General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan anyone tell me what Snowden is trying to accomplish?
I really would like to know what the point of this might be.
April 17, 2014, 08:48 am
Snowden calls Putin to talk NSA
By Julian Hattem
Edward Snowden called into a Russian state television program on Thursday and asked President Vladimir Putin about whether Moscow has surveillance programs similar to those exposed by the former government contractor.
The exchange between Putin and Snowden appeared to be a piece of theater crafted by the Kremlin and designed to embarrass the Obama administration amid heightened tensions between the U.S. and Russia over Ukraine.
Ive seen little public discussion of Russias own involvement in the policies of mass surveillance, Snowden, a former government contractor facing espionage charges in the U.S., told Putin via video message.
So Id like to ask you: Does Russia intercept, store or analyze in any way the communications of millions of individuals? And do you believe that simply increasing the effectiveness of intelligence or law enforcement investigations can justify placing societies, rather than subjects, under surveillance?
In response, Putin said that bulk collection programs cannot exist under Russian law.
more...
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/203748-in-response-to-snowden-putin-denies-nsa-like-spying
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 17, 2014, 10:56 AM - Edit history (1)
Snowden is the snitch we need.
babylonsister
(171,035 posts)I can think of other words for it. And there are probably a lot more ways to attain 'justice' than this.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)does the vitriol over Snowden's adjudged wrongdoing any worse than the wrongdoing he exposed?
Why would we be embarrassed by his call-in question and not embarrassed by the activity that caused his, and our, situation?
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Embarrassed for spending on weapons instead of schools, spending on prisons instead of seniors and most of all...
Touting itself as the land of FREEDOM when it's actually the largest most complete SURVEILLANCE state in the history of Humankind.
TBF
(32,004 posts)Putin's a thug and who the hell knows who is paying Snowden (if anyone).
But I don't think those things preclude us from taking a serious look at the NSA and figuring out if all of this data collection is really necessary. Many of us were concerned about the Patriot Act from the get go, and it obviously did not start with the current administration. Why continue Bush's nonsense?
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Lest we look back and see all we've lost.
TBF
(32,004 posts)RandoLoodie
(133 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)Look at how the government treats its citizens, for one.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Vlad is so clearly lying, Eddie has to know that - to even ask the question proves it is theater as even Eddie knows the answer is a lie. Good grief. He is really going to attempt to prove that Vlad's Russia is a better society than the US when it comes to espionage. Come on.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 18, 2014, 11:35 AM - Edit history (1)
The Russian president hosts an annual call in show where anyone can ask him a question. Snowden's question sounds confrontational to me. I'm assuming the calls were screened (just like call-in shows do here) and that the screeners asked Snowden the question he wanted to pose and that the question was checked and pre-fed to Putin. Putin's answer isn't believable, but that's what you'd expect in the circumstances. For someone who's a guest of the country at the largess of the President, that does seem like a very bold thing to do. But then Snowden is all about doing things boldly.
Eta: Snowden's question was apparently not just pre-checked, but pre-recorded.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I don't know how seriously we should take Putins statements that Russia just isn't allowed to spy. I don't know how seriously he takes it (we'll see if Greenwald comments on this).
Bryant
Putin doesn't seem to say they wouldn't, he says they can't, plus some blather about how it is impossible under Russian law. Right.
But I think he is right about the "can't", it's easy to collect the data, but collecting it all is counter-productive. Making the haystack bigger doesn't improve the yield of needles. And analyzing data is expensive, hence the constant search for ways to do it by machine: face-recognition, DNA samples, keyword searches, Google itself.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)It's probable he was groomed from the start.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,864 posts)I kind of doubt that he meant to end up the way he did. But I do think that now he is just a cog in someone else's wheel. And it's a very anti-American wheel.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)directly or indirectly he has to go along with the drift of Putin. All these countries spy, it's survival of the establishment. To me, it was a DUH question to elicit a specific response. That said, I don't agree with all of the spying in the US, I think it's gone overboard ... just saying, I bet he is now a controlled cog. To me, at least, he has limited options if he wants to survive. He could be wiped out easily if he became an irritant to the Russian establishment.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Putin thanks you AND Snowden for playing.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Was inevitable.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....knowing that it was inevitable he would "flip"?
Please.
hack89
(39,171 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Is Putin saying that Russia is forbidden from spying on other countries? Nyet!
The NSA, too, is forbidden from mass collection of domestic data. The one exception is the metadata phone records, which are stored in a lock box unless needed.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)(couldn't resist)
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Polito Vega
(25 posts)Source?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)I doubt it was his idea.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Curious choice of words, Id say.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,864 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)That's what people like him do.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Who would that be? Whistleblowers under the Obama administration?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)"Under duress" those words have meanng. Key in the write up, "piece of theater crafted by the Kremlin."
