Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:36 AM Apr 2014

"White House Must Be Investigated for Role in Enron’s Fraud"

Blind Faith: How Deregulation and Enron’s Influence Over Government Looted Billions from Americans
Sen. Gramm, White House Must Be Investigated for Role in Enron’s Fraud of Consumers and Shareholders
December 2001
http://www.citizen.org/documents/Blind_Faith.PDF

President Bush’s presidential campaign received significant financial support from Enron ($1.14 million).


Upon assuming office in 2001, Bush promptly scrapped plans put into place by former President Bill Clinton to significantly limit the effectiveness of these countries as tax and bank regulation havens. This action came at the height of high West Coast energy prices, probably allowing Enron to siphon billions to its offshore accounts.


At the same time, the Bush administration and certain members of Congress waged a legislative and public relations campaign against the imposition of federal price controls in the Western electricity market. Such price controls remove the ability of companies exercising significant market share to price-gouge by effectively re-regulating the market. Bush’s opposition to price controls unnecessarily extended the California energy crisis and cost the state billions of dollars.


Require testimony or written answers from key Bush administration officials. These should include Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, to answer questions about whether Enron representatives or their agents discussed policies regarding treaties with tax haven nations; political adviser Karl Rove, to answer questions about Enron’s influence over Bush energy policy; Republican National Committee chairman Marc Racicot, to answer questions about his lobbying efforts before FERC and Congress as a paid lobbyist on behalf of Enron; Vice President Dick Cheney to answer questions about his secret meeting with Enron chief executive Kenneth Lay; and finally, President Bush, to answer questions about his knowledge of Enron’s efforts to influence policy on energy and offshore tax/banking havens.


The Bushes and Lehman Brothers

In the arms race by private-equity firms to line up ever-higher profile "advisers," Lehman Brothers may have just taken the lead. The investment bank hired former Florida governor and presidential son and brother Jeb Bush for its in-house investing arm.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118860733605915338.html


George Herbert Walker IV (born April 1969) is the Chairman and CEO of Neuberger Berman. Formerly a Partner and Managing Director at Goldman Sachs, Walker was recruited to rival investment bank, Lehman Brothers, to head its Investment Management Division, of which Neuberger was a part. Following Lehman's bankruptcy and the announcement of the sale of Neuberger, Walker assumed his present position.

<...>

Walker began his career on Wall Street when he joined Goldman Sachs in the Merger Department in 1992 and six years later, in 1998, became of one of the firm's youngest partners ever.[4] He held several senior positions at Goldman, including co-head of the firm's Wealth Management business, and head of Alternative Investment strategies. In May 2006, Walker resigned from Goldman Sachs to become global head of Lehman Brothers' Investment Management.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Herbert_Walker_IV

Why can't Obama be more like Bush? Who is missing Dubya?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024828575

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"White House Must Be Investigated for Role in Enron’s Fraud" (Original Post) ProSense Apr 2014 OP
Political cartoonists are missing Dubya big time Fumesucker Apr 2014 #1
Yea, Obama has been aggressive with Wall St.... HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #2
Wait ProSense Apr 2014 #3
Neither has been tough on Corporate America... HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #6
This is ProSense Apr 2014 #8
Bush's DU fan club won't like this Cali_Democrat Apr 2014 #4
Forgot to mention Neil Bush ProSense Apr 2014 #5
You do know there were over 100 successful prosecutions for fraud from the S&L crisis? HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #7
Was Neil Bush prosecuted? ProSense Apr 2014 #9
Clinton did not persue criminal charges... HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #12
The BIG DIFFERENCE. Our economy could survive shutting down all the Savings and Loans. Many more okaawhatever Apr 2014 #17
No worries they are here right now Iliyah Apr 2014 #11
It's like living in Bizarro World - then when you call them on their absurdities alcibiades_mystery Apr 2014 #15
Thank YOU! annm4peace Apr 2014 #10
Amen to that. Elizabeth Warren is bringing up a new push to divest banks and investment companies okaawhatever Apr 2014 #18
You make MAtt Taibbi has a sad. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #13
DUrec... SidDithers Apr 2014 #14
Maybe Taibbi, like some on DU, is frustrated with the pace of change. randome Apr 2014 #16
KnR and thanks! sheshe2 Apr 2014 #19
Wow gratuitous Apr 2014 #20

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. Wait
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:56 AM
Apr 2014

"Yea, Obama has been aggressive with Wall St...."

