Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 09:20 AM Apr 2014

Blindfolded, violinists unable to mark out a Stradivarius


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10750846/Stradivarius-Youd-be-better-off-with-a-modern-violin.html


The name Stradivarius has been synonymous with musical excellence for three centuries with instruments selling for millions amid claims that their sound quality is unparalleled.
However it may pain purists to learn that professional violinists cannot actually tell the difference between the antique instruments and modern models.
When 10 renowned soloists were blindfolded and asked to play a range of violins the majority preferred a newer instrument.




and someone recently bought a Stradivarius at a Sotheby's Auction for 45 Million Dollars !!!! I can understand if the violin belonged to Mozart ...


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blindfolded, violinists unable to mark out a Stradivarius (Original Post) srican69 Apr 2014 OP
Hehe, my violin, made in 1918 sells for about $900, and it sounds better than any Strad I've heard. tridim Apr 2014 #1
This study was in the news 2 years ago frazzled Apr 2014 #2
They don't look so blind to me. go west young man Apr 2014 #3
Not too surprised tech3149 Apr 2014 #4

tridim

(45,358 posts)
1. Hehe, my violin, made in 1918 sells for about $900, and it sounds better than any Strad I've heard.
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 10:03 AM
Apr 2014

It is a hand-crafted, quality Stradivarius copy that will continue to get better with age... At 1/50,000th the cost!

Rich suckers.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
2. This study was in the news 2 years ago
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 10:15 AM
Apr 2014

Slow news day in the UK? See article on same Claudia Fritz study from January 2012 in the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/science/in-play-off-between-old-and-new-violins-stradivarius-lags.html?_r=0

Unless Prof. Fritz has just repeated the study again recently. In which case, it's still a kind of old story.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
4. Not too surprised
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 10:43 AM
Apr 2014

I only know stringed instruments but to me the value is in the sound and playability.
My first guitar was a busted up Harmony F hole that I put back together. It was tough as hell to play because the action was high but it was great training. It sounded great, I almost felt like Django. My next was a cheap assed Fender flat top. It played like a dream and sounded really good for a laminated top. I nicknamed it "rubberneck" because it was so cheaply built.
I've played Guild, Martin,Taylor, and many others over the years.

Some of the best I've played have been far from the most expensive. The value is in the enjoyment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Blindfolded, violinists u...