General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKRUGMAN: "We're giving huge sums to Financial Industry & Receiving Less Than NOTHING In Return"
Three Expensive Milliseconds
Paul Kriugman
New York Times Op-Ed
April 13, 2014 (April 14th, 2014 Edition)
............................
..........if our supersized financial sector isnt making us either safer or more productive, what is it doing? One answer is that its playing small investors for suckers, causing them to waste huge sums in a vain effort to beat the market. Dont take my word for it thats what the president of the American Finance Association declared in 2008. Another answer is that a lot of money is going to speculative activities that are privately profitable but socially unproductive.
You may object that this cant be right, that the invisible hand of the market ensures that private returns and social returns coincide. Economists have, however, known for a long time that when it comes to speculation, that proposition just isnt true. Back in 1815 Baron Rothschild made a killing because he knew the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo a few hours before everyone else; its hard to see how that knowledge made Britain as a whole richer. Its even harder to see how the three-millisecond advantage conveyed by the Spread Networks tunnel makes modern America richer; yet that advantage was clearly worth it to the speculators.
In short, were giving huge sums to the financial industry while receiving little or nothing maybe less than nothing in return. Mr. Philippon puts the waste at 2 percent of G.D.P. Yet even that figure, Id argue, understates the true cost of our bloated financial industry. For there is a clear correlation between the rise of modern finance and Americas return to Gilded Age levels of inequality.
So never mind the debate about exactly how much damage high-frequency trading does. Its the whole financial industry, not just that piece, thats undermining our economy and our society.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/14/opinion/krugman-three-expensive-milliseconds.html?action=click&contentCollection=Opinion%C2%AEion=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article&_r=0
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...is exceeded by his worsening of traffic by canceling a new rail tunnel under the Hudson River.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)It introduced me to the concept of the Money Grid, which is the role that Wall Street is supposed to play - getting capital from people who have it to people who need it. It's a good concept because, in a capitalist system, that's necessary and even beneficial. I don't really have a problem with people making money doing it.
But, it's clear that Wall Street these days is more concerned with tinkering with that grid to make maximum profit for themselves while providing little of value. It would be as if the local electric concern basically built the system to siphon as much of the electricity to their house, regardless of how that effected the rest of the system; and thus there were constant blackouts and brownouts and lightbulbs popping - we wouldn't put up with that for too long- but when it comes to the Money Grid, we are seemingly unable to pass even moderate breaks on the system.
And so they keep breaking the money grid to make enormous profits for themselves.
Bryant
zeemike
(18,998 posts)We get billionaires that we can ooh and aaah over how fabulous their yacht is and how spacious there vacation homes are.
And dream that we can be like them someday...dreams are valuable to the dreamer.
lark
(23,097 posts)can and do hurt us. All the poor folks that vote R because they dream of being rich is a perfect example.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Hurt us hell they are destroying us.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)And the tireless efforts they apply to ensuring corporations are fat, happy and in control.
Just one more reason there is no such thing as a "liberal investor". Only corporatist appeasers waging weekend war.
Weekly, daily, it is all about making them more money and consequently destroying everything that a supposed liberal would stand for.
progressoid
(49,987 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)From 2008...
True, finance has been whupped by presidents before. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, for example. But that was in the quill-pen era when the financial sector was a pup. Today's financial services sector, by contrast, is a grasping, gargantuan combination of banks, stockbrokers, insurancemen, loan sharks, credit-card issuers, hedge fund speculators, securitization mavens and mortgage operators. Over the last five years, financial services has reached a swollen 20-21% of U.S. GDP -- the largest sector of the private economy.
Manufacturing led financial services by 2:1 back in the 1970s, but by 2006 beaten goods production had shrunk to just 12% of GDP.
....
I began writing about these matters with a 1990 book entitled The Politics of Rich and Poor, and in several other volumes since then. Today, the economic negligence of Washington and Wall Street, more than two decades in the making, has led to a multi-dimensional crisis in which this country faces an unprecedented convergence of problems: unprecedented debt, tumbling home prices, reckless money supply expansion, growing inflation, insufficient and expensive oil, and an eroding dollar. Sadly, there may no longer be a plausible way out.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-phillips/the-destructive-rise-of-b_b_94351.html
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)(The original piece is at Harper's Magazine behind a pay wall.)