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Russia sees itself as doing him a favor for shielding him from US justice/CIA, so it expects something in return. He's not really in a position to turn them down.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Nice piece of drama, though. I suspect it took balls.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)going on for eons. That said, I do think the US has gone overboard.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)indicating otherwise, the chips will fall where ever. Think about how the Russian dissenters can use
this in the future.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It isn't "Can anyone tell me what Snowden is trying to accomplish?", as Snowden is being used as a tool. Snowden seems to be just dim enough to be used by much smarter people, while being just smart enough for these people to feel comfortable using him in public.
Putin: "Hey Snowden, if you did this it would be great for you."
Snowden: "Brilliant, I will do it!!!"
On a side note, Snowden is not collecting any of our data and is truly insignificant at this point except to those who want to use him against the US. He is, at this point, a stooge. The NSA is the real problem. Snowden is Putins problem.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)The attempts to marginalize this man keep getting more and more bizarre.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)I'm just laughing at the hypocrisy.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Either side of the spectrum. The problem is the NSA, not Snowden. Some think he needs to be marginalized, some think he is a hero. I go more along the lines of pseudo-hero as his actions have brought to light the blatant disregard of all branches of government with respect to constitutional abuse. Snowden doing what he has done here, at the request of the Putin regime, speak volumes about Snowden the person. He has become a tool. Snowden at this point is insignificant, the NSA is not.
Hekate
(90,556 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,268 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)And "earning his keep" is going to involve being Putin's useful idiot from time to time. He may be participating enthusiastically or under duress. We don't know.
But it is his own choices that put him in that situation.
The irony is delicious. He's helping Russia/Putin try to create the illusion that it does not listen in on phone conversations and read emails and internet posts in their country when their own laws and internal ministers have claimed they do. This all while claiming that he uncovered another government doing those very things and that discovery led him to break numerous laws and upend his life. Now he is an apologist for it in another country.
Anyone who doesn't see this makes Snowden and anything he has claimed and any documents he says he uncovered completely non-credible is a complete shill for Snowden and also non-credible on the subject.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... a country that was not his destination, thanks to US. Now, he is utterly dependent on getting his asylum renewed every year.
Exactly what do you think he should do? Oh I know, come back to the US and face life imprisonment. Well, I have no doubt that is what some of the dumbasses here would do, but he's not that dumb.
babylonsister
(171,035 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)... he has no choice. I'm not even sure what your point is, or if you even have one.
randome
(34,845 posts)Why hasn't he?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)He has no principles, though, which will serve him well. He has connived his way into the global media spotlight. He will keep conniving in order to survive. As we saw yesterday, even if it means being Putin's lackey, he won't mind.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... to blow the whistle on a massive unconstitutional operation then you can speak to others' principles. Crickets, yeah that's what I thought. Not in your past or ever in your future, nothing.
If you have the reading comprehension of a 3 year old you understand my point, he has no choice but to play ball in Russia, that's where the US stranded him.
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)Obviously bored 29-year-old with no loyalty to anything but his ego dupes co-workers into giving him the info he needs to escape from it all and be a bright, shiny object.
If the world ran on your concept of guts there wouldn't be much of one.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)babylonsister
(171,035 posts)I can tell this upsets you. I'm just trying to understand where Snowden is coming from, and I still don't get it, though you haven't provided any info to clarify his stance.
Maybe we'll never know.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)You can see the method and thought process in Wile E.'s actions. You can see what he is trying to accomplish (capture and eat the roadrunner) He even tries to order the right equipment for the job. It just never turns out.
Snowden's decisions and motivations are unclear and not well thought out.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)have done is get to the destination of the country you wanted before releasing any information.
He decided to release the information first, and then start looking for a country for refuge. Not too bright
randome
(34,845 posts)Be well liked.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
Rex
(65,616 posts)Looks like authoritarians are poo pooing all over themselves, how sad but totally expected.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)But if it was one of those metaphorical given-an-offer-he-couldn't-refuse type of deals, at least it makes a tiny bit of sense...
Or maybe at the end of the day Snowden truly is a useful idiot...
randome
(34,845 posts)"Billions and billions of emails..."
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)in the history of mankind seems confusing....
Perhaps you need to spend some time studying the history of peoples and their struggles against authoritarian regimes.
That the "good guys" are currently in charge of these programs doesn't diminish how incredibly wrong they are.
There is no gray area when it comes to the surveillance state.
BTW, I am replying to this thread from overseas, so all replies will be captured and analyzed by the NSA, watch what you say, because they are watching YOU.