Openly Gay Oregon Judge Defends Marriage Ban Because No One Else Will
By Mark Joseph Stern
2014 has not been a good year for people who hate gay people. The Supreme Courts ruling in
United States v. Windsor striking down the Defense of Marriage Act has
swept through the lower courts, slaying every gay marriage ban it encounters. Some states have
struggled to mount principled defenses of their marriage bans; others have
given up entirely. But perhaps the strangest indication of marriage equalitys sudden ascent to inevitability came this week, when an openly gay federal judge was forced to defend Oregons gay marriage ban in his own courtroom because nobody else would.
This bathetic finale for Oregons prohibition was probably inevitable. The relatively blue states anti-gay law is essentially an anachronism, and activists planned to repeal it via statewide vote this November. (Even Oregon Republicans are on board.) But in the wake of Windsor, four gay couples decided to bring their case to federal court, expecting the states attorney general, Democrat Ellen Rosenblum, to defend it. Rosenblum, however, refused,
insisting that the ban cannot withstand a federal constitutional challengeI wonder
what gave her that idea!and expecting another group to step in and defend the ban.
But no one did. That left U.S. District Judge Michael McShane in the slightly awkward position of
defending the ban himself on Wednesday. By all accounts, McShane, who is openly gay, did an
admirable job playing devils advocate, questioning whether the people of Oregon should get a chance to vote down the ban before an unelected judge invalidates it. In fact, McShanes questions were far more incisive than the objections raised by actual gay marriage opponents, whose legal briefs in opposition to marriage equality have been
reduced to gibberish by this point.
Still, the spectacle of a one-sided argument does feel a tad like a charade. Fun as it may be to see a vile law become so unpopular that nobody wants to defend it in court, thats not how justice work in the United States. Hearing renowned advocate Paul Clements argument for DOMA
disintegrate with a single question at the Supreme Court illustrated just how constitutionally untenable these bans are. Oregons defenders of marriage equality had no such moment of clarity on Wednesday.
more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/04/25/oregon_gay_marriage_ban_defended_by_openly_gay_federal_judge.html?