General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBridgegate report: New crisis, different woman, same Old Boys
Wow, here's a pretty good summation of the tactic of portraying Bridget Kelly as an unstable woman scorned. Kapow Mr. Mastro, take that! Here's an excerpt. You need to read the whole thing. It isn't that long.
In a report designed to clear Gov. Chris Christie of any wrongdoing in the George Washington Bridge controversy, the characterization of Bridget Anne Kelly by Christies attorney, Randy Mastro, was a direct lift from The Old Boys Club Handbook.
As read by Mastro before a bank of television cameras, the report portrayed Kelly essentially as a woman scorned, saying Christies former deputy chief of state and his former campaign manager, Bill Stepien, had been personally involved, that she had seemed emotional, and that Stepien had ended the relationship.
Despite the fact the investigating attorneys had interviewed neither Kelly nor Stepien, their report implied the two were not speaking at the time the access-lane closures had been ordered, and that Kellys jilted-woman status may have been at the root of the order.
Its the classic psychological profile of a woman if youre from the 14th century. It holds that, at times of crisis, women become emotional, irrational, unstable and unreliable.
Mastro told American Lawyer that his report had no sexist undertones. Kellys irate attorney, Michael Critchley, begged to differ.
(T)he reports venomous, gratuitous and inappropriate sexist remarks concerning Ms. Kelly, he said, have no place in what is alleged to be a professional and independent report.
Venomous, gratuitous, inappropriate. Got that right.
http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/03/bridgegate_report_new_crisis_different_woman_same_old_boys_opinion.html#incart_river_default
Spazito
(50,260 posts)thanks for posting this, it is well worth the read.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)spills it all. You want emotion???? I'll give you some GD emotion...Ahhhhh a Jersey Girl can dream
Laxman
(2,419 posts)she must be really pissed! This was a pretty good rant! Not to mention right on target.
Identify that circle of discussion, what they said and when they said it, and youre a lot closer to the answers than grabbing The Old Boys Club Handbook and flipping to the chapter titled PMS, Unrequited Love and Other Causes of Female Hysteria.
Squinch
(50,935 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Op
not seeing them
central scrutinizer
(11,646 posts)Hysterical and hysterectomy come from the same root word
Beach Rat
(273 posts)Ods bodkins! Do you think they realize just how bad it all sounds?
Laxman
(2,419 posts)I'm going to have to start using that! 18th Century language for 18th Century thinkers
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Why would he delegate so much responsibility to her then?
It also makes one wonder about what he expects to gain from this. She has no reason now to not tell everything she knows. Perhaps some immunity is in order?
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)All women will identify with this story and remember your stunning stupidity while in the voting booth.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)it is
when when a handful of duers talking about feminists issues pull out " emotional, irrational, unstable and unreliable and hysterical" most all of us call out that crap. along with shrill.
that is the old boys handbook. we recognize. we know. people used to stay quiet. we do not anymore.
garbage.
Laxman
(2,419 posts)almost seems purposeful. Are they really so confident of their ultimate vindication that their are comfortable to continue with retaliation as ususal? As this article points out-what the hell were the lawyers in the room-especially the women-thinking when they took the report in this direction?
It all seemed so stupidly unnecessary. Mastro had the goods on her: Her time for some traffic troubles in Fort Lee, message and the subsequent e-mail exchanges she had with Wildstein, electronically chortling over the havoc theyd created.
He and his team could easily have pinned the entire scheme on her and Wildstein without the amateur psychoanalysis.
It raises also questions about the judgment of other members of Mastros investigative team, particularly the women, who apparently didnt object to the rhetorical destruction of Kelly.
Didnt anyone in this roomful of high-powered lawyers utter Whoa, this is trouble, upon reading the portrayal of Kelly? Did no one foresee the potential adverse reaction to alleging that Kelly was victimized by her own hormones and couldnt help herself from retaliating against someone?
Even in his appearance on a Sunday morning news/talk show, Mastro was defiantly unapologetic, defending his work with the snarky observation that some people cant handle the truth.
So, for a million bucks or so, Christie got a guy who can quote Jack Nicholson.
http://www.njspotlight.com/stories/14/03/31/opinion-sexist-portrayal-of-bridget-kelly-puts-bridgegate-back-on-front-page/
malaise
(268,885 posts)and Christie et al are desperate.