Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:01 PM Apr 2014

Breaking: Brutally Frank DoJ Report Says Albuquerque Police Use Unjustified Deadly Force.

Breaking: Brutally Frank DoJ Report Says Albuquerque Police Use Unjustified Deadly Force.

by jpmassar

A 46-page report on unjustified police violence in Albuquerque, New Mexico, was just released by the Department of Justice at a highly anticipated press conferencein the wake of the execution of James Boyd, a mentally ill man, by APD last month and the release of a graphic video. A few key points:

  • Officers too often use deadly force...

  • Officers use tasers on people who are non-threatening or unable to comply...

  • Officers use too much force on people who are mentally ill too often.




  • Here is a somewhat bigger image, easier to read.

    OpAlbuquerque @OpAlbuquerque
    Follow
    Report just passed out. Here is the first page #DOJAPD. The Feds find #apd has pattern/practice of deadly force
    12:05 PM - 10 Apr 2014

    13 Retweets 5 favorites

    From the report:

    We reviewed all fatal shootings by officers between 2009 and 2012 and found that officers were not justified under federal law in using deadly force in the majority of those incidents.

    - more -

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/10/1291021/-Breaking-DoJ-Report-Says-Albuquerque-Police-Use-Unjustified-Deadly-Force#


    14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
    Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
     

    Taitertots

    (7,745 posts)
    1. How many cops have been fired and/or imprisoned because of this report?
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:06 PM
    Apr 2014

    Just hot air until there are consequences for police abuse.

    Half-Century Man

    (5,279 posts)
    2. Wonder if the DOJ will do anything besides go, Yep....it's there.
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:12 PM
    Apr 2014

    What is the point of having a militarized police, if the police of the police are acting like Andy Taylor handling Otis?

    ConservativeDemocrat

    (2,720 posts)
    4. The DOJ *has* done something by saying "Yep.... it's there"
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:46 PM
    Apr 2014

    Believe me when I tell you that the courts take notice of these things.

    - C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

    Half-Century Man

    (5,279 posts)
    6. I have trouble trusting the initiators of the military law enforcement operatus....
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:03 PM
    Apr 2014

    ...to crack down on the military law enforcement operators.
    I mean no personal offense, but, I don't think shit would have been said if there hadn't been a viral video.

    ConservativeDemocrat

    (2,720 posts)
    8. This is why we have separation of powers
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:15 PM
    Apr 2014

    The courts aren't the initiators of the military law-enforcement apparatus.

    Mostly its local police departments wanting new toys to play with, bigger budgets, all paid for by local GOP politicos tapping into that whole "scary non-white person" thing.

    But the courts are careful. They only deal in fact. Which is why, when the FBI of all groups, says "these guys are dangerously out of control", it will allow to them to order things they otherwise would not.

    - C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

    Half-Century Man

    (5,279 posts)
    10. Same courts just transitioned from the abstract to the absurd.
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:30 PM
    Apr 2014

    Abstract = Corporate personhood via Citizens United.
    Absurd = unlimited financial contributions are not corruptive via McCutcheon et all v. FEC.

    I'll give you the courts didn't initiate the militarization of law enforcement, They merely allowed it to happen without complaint.

     

    davidn3600

    (6,342 posts)
    7. And nothing will happen....
    Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:14 PM
    Apr 2014

    At most... someone, somewhere will take an early retirement and step down. And then the media will forget about it.

    U4ikLefty

    (4,012 posts)
    13. I fear you are correct. After a number of outrageous verdicts (like the Kelly Thomas case)
    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 12:51 AM
    Apr 2014

    I am not hopeful that anyone will see a jail cell.

     

    Nanjing to Seoul

    (2,088 posts)
    12. I wonder if badge sniffers will defend or mimimize this. It's just a few bad apples
    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 12:44 AM
    Apr 2014

    it's one police department. Cops are good.

    Cops are wonderful. They just have a tough job. See, one brought someone two gallons of milk with a huge pained smile on his face.

    JoeyT

    (6,785 posts)
    14. It might've been easier to find the departments that don't
    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 12:32 PM
    Apr 2014

    use unjustified deadly force and excessive violence. To find the ones that do will be like moving a beach a grain of sand at a time. At least they're making a start at it, which is better than their predecessors.

    Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Brutally Frank ...