General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Machine Can Tell Whether You're Liberal or Conservative
""
Thomas Jefferson was a smart dude. And in one of his letters to John Adams, dated June 27, 1813, Jefferson made an observation about the nature of politics that science is only now, two centuries later, beginning to confirm. "The same political parties which now agitate the United States, have existed through all time," wrote Jefferson. "The terms of Whig and Tory belong to natural, as well as to civil history," he later added. "They denote the temper and constitution of mind of different individuals."
Tories were the British conservatives of Jefferson's day, and Whigs were the British liberals. What Jefferson was saying, then, was that whether you call yourself a Whig or a Tory has as much to do with your psychology or disposition as it has to do with your ideas. At the same time, Jefferson was also suggesting that there's something pretty fundamental and basic about Whigs (liberals) and Tories (conservatives), such that the two basic political factions seem to appear again and again in the world, and have for "all time."
Jefferson didn't have access to today's scientific machineryeye tracker devices, skin conductance sensors, and so on. Yet these very technologies are now being used to reaffirm his insight. At the center of the research are many scholars working at the intersection of psychology, biology, and politics, but one leader in the field is John Hibbing, a political scientist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln whose "Political Physiology Laboratory" has been producing some pretty stunning results.
"We know that liberals and conservatives are really deeply different on a variety of things," Hibbing explains on the latest episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast (stream above). "It runs from their tastes, to their cognitive patternshow they think about things, what they pay attention toto their physical reactions. We can measure their sympathetic nervous systems, which is the fight-or-flight system. And liberals and conservatives tend to respond very differently."
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/inquiring-minds-john-hibbing-physiology-ideology
We should strap one of these puppies onto every person that wants to hold a political office ...
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Is that the testing shows that the biggest difference between liberals and right wingers is that right wingers get more easily disgusted, and yet it is the right wingers that consistently commit evil against other human beings, things that shock, and see no problem with it, feel it isn't wrong, and show no sensitivity toward that evil.
How do you figure?
One of the biggest differences clearly involves the emotion of disgust. Hibbing isn't the only one to have found a relationship between conservatism and stronger disgust sensitivitythis result is also a mainstay of the very influential research of moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who studies how deep-seated moral emotions divide the left and the right (see here). In one study, Hibbing and his colleagues showed that a higher level of disgust sensitivity is predictive not only of political conservatism but also disapproval of gay marriage. It is important to underscore that your disgust sensitivity is involuntary; it is not something under your control. It is a primal, gut emotion.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)that they use that disgust to dehumanize whatever the object of it is. Their behavior isn't disgusting to them, because they consider the target of their behavior to be untermensch.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)repulsive behavior.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)Even weirder when they're the ones that wave a cross around like they were fighting vampires, while opposing literally everything Jesus actually said.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)we perceive as outside of ourselves. Getting a strangers saliva on us is disgusting. Experiencing a spouse's spit is actually desirable. This is because we have internalized a spouse's being into our own.
So because conservatives experience others as so alien and separate from their own self
they are capable of doing harm to others not part of their "tribe".
rrneck
(17,671 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)but not disgusted by Charles Koch, who is such an evil pig and works so hard to do tremendous harm to the poorest people in this country. Causing hunger and death to some does noty cause the Repukes nausea. The joy of a mixed couple being together, however, causes them great nausea attacks.
You know, some people just fit the description of evil rather nicely, and few do it better than the Republicans.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)All Fox does is get their viewers mad. Mad at Obama and mad at the woman who buys champagne with food stamps and mad at the government for this and mad at the school who sent a kid home for ...
Fox News: All Assholes All The Time.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)I mean, yes-- if you look at people as unchanging beings that are simply born with a certain mindset. But I don't think we are, really.
I wish I could remember the specifics of the study I'm half-recalling here...
Anyway, it tracked a collection of conservative students during their college careers. They tended to come from very insular communities, and became much more liberal on a variety of issues as they met and mixed with different types of people.
It seems completely unsurprising that someone who comes from a homogenous little society would be very easily disgusted.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)progressoid
(49,977 posts)I'm a little concerned when these kinds of studies limit us to just liberal or conservative. Seems to me there are a lot a variations on the political spectrum.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)in any political or religious system.
Liberals of any religion or none are fairly similar (live and let live types) and conservatives of all religions are usually the restrictive types that want to get in the way of other people's personal lives.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)After all, in Nebraska some people think that Bob Kerrey is a liberal.