Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 08:56 AM Apr 2014

If You Can ‘Speak’ with Your Money, Then Why Is It Illegal to Ask For It?

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/if-you-can-speak-your-money-then-why-asking-money-illegal




Money may be protected speech but apparently, speech that asks for money is not.

Two recent legal cases about money and free speech unveil a contradiction in our application of the First Amendment. One deals with the right of the rich to influence politics with a lot of money, the other deals with the right of the poor to ask for a little to buy a meal or bus ticket.

On October 8, the Supreme Court heard arguments in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) that could open the floodgates on unlimited campaign contributions. If McCutcheon succeeds, the case could lift limits on how much money an individual can spend in an election cycle.

If the Court sides with McCutcheon, it could strike down aggregate limits on campaign contributions in the name of free speech. Currently, the donation limit is $48,000 per cycle, which enables giving the maximum amount of money to 18 national candidates per election. Even if the FEC could still limit donations to a single campaign, rich donors would see a new rush of power, gaining influence in more elections. Every politician in the country would basically need to beg this small group to finance their next job interview with the American people.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If You Can ‘Speak’ with Your Money, Then Why Is It Illegal to Ask For It? (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2014 OP
Because that is taking someone else's speech? liberal N proud Apr 2014 #1
Good point. And... Orrex Apr 2014 #2
Yeah, not sure I understand that rationale shanemcg Apr 2014 #3
Isn't it obvious? shanemcg Apr 2014 #4

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
1. Because that is taking someone else's speech?
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 08:59 AM
Apr 2014

And the oligarchs don't like to be bothered by the speechless.

Orrex

(63,199 posts)
2. Good point. And...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:12 AM
Apr 2014

You can also be fired for talking about your speech or asking people about theirs.

Funny ol' world.

 

shanemcg

(80 posts)
3. Yeah, not sure I understand that rationale
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:27 AM
Apr 2014

The government can't violate your rights, but an employer or private individual can do so at will. Too bad, so sad. That's how the cookie crumbles.

Allegedly.

 

shanemcg

(80 posts)
4. Isn't it obvious?
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:29 AM
Apr 2014

Money is speech, ergo, if you have no money, you have no speech.

Now, if that bum FOUND $20, he would then have the power of speech and would be free to panhandle. At least until his $20 ran out.

See?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If You Can ‘Speak’ with Y...