Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUkraine: not all rebellions are revolutions - New deal, same players
Ukraines president has fled and there is an interim government, but the power brokers who will make or break the countrys future include many of the same oligarchs who backed the last regime. And the corruption wont stop.by Jean-Arnault Dérens and Laurent Geslin
The Donbass Palace Hotel, off Lenin Square in Donetsk, is the most luxurious in eastern Ukraine. Rooms in this flagship of Rinat Akhmetovs empire cost around $500 a night, much more than the average monthly wage. Akhmetov, the richest man in Ukraine, was a close associate of former president Viktor Yanukovych but after the Kiev uprising pragmatically switched his support to the new regime. Besides the hotel and real estate, Akhmetov owns the citys football team, Shakhtar Donetsk, mines, steelworks and factories. Among the clans of Ukraines oligarchy, the largest fortunes have been made in the industrial and mining valley of the Don. This region, made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, was a major centre of mining and industry in the Soviet era.
Donbass still generates a quarter of Ukraines foreign currency earnings, even though only 95 mines are still officially active, compared to 230 two decades ago. Over the same period, seven million people have left the country. Soon after independence in 1991, local people faced economic meltdown and the first state mine closures, and began mining illegally. Round here you only have to dig down a metre to find coal, said a former miner from Torez, an industrial city near Donetsk named after a French Communist leader (1). In the makeshift tunnels, shored up with wooden props, accidents are common. Yet miners are willing to risk going underground for the prospect of just a few hundred dollars a month. After Yanukovych came to power in 2010, the network of these kopanki (illegal mines) was regulated and controlled.
Coal from the kopanki was sold cheaply to the state mines, which sold it on at market price, said Anatoly Akimochkin, vice-president of the Ukraines Independent Miners Union. As well as these profits, state mines also received government subsidies. A large part of this money disappeared into the pockets of cronies of the regime, said Akimochkin. According to expert estimates, 10% of Ukraines coal output in recent years has come from illegal mines. Behind this network is the former presidents elder son, Oleksandr Yanukovych, who went into competition with the owners of the privatised mines, led by Akhmetov.
Different deal of the cards
A revolution? No, its just a different deal of the cards, said sociologist Volodymyr Ishchenko, deputy director of the Centre for Society Research in Kiev. A few weeks after Yanukovychs removal, his frustration was clear: This government defends the same values as the previous one: economic liberalism and getting rich. Not all rebellions are revolutions. Its unlikely that the Maidan movement will lead to profound changes that will justify calling it a revolution. The most serious candidate in the presidential election on 25 May is Petro Poroshenko, the chocolate king [because of the fortune he made in that industry], one of the richest men in the country. Even as demonstrators were being shot in the Maidan (Independence Square), the centre of popular anger since 22 November, a bizarre handover of power was being brokered behind closed doors with the powerful businessmen who have now taken control of Ukraine.
Over the past 20 years, Ukraine has experienced a form of development referred to as oligarchic pluralism. Many businessmen who amassed huge fortunes buying up mines and factories privatised cheaply after the fall of the Soviet Union have gone into politics. Oil and gas traders have become ministers or heads of major institutions. Former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a leading figure in the 2004 Orange Revolution who was held up in the West as a martyr when she was imprisoned in 2011, made a fortune in the gas industry. A revolving door has developed between business and politics. Some powerful businessmen have played a more discreet role by financing the campaigns of politicians whom they expect to represent their interests. This system, which became the accepted way of doing things under President Leonid Kuchma (1994-2005), assumes constant reconfiguration shaped by the competing interests of the powerful, and their alliances and feuds.
http://mondediplo.com/2014/04/03ukraine
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 441 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ukraine: not all rebellions are revolutions - New deal, same players (Original Post)
FarCenter
Apr 2014
OP
I guess it was worth all the blood spilled to put the "Chololate King" in power
LittleBlue
Apr 2014
#2
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)1. Good read. Thanks.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)2. I guess it was worth all the blood spilled to put the "Chololate King" in power
The west will no doubt hold this up as a triumph of democracy.