Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's A 'Let Me Google That For You' Bill
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/let-me-google-that-for-you-act-coburn-mccaskillThere's A 'Let Me Google That For You' Bill
Daniel Strauss April 11, 2014, 11:57 AM EDT17755
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a new bill this week called the Let Me Google That For You Act of 2014 (seriously).
The bill is meant to cut down on "the collection and distribution of government information" by prioritizing using Google over spending money to obtain information from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS).
NTIS, run by the Department of Commerce, is a repository of 3 million scientific, technical, engineering, and business information.
The bill would abolish the NTIS and move essential functions of the agency to other agencies like the National Archives. The bill's name is a play on a snarky website that links to Google's search engine.
"No Federal agency should use taxpayer dollars to purchase a report from the National Technical Information Service that is available through the Internet for free," the bill reads.
The idea behind the bill is to stop federal agencies from spending, say, more than $100 to get government documents if the documents are available online for free.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 644 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's A 'Let Me Google That For You' Bill (Original Post)
babylonsister
Apr 2014
OP
longship
(40,416 posts)1. That's wonderful, I think.
Just trying to consider the possible blowback...
R&K for visibility.
Wounded Bear
(58,618 posts)2. Makes too much sense....
It'll never fly.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)3. Seeing's how google search results are slanted toward commercial, paid political posters and bots...
It's another bill to dumb down Americans, deny them relevant and scientific data and privatize formerly public information. And only being released as news to sell the corporations that sponsored and wrote the bill to be introduced.
It's along the lines of what is being done in Canada to wipe out data, science and reseach that corporations don't want available to the public so they can keep on making a profit while they steal and pollute. No data to refute their crimes, gee whiz.
We're supposed to cheer this as a budget cutting deal based or an oh-so-simple, so-let's-do-it solution for the alleged sake of common sense, when we know there is huge bias in the results.
And to profit billionaires at google and make them the owners of it. It ain't free and instead of a group we paid for to increase the public knowledge, selling us for the cost of packaging the information as a product, we are the product google will be selling.
More proof that we have no vision or ability to reflect on the ramnifications of this loss of public knowledge, as The Idiocracy marches on.
It's along the lines of what is being done in Canada to wipe out data, science and reseach that corporations don't want available to the public so they can keep on making a profit while they steal and pollute. No data to refute their crimes, gee whiz.
We're supposed to cheer this as a budget cutting deal based or an oh-so-simple, so-let's-do-it solution for the alleged sake of common sense, when we know there is huge bias in the results.
And to profit billionaires at google and make them the owners of it. It ain't free and instead of a group we paid for to increase the public knowledge, selling us for the cost of packaging the information as a product, we are the product google will be selling.
More proof that we have no vision or ability to reflect on the ramnifications of this loss of public knowledge, as The Idiocracy marches on.