Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:35 PM Apr 2014

I think tolerance should go both ways..

Last edited Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:09 PM - Edit history (1)

All Firefox boss did was donate money ...there is no evidence of discrimination against gays ...

So should he be forced to resign??

I would find it hard to support that.

Update: Based on the replies.. I see the fallacy in my reasoning..I now think what happened was fair..

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think tolerance should go both ways.. (Original Post) srican69 Apr 2014 OP
I missed it, who did he donate money to? Rex Apr 2014 #1
A $1,000 contribution in support of California's Proposition 8. PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #3
Thanks! So he made a political statement. Rex Apr 2014 #4
Money is speech, remember. nt mr_hat Apr 2014 #2
His donation to deny marriage equality is in and of itself evidence of discrimination. LanternWaste Apr 2014 #5
I agree ..but I meant discrimination in a more direct way... such as srican69 Apr 2014 #17
nope i will never be tolerant of bigotry. m-lekktor Apr 2014 #6
He should be ostracized . mwrguy Apr 2014 #7
Nobody forced him to resign. Xithras Apr 2014 #8
Yes tolerance goes both ways, and intolerance goes one way. nt CJCRANE Apr 2014 #9
So we should tolerate his intolerance? NightWatcher Apr 2014 #10
What if someone donated money to discriminate against him? CJCRANE Apr 2014 #11
He wasn't forced to resign, so stop lying. closeupready Apr 2014 #12
No Cirque du So-What Apr 2014 #13
Acceptance is what you should strive for. nt greyl Apr 2014 #14
sorry, I do not tolerate homophobia Skittles Apr 2014 #15
sorry, no justabob Apr 2014 #16
false equivalence. look it up. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2014 #18
+1 Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #21
Tolerance = you accept the other person and they accept you. CJCRANE Apr 2014 #19
The dude is a D-bag digonswine Apr 2014 #20
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Thanks! So he made a political statement.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:41 PM
Apr 2014

And is now facing the repercussions for his actions, as it should be imo.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
5. His donation to deny marriage equality is in and of itself evidence of discrimination.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:43 PM
Apr 2014

"there is no evidence of discrimination against gays..."

His donation to deny marriage equality is in and of itself evidence of discrimination.


"I think tolerance should go both ways..
Asking one to tolerate intolerance is almost as absurd as asking one to light the way with darkness.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
17. I agree ..but I meant discrimination in a more direct way... such as
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:04 PM
Apr 2014

Refusing to hire etc

But I see your point. Thanks

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
6. nope i will never be tolerant of bigotry.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:44 PM
Apr 2014

he donated to proposition 8 which was bigotry against lgbt folks and people caught wind of it and many of his underlings at mozilla resigned and people decided to boycott the browser. then he resigned. seriously where in fk does this "we must tolerate the intolerant" come from? i refuse , it is insane!

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. Nobody forced him to resign.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:53 PM
Apr 2014

I choose not to do business with people who are actively working against my political and social goals. This guy supported Prop 8, and he's the CEO of the company, so I choose to avoid the company. Apparently a lot of people did the same thing, which was impacting the company negatively. He resigned because he realized that his presence was going to kill the company.

I reserve the right to support, both personally and financially, companies that promote and support my views on gay rights, the environment, and a couple of other causes that are very important to me. I also have the right to withhold that support from companies that oppose them. We all do.

This guy made his choice. More importantly, he has been consistently unapologetic about them. If he'd done a mea culpa, offered money to gay rights organizations, and publicly renounced his previous donation, he MIGHT have been able to get out from under this. Instead he chose to defend himself by hiding behind his "personal beliefs". He was correct when he said that he has the right to his own personal beliefs, but SO DO WE. And I believe that we should not associate with people who are actively trying to deny equality to their fellow human beings.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
10. So we should tolerate his intolerance?
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:55 PM
Apr 2014

Sorry, nope.

If you're a bigot, I say you can go fuck yourself. I refuse to tolerate assholes.

Cirque du So-What

(25,927 posts)
13. No
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 04:59 PM
Apr 2014

He's free to be as bigoted an asshole as he chooses to be - just as it it our choice to buy their product or withhold our money (it's speech, remember) as we see fit.

Skittles

(153,147 posts)
15. sorry, I do not tolerate homophobia
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:03 PM
Apr 2014

and neither should you

he is free to donate to whomever he pleases - and we are free to let him know he is a homophobic prick

justabob

(3,069 posts)
16. sorry, no
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:04 PM
Apr 2014

There is no other way to read a contribution against gay marriage. He does not believe glbtq people are equal. I will not ever tolerate that, nor SHOULD I... nor should you or anyone else who believes that all people are equal. He is free to donate against Prop 8 or to the KKK or whatever hateful group, but he has to own it and take the consequences for it.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
19. Tolerance = you accept the other person and they accept you.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:08 PM
Apr 2014

When one side decides to be intolerant, they unbalance the equation, it doesn't work any more.

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
20. The dude is a D-bag
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 06:07 PM
Apr 2014

I think the whole thing has been framed poorly, though.
If there is an outcry, and he is no longer seen as someone that can represent the company's outlook-he then cannot do the job--fair or not.

I think that portraying this like he was fired for being a bigoted asshole is wrong. He was no longer able to serve the function he was supposed to.

I have been listening to XTIAN radio on my way home--THEY frame it like he is being persecuted for his beliefs---this is business, period, IMO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think tolerance should ...