General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPvt. Chelsea Manning Credited! This is a shocking report on State Dept. ABUSE OF FUNDS and More:
Pvt. Chelsea Manning Credited! This is a shocking report on State Dept. ABUSE OF FUNDS and More:http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/state-department-inspector-general-issues-alert-over-6-billion-in-contracting-money/2014/04/03/8ebf465c-bb73-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html
Linick initiated the alert format to report on problems that remain unaddressed despite repeatedly being identified in IG audits and investigations. The first alert, released in January in partly classified form, cited significant and recurring weaknesses in the Department of State Information System Security Program.
Issued three years after the public release of hundreds of thousands of department cables, which then-Army Pvt. Bradley Manning had turned over to WikiLeaks, the first alert found that efforts to find and fix the problems had been insufficient.
The new alert addressed a similarly sensitive issue: the governments inability to keep track of the growing number of outside contractors who have taken the place of government workers. A series of special government and congressional investigations has identified widespread contracting fraud in both the State and Defense departments, especially in overseas expenditures.
A succession of IG audits, investigations and inspections, the report said, found repeated examples of poor contract file administration. Among the examples it cited was a recent audit of the closeout process for contracts supporting the U.S. mission in Iraq. When auditors asked for a sample of 115 contract files, officials were unable to provide 33 of them, totaling $2.1 billion. Of the remaining 82, the report said, 48 contained insufficient documents required by federal law.
During an ongoing audit of States Bureau of African Affairs, the report said, officials did not provide complete files for any of the eight contracts reviewed, with a value of $34.8 million.
to jakeXT for the Original OP which you can read here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024781091
-------
Whole article is well worth the read! at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/state-department-inspector-general-issues-alert-over-6-billion-in-contracting-money/2014/04/03/8ebf465c-bb73-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)There should be far more scrutiny of this contractor bullshit.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024781091
It's well worth the read!
I don't know why our DU'ers didn't read or undertand this important Report. Maybe it just came in on a Down Time at DU...where folks weren't focusing on it.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)in the Department of State Information System Security Program, such as those allowing Manning to release .. hundreds of thousands of department cables .. to WikiLeaks
It's an odd reading, to understand that as giving "credit" to Manning
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)"Money trumps peace."
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Got smart PDQ.
The United States should be in the dock, not Bradley Manning
The whistleblower has allowed us to scrutinise the hidden realities of US power
OWEN JONES
The Independent (UK), Sunday 2 June 2013
It has launched illegal and unjust wars with catastrophic human consequences; it has helped overthrow democratically elected governments; it arms and backs some of the most brutal dictatorships on the face of the earth; and it has a track record of supporting terrorist organisations. Even many of its ardent supporters admit that the US foreign policy elite has a somewhat chequered history.
SNIP...
Manning now begins a military trial, charged with a capital offence, though the prosecution promise not to seek the death penalty, leaving him facing 20 years in prison. As two US champions of the First Amendment on free speech, Floyd Abrams and Yochai Benkler, have written: If successful, the prosecution will establish a chilling precedent: national security leaks may subject the leakers to a capital prosecution or at least life imprisonment.
SNIP...
No wonder powerful interests in the US want to make an example of Manning. Among the videos he released was an Apache helicopter conducting a bombing raid that killed Iraqi civilians and a Reuters journalist. The most alarming aspect of the video to me was the seemingly delightful bloodlust they appeared to have, Manning has said, appalled by the lack of value for human life shown by the pilots descriptions of dead bastards. Here was the on-the-ground reality of both the Iraq and Afghan wars, he claimed.
The truth is Manning has done a great service, both to the American people and to the world as a whole. US foreign policy depends on secrecy, not simply because of fear of US enemies, but because the reality would often horrify the American people.
CONTINUED...
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-united-states-should-be-in-the-dock-not-bradley-manning-8641164.html
So. Revealing crime is a crime. Hello, 1984!
progressoid
(49,985 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Anybody we know?
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)it was the President who failed to nominate an inspector general for 5 years. It is also the President who likes to brag about his reduction in the number of federal employees while leaving off the part about continuing and expanding the use of private (non-vetted) contractors at a higher cost to the taxpayers.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Sorry Jack but it was the President who failed to nominate an inspector general for 5 years."
...had been vacant since January 2008.
If one can reconcile the fact that some of the information is sourced to documents released by Manning, one would realize that most of the discrepancies are not recent, e.g. a $1 billion contract as of May 2008. Still, what does the President nominating an IG have to do with the State Department's contracting and record keeping habits?
Here is the report.
http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/224580.pdf
The new IG was sworn in November 2013.
http://oig.state.gov/aboutoig/offices/cpa/press/218123.htm
http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/219065.pdf
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)She was SoS for most of the time the IG was not in office.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)That WaPo went out to mention her Contributions...was sort of a break through.
If only we had BACK UP for new Reveleations/Investigative Reporting!
and thanks for the kick.