conventional wisdom doesn’t come from nowhere
An earlier edition of the World Economic Outlook analyzed historical experience with high debt, and found that countries that were willing to let inflation erode their debt including the United States fared much better than those, like Britain after World War I, that clung to monetary and fiscal orthodoxy.
But the I.M.F. evidently doesnt feel able to say outright what its analysis clearly implies. Instead, the report resorts to euphemisms that preserve deniability: the analysis could have implications for the appropriate monetary policy framework.
So what makes the obvious unsayable?
In a direct sense, what were seeing is the power of conventional wisdom. But conventional wisdom doesnt come from nowhere, and Im increasingly convinced that our failure to deal with high unemployment has a lot to do with class interests.
...
...as the latest I.M.F. report shows, theres strong evidence that changes in the global economy are increasing the tendency of investors to hoard cash rather than put funds to work, thereby increasing the risk of liquidity traps unless the inflation target is raised. But the report never dares to say this outright.
So why is the obvious unsayable? One answer is that serious people like to prove their seriousness by calling for tough choices and sacrifice (by other people, of course). They hate being told about answers that dont involve more suffering.
And behind this attitude, one suspects, lies class bias. Doing what America did after World War II using low interest rates and inflation to erode the debt burden is often referred to as financial repression, which sounds bad. But who wouldnt prefer modest inflation and a bit of asset erosion to mass unemployment? Well, you know who: the 0.1 percent, who receive only 4 percent of wages but account for more than 20 percent of total wealth.
Modestly higher inflation, say 4 percent, would be good for the vast majority of people, but it would be bad for the superelite. And guess who gets to define conventional wisdom.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/opinion/krugman-oligarchs-and-money.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0