Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,824 posts)
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 08:48 PM Apr 2014

5 Offensive Analogies Abstinence-Only Lessons Use To Tell Teens Sex Makes Them Dirty

Source: Think Progress


Whenever the subject material of an abstinence-only lesson is reported in the media, Americans are typically shocked to hear what kids are hearing in their classes or at their school assemblies. In addition to withholding valuable information about preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, some of these courses also rely on harmful shame-based attitudes about human sexuality to impart negative messages to the 95 percent of Americans who have sex before marriage.

Here are five common analogies that abstinence-only curricula use to teach youth that becoming sexually active will make them worthless — and five good reasons that more states should enact comprehensive sex education requirements:

<snip>

4. A cup of spit.
“Drink the spit” is an exercise that requires students to pass around a cup and spit in it. Then, students are asked if they would choose to drink that cup. The idea is the same as the chocolate or the tape lessons — having multiple sexual partners, and subsequently exchanging bodily fluids with multiple people, is undesirable. Sometimes the symbolism of this lesson gets pretty explicit. For instance, one variation involves pouring the cups of spit into an empty glass pitcher placed next to a pitcher of clean water. Students are asked to which pitcher they would like their “future husband” or “future wife” to come from.


Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/04/07/3423582/abstinence-only-dirty-analogies/

who comes up with this shite?!
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 Offensive Analogies Abstinence-Only Lessons Use To Tell Teens Sex Makes Them Dirty (Original Post) demmiblue Apr 2014 OP
"who comes up with this shite?!" Brickbat Apr 2014 #1
I totally agree with you gopiscrap Apr 2014 #2
If you can stomach a book about this, pick up Jessica Valenti's "The Purity Myth" Scootaloo Apr 2014 #3
Back in 1957 or so, my "Home Economics" class (all girls) was told by the teacher: enough Apr 2014 #4
Elizabeth Smart had a good reason why the "worthless" label should not be used. Thinkingabout Apr 2014 #5
In re: the chocolate piece passed around, a commenter on ThinkProgress said "put it in a condom. . . Journeyman Apr 2014 #6
Remember, kids! xfundy Apr 2014 #7
Ann Landers did. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2014 #8

enough

(13,255 posts)
4. Back in 1957 or so, my "Home Economics" class (all girls) was told by the teacher:
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 09:45 PM
Apr 2014

"Men don't like shopworn goods."

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
5. Elizabeth Smart had a good reason why the "worthless" label should not be used.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:45 PM
Apr 2014

She said when speaking to a group of students you do not always know what each student may be experiencing, perhaps they may be sexually abused in their homes or other places. It should never be said to a person who is being sexually abused they are worthless for having sex, their perpetrator is the worthless person. Teach them about safe sex, how to get out of an abusive situation, rebuild their self worth, do not further a use them.

Journeyman

(15,026 posts)
6. In re: the chocolate piece passed around, a commenter on ThinkProgress said "put it in a condom. . .
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 10:57 PM
Apr 2014

and pass it all around," show everyone how clean and edible it remains no matter how many hands touch it. That'd put the lie to that particular offensive analogy.

But seriously, there's a reason why math, chemistry and physics aren't taught using such stupid methods. Why is biology the only science bastardized by such insufferably negative and offensively useless teaching methods?

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
8. Ann Landers did.
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 01:17 AM
Apr 2014

She was part of the virginity/double standard cult.

She was uptight and ranted about how boys only want one thing(without telling us what that was), and if they get it they'll drop you like a used Kleenex.

Yes, I actually saw her say this in a movie they showed us in a high school. Public high school.
The purpose was to make us feel guilty and shameful about any sexual thoughts we had.

She said this through her ill-fitting dentures. She said that on a date, you should go bowling or play miniature golf.
You should do ANYTHING except kissing and making out. That was the worst thing you could do. Kissing and making out, or god forbid, having sex, made you "used goods" and worthless if you were a girl.

She repeated that crap from the 50s to the 80s, and Middle America listened to it, and believed it.

I didn't know anything different, because my parents (adults in WWII generation) told us absolutely nothing about sex. The high school didn't tell us anything about sex, and what they told us to scare us was inaccurate.

And they wonder why girls don't have self-esteem?


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Offensive Analogies Abs...