General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor any neo-confederate acquaintance who may wonder aloud if slavery was so bad after all....
-Solomon Northup
http://cwmemory.com/2013/12/14/solomon-northup-on-humane-masters/
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Bigmack
(8,020 posts)... that the slaveholders would hire Irishmen to do the really dangerous stuff. No big loss. Slaves were worth money. Irishmen weren't.
Smart masters didn't abuse their slaves. Well, too badly, anyway, since it reduced their value.
I made sure to point out that the obvious mistreatment of slaves was the worst part, but the most insidious part of slavery was it's measurement of human beings on an economic scale. A field hand was worth so much, but a house slave was worth more. Money, that is.
... and the psychological damage...? No money involved, so according to the monetary value system, no harm done. Right?
... and the damage to families...? Since they were only cattle... and cattle don't have families...no harm done. Right?
My students got the full picture.
hlthe2b
(102,234 posts)whether it be holocaust deniers, those who deny the truth of slavery or any other well documented shameful event in history?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)we're transported to this country in tiny containers. It got worse from there. Slavery is why I roll my eyes when some right winger talks about how great our "founding fathers" supposedly were.