Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,367 posts)
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 06:56 PM Apr 2014

Photos Taken By Pulitzer Center Journalists Flying Over the Oilsands This Week

more photos at link:
http://desmog.ca/2014/04/07/look-these-incredible-photos-by-pulitzer-center-journalists-flying-over-oilsands

Journalist Dan Grossman and photographer Alex MacLean are in the middle of their week long tour of the Alberta oilsands. Their on-the-scene reporting is meant to bring greater public attention to the scale – and the stakes – of developing oil from the world’s largest deposit of carbon-intensive bitumen.

As Grossman puts it on the Pulitzer Center website, “We know the ground beneath Alberta’s boreal forest—saturated with an estimated 150 billion barrels of oil—rivals all other troves of oil apart from those of Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. We know Alberta’s rich deposits underlie a territory of 54,000 square miles, as large as Iowa. But we can barely comprehend numbers this big. Alex will help us. He’ll show us waste ponds nearly the size of Manhattan and dump trucks that could swallow a McMansion whole.”

Grossman has been tweeting about his experience in the oilsands region prolifically since April 4th. Below you can see some of the duo’s photojournalist coverage of their trip so far.



How to describe Frt McMurray from air?



Journalists not permitted to visit. We appealed. Here's photo Alex shot of gooey #tarsands ooze up. At 1 of 4 site

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Photos Taken By Pulitzer Center Journalists Flying Over the Oilsands This Week (Original Post) G_j Apr 2014 OP
'Journalists not allowed to visit'. I wonder why! sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #1
Who owns the Alberta Tar Sands, anyway? Octafish Apr 2014 #2
of course G_j Apr 2014 #5
They're Doing to Canada Dirty Socialist Apr 2014 #7
Good info about a really bad thing! 2naSalit Apr 2014 #3
keystone xl pipes it to houston for processing, then on tankers to china where it turns into this pragmatic_dem Apr 2014 #4
This is what end-stage oilcoholism looks like. hunter Apr 2014 #6
Bingo. nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #12
Looks like my vision of Hell....only its Hell on Earth... KoKo Apr 2014 #8
K&R.. KoKo Apr 2014 #10
It is hard to tell the tremendous scale from a lot of these G_j Apr 2014 #13
k&r Duppers Apr 2014 #9
Jeeez. And hunters threaten wildlife. yeah. Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #11

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
1. 'Journalists not allowed to visit'. I wonder why!
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 07:03 PM
Apr 2014

Destroying the environment for profit. What I don't understand is, they could probably profit from development of alternative energy.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. Who owns the Alberta Tar Sands, anyway?
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 07:21 PM
Apr 2014
Non-Canadian corporations stake their claims to the resources

Alberta Federation of Labor
Friday, 22 April 2011

Foreign corporations, some controlled by national governments, have been using their economic clout to buy into Alberta's oil sands and take control of our natural resources.

U.S., French, British, Chinese, Thai, Korean and Norwegian interests have all bought stakes in oil-sands projects. According to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), international companies have invested nearly $20 billion in the last three years through mergers, partnerships and outright purchases of projects.

This increased foreign investment raises questions. Who has the right to develop our natural resources? Who sets the rules for how these resources are developed? Who controls where the resources are processed and sold?

One of the most recent major international investments came in November 2010, when Thailand's state-owned PTTEP bought a 40-per-cent stake in Statoil's Kai Kos Dehseh project for $2.3 billion. Statoil is a Norwegian company whose largest owner is the government of Norway, with 67 per cent of the shares. Under the terms of the deal, Statoil remained the majority owner and operator of the project, which ends up being a Norwegian-Thai, public-private enterprise developing Albertan energy resources.

In 2009, Korean National Oil Company took over Calgary's Harvest Energy Trust for $4.1 billion ($1.8 billion in cash and $2.3 billion in assumed debt). The deal allowed the Korean state-run company to grab an estimated oil production of 50,000 barrels per day (b/d) and 154 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves. At that time, the Korean companies were reportedly looking to acquire about 300,000 b/d of production by 2012 to offset South Korea's dependence on foreign oil – 97 per cent of which was imported.

This wasn't the first time the Korean National Oil Company came to Alberta. In 2006, the Korean firm set up an office in Calgary and purchased the Black Gold Oil Sands leases near Conklin. These leases gave the company 10,000 b/d of bitumen for about 25 years.

China is now the world's largest consumer of energy. Perhaps not surprisingly, this energy-hungry nation has significantly increased its presence in the oil sands in the last two years. In 2009, PetroChina struck a deal to buy a 60-per-cent share of Athabasca Oil Sands Corp.'s MacKay River and Dover projects for $1.9 billion plus other financing arrangements. This gave PetroChina a majority share in a company with access to more than five million barrels of oil.

In April 2010, the Chinese company Sinopec, a majority-owned subsidiary of a national company, paid $4.65 billion for Houston-based ConocoPhillips' stake in Syncrude. What makes this deal significant is that under the terms of the deal, the state-controlled Sinopec has a veto on the critical decision of whether the company should upgrade bitumen here or export it in raw form overseas.

Questions around Sinopec's motives on bitumen processing – whether here in Alberta or overseas – were raised to a fever pitch in January this year when Enbridge announced the Chinese company's funding of the $5.5-billion Northern Gateway Pipeline. Though still in the early stages of development, the Northern Gateway Pipeline is designed to carry 525,000 barrels of diluted raw bitumen day from Alberta to a tanker port at Kitimat, B.C., where oil tankers would transport it overseas for upgrading and processing.

Most oil-sands producers are thought to be looking to upgrade and refine here or in the U.S., rather than ship raw bitumen overseas, and then sell their oil to whatever market that offers the most money. Sinopec's investment in the Northern Gateway Pipeline, however, is seen as a strategy to ship massive amounts of bitumen out of North America to Asia for upgrading, refining and finally consumption in mainland China.

CONTINUED...

http://www.afl.org/index.php/May-2011/who-owns-our-oil-sands-foreign-corporations-stake-their-claims-to-our-resources.html
 

pragmatic_dem

(410 posts)
4. keystone xl pipes it to houston for processing, then on tankers to china where it turns into this
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 09:41 PM
Apr 2014

and will create a grand total of 50 jobs in the USA while making the Koch Bros billions.

?1

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
8. Looks like my vision of Hell....only its Hell on Earth...
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 02:23 PM
Apr 2014

And, we have 11 Democrats who want Obama to okay the rest of the pipeline for THIS? So they can get re-elected?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Photos Taken By Pulitzer ...