General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlindfolded, violinists unable to mark out a Stradivarius
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10750846/Stradivarius-Youd-be-better-off-with-a-modern-violin.html
However it may pain purists to learn that professional violinists cannot actually tell the difference between the antique instruments and modern models.
When 10 renowned soloists were blindfolded and asked to play a range of violins the majority preferred a newer instrument.
and someone recently bought a Stradivarius at a Sotheby's Auction for 45 Million Dollars !!!! I can understand if the violin belonged to Mozart ...
tridim
(45,358 posts)It is a hand-crafted, quality Stradivarius copy that will continue to get better with age... At 1/50,000th the cost!
Rich suckers.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Slow news day in the UK? See article on same Claudia Fritz study from January 2012 in the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/science/in-play-off-between-old-and-new-violins-stradivarius-lags.html?_r=0
Unless Prof. Fritz has just repeated the study again recently. In which case, it's still a kind of old story.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)tech3149
(4,452 posts)I only know stringed instruments but to me the value is in the sound and playability.
My first guitar was a busted up Harmony F hole that I put back together. It was tough as hell to play because the action was high but it was great training. It sounded great, I almost felt like Django. My next was a cheap assed Fender flat top. It played like a dream and sounded really good for a laminated top. I nicknamed it "rubberneck" because it was so cheaply built.
I've played Guild, Martin,Taylor, and many others over the years.
Some of the best I've played have been far from the most expensive. The value is in the enjoyment.