harmed-- all of them-- and for Americans whose principles were betrayed by war criminals and unfit leaders. Moral authority is restored by moral action, not by time. The stain of Iraq will not simply fade. It will have to be scrubbed out. We have not even begun to do that yet.
polichick
(37,152 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)is breathtaking in its Republicanism.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)Please proceed, governor.
Rex
(65,616 posts)And here I thought it was just me.
GiveMeMorePIE
(54 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)good luck with that.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)never happen. I think the current problem is that the Pres appeared to try to play it down. That's a mistake with all the hard feeling still around the country.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)go about doing his job..
Nerdy Wonka @NerdyWonka
Follow
Pres. Obama didn't go to war; no, he went after the money & Putin picked up the phone to discuss diplomatic solutions http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/28/readout-president-s-call-president-putin
11:56 AM - 28 Mar 2014
125 Retweets 56 favorites
Reply
Retweet
Favorite
TOD
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Everyone knows they lied.
Here's Dubya, looking under the Oval Office rug for WMDs.