...are you laughing because you realize that the claim about Bush being "tougher" was beyond idiotic?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
6. Neither has been tough on Corporate America...
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:09 AM
Apr 2014

Whom do you think pulls their puppet-strings? Neither shows much interest in prosecuting economic fraud, neither shows much interest in prosecuting pollution, neither shows much interest in protecting worker safety. It remains to be seen if Obama will do anything more than talk inre to union rights, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. This is
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:20 AM
Apr 2014

"Neither has been tough on Corporate America...Whom do you think pulls their puppet-strings? Neither shows much interest in prosecuting economic fraud, neither shows much interest in prosecuting pollution, neither shows much interest in protecting worker safety. It remains to be seen if Obama will do anything more than talk inre to union rights, but I wouldn't hold my breath."

...nonsense. After people jumped on the bandwagon to claim that Bush, who was responsible for the worst financial crisis in more than 70 years, was "tougher," now the claim is "neither shows much interest in protecting worker safety"?

Not only did Bush stand in the way of prosecutions, he did everything to facilitate the abuses, gutting regulations (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024828575) and opposing efforts by Congress to address the issues (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024828575#post4)

Hey, Matt Tabbi.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024832738

There is no friggin comparison.

There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong bill—the strongest in three generations. I didn’t have a chance to vote for it because I wasn’t yet in the Senate, but if I could have, I would have voted for it twice.

http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024812296
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. Bush's DU fan club won't like this
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:57 AM
Apr 2014

Apparently they are nostalgic for the days when corporate America was brought to its knees under Dubya's Justice Department.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
7. You do know there were over 100 successful prosecutions for fraud from the S&L crisis?
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:13 AM
Apr 2014

That was small potatoes compared to the scale of fraud committed leading up to the recent crash. Yet Obama Admin has failed to bring a single prosecution. Not one.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
9. Was Neil Bush prosecuted?
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:23 AM
Apr 2014

"You do know there were over 100 successful prosecutions for fraud from the S&L crisis?"

The S&L crisis was before Glass-Steagall was repealed. President Obama is cleaning up Bush's mess.

Brown, Warren Urge Fed To Address Risks Associated With Bank Ownership Of Physical Commodities
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024831309

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
12. Clinton did not persue criminal charges...
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 08:34 AM
Apr 2014

However, Neil Bush was fined $50,000, prohibited from involevment in banking industry, and he and other directors of the S&L settled out of court for $2.5 million in a suit filed by the RTC. So there were actions taken in civil court. What actions has Obama taken, other than giving the criminals more money and jobs in his administration?

okaawhatever

(9,457 posts)
17. The BIG DIFFERENCE. Our economy could survive shutting down all the Savings and Loans. Many more
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:04 PM
Apr 2014

tellers and lower rung employees lost their jobs than the fat cats who did the damage. There was a calculation made by the Bush admin and Congress that allowing the banks to fail would be worse to the average American than the bailout. We will never know what the consequences of allowing the banks to fail would have been. We do know that thousands more tellers and support staff would have been out of work than fat cat bankers. We don't know if other countries would have loaned us money or what the interest rates would be. We don't know how the loss of investment income would have affected the retirement funds of state and municipal employees, unions, and individual IRAs. If the justice dept, SEC or FBI get criminal charges against a bank tomorrow the bank will lose it's banking license in this country and shut down. Will it be worth it?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
15. It's like living in Bizarro World - then when you call them on their absurdities
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 08:58 AM
Apr 2014

they yabber that *YOU* have "cognitive dissonance" and that *YOU'RE* a "cheerleader."

These people are off the deep end in Obama-hate for serious.

annm4peace

(6,119 posts)
10. Thank YOU!
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:24 AM
Apr 2014

and disclose the info from the Energy summit meetings Cheney had with the Energy CEO's just before the man made energy crisis.

As someone who survived the Central Valley, CA energy crisis and know 1st hand business closed, elderly and sick died because of the heat and children suffered.. it has been something I hope to see. Cheney should be charged as a traitor to his country for what he did.

okaawhatever

(9,457 posts)
18. Amen to that. Elizabeth Warren is bringing up a new push to divest banks and investment companies
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 01:06 PM
Apr 2014

from owning commodities. Let's try to support the effort. If I see any stories about legislation I'll post them here.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. Maybe Taibbi, like some on DU, is frustrated with the pace of change.
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 09:07 AM
Apr 2014

And at not being in the center of it. So they lash out in a new direction hoping to score points. Big fail on Matt's part. It remains to be seen whether he admits that or doubles down on the crazy statements.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
20. Wow
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 04:31 PM
Apr 2014

Talk about a low bar to clear, but no doubt, the Obama administration isn't quite as hand-in-glove with nearly as many corrupt business interests as the Bush administrations. You may color us all really impressed down here.

Doesn't address squat-ah with what is currently going on, but the aid and comfort lent is no doubt greatly appreciated in certain quarters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"White House Must Be...