Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
rhett o'rick's terrific frame (Original Post) grasswire Apr 2014 OP
Yup. We are one. No doubt in my mind nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #1
What part of House of Roberts Apr 2014 #2
Everyone here is anti-oligarchy. tridim Apr 2014 #3
ding ding ding...nt SidDithers Apr 2014 #5
Ding dong would be more like it. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #14
However, there are certain considerations: truedelphi Apr 2014 #6
+1 an entire shit load! Enthusiast Apr 2014 #15
Seriously?? BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #7
If an elected democrat is a republican, then republican is now democrat. Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #10
yup, that is their reasoning Skittles Apr 2014 #11
No, someone who is anti-Democrat is anti-Democrat. tridim Apr 2014 #17
You make my case, thank you. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #8
and some Democrats hfojvt Apr 2014 #12
If you support health insurance instead of health care Doctor_J Apr 2014 #20
I'm sure you mean anti-Obama LondonReign2 Apr 2014 #19
ding ding ding...nt Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #4
Yep. Vashta Nerada Apr 2014 #9
Hillary is a guarantee of the status quo. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #16
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch..... Enthusiast Apr 2014 #13
It is harder and I am not sure some understand the way out of it. Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #18

House of Roberts

(5,168 posts)
2. What part of
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 10:59 PM
Apr 2014

"I wouldn't piss on a Koch if he was on fire", do you not understand?

Is that anti-oligarch enough?

(I might piss on some Republicans, on fire or not.)

tridim

(45,358 posts)
3. Everyone here is anti-oligarchy.
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 11:03 PM
Apr 2014

Anti-Democrat is the real problem on DU. It's cute that Rhett didn't mention it.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
6. However, there are certain considerations:
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:16 AM
Apr 2014

At no time in history is the need greater in terms of questioning basics as to "party leadership." Are the Democrats who are in bed with the Big Money really Democrats?

Be they in bed with the housing and mortgage fraud perpetrated on us, or the Big Pharma rip off perpetrated on it, or Big Military, I don't care which Big Money is involved: If a Democrat has done little for the middle and lower classes, and is a mere "face" used by the One Percent to "help" us accept the rise in the boiling frog pot's water temperature, is that person a Democrat at all?

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
7. Seriously??
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:21 AM
Apr 2014

So someone who wants elected Democrats to uphold Democratic Principles is Anti-Democrat?

Um...

tridim

(45,358 posts)
17. No, someone who is anti-Democrat is anti-Democrat.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 07:56 AM
Apr 2014

Democrats on DU all believe in upholding Democratic principles.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
8. You make my case, thank you.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:37 AM
Apr 2014

Some here are anti-oligarchy only pertaining to Republicans. They will give ALL Democrats a pass. Sadly some Democrats support the oligarchy.

If you support the TPP, then you are supporting the oligarchy.

If you support the XL Pipeline, then you are supporting the oligarchy.

If you support indefinite detention, then you support the oligarchy.

If you support NSA spying on Americans you support the oligarchy.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
12. and some Democrats
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:55 AM
Apr 2014

just do not bother to fight the oligarchy.

I am thinking of newly elected Senator Elizabeth Warren.

She just sat there silently while most of the Bush tax cuts were being made permanent.

So did Senator elect Tammy Baldwin, a member of the progressive caucus. In fact, she joined Paul Ryan in voting FOR it.

I asked that in real time, where the hell were they? http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021880321

Permanent tax cuts for the rich were being signed into law and they were either AWOL or on the WRONG side.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
20. If you support health insurance instead of health care
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 05:37 PM
Apr 2014

If you support for-profit schools in place of public schools

There are a lot of pro-oligarchy DUers

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
9. Yep.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 12:42 AM
Apr 2014

Too little anti-oligarchy.

Look at all the people hoping for Hillary Clinton to run for President.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
18. It is harder and I am not sure some understand the way out of it.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:07 AM
Apr 2014

Electing more Democrats is not, in and of itself, going to change the status quo...although
we want as many Republicans replaced with Democrats. We then need those Democrats
to support the 99% through a host of initiatives and there are too many obstacles that
will continue even if we end up with a majority in the House and Senate..an ambitious
campaign.

For me, it comes down to one issue, lobby money and how we build a movement to
move forward for public funded elections..over turning CU, as well.

Anti-oligarchy will take a greater initiative than merely casting your vote for a Democrat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»rhett o'rick's terrific f...