Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 12:13 AM Apr 2014

Pfizer wants to reincorporate in UK, leave its HQ in USA, but avoid paying U.S. taxes

Source: New York Times

Pfizer, the maker of best-selling drugs like Lipitor and Viagra and a symbol of business prowess in the United States for more than a century, no longer wants to be an American company.

On Monday, Pfizer proposed a $99 billion acquisition of its British rival AstraZeneca that would allow it to reincorporate in Britain. Doing so would allow Pfizer to escape the United States corporate tax rate and tap into a mountain of cash trapped overseas, saving it billions of dollars each year and making the company more competitive with other global drug makers.

... Pfizer points out that it would retain its corporate headquarters here and remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It also says that the main rationale for the deal is broadening its portfolio of drugs, and saving money through combined operations with AstraZeneca.

Still, a deal would allow it to follow dozens of other large American companies that have already reincorporated abroad through acquiring foreign businesses. They have been drawn to countries like Ireland and the Netherlands that have lower corporate rates, as well as by the ability to spend their overseas cash without being highly taxed.

Read more: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/pfizer-proposes-a-marriage-and-a-move-to-britain-easing-taxes

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pfizer wants to reincorporate in UK, leave its HQ in USA, but avoid paying U.S. taxes (Original Post) Newsjock Apr 2014 OP
Nothing new oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #1
They should be told that they will need to pay taxes on the money that they have kept TexasTowelie Apr 2014 #2
Does that work both ways? Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #4
I have no problem with that at all. TexasTowelie Apr 2014 #5
It Seems Like A Trend..... global1 Apr 2014 #3
Why is it more advantageous to them in the UK? Shouldn't they also be paying taxes here? LeftishBrit Apr 2014 #6
Lots of reason Sgent Apr 2014 #9
Race to the bottom. At this point, snot Apr 2014 #7
Corporations are people - soulless, immoral, people with no regard for anyone else. reformist2 Apr 2014 #8
 

oneofthe99

(712 posts)
1. Nothing new
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 12:17 AM
Apr 2014

Until the IRS tax code is completely tossed out and rewritten stuff like this is the norm.
We can't have lobbyists involved in our tax codes ...

TexasTowelie

(112,140 posts)
2. They should be told that they will need to pay taxes on the money that they have kept
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 12:19 AM
Apr 2014

overseas, then not be allowed to sale any of their products (or AstraZeneca) in the US unless there are no acceptable alternatives available.

Why should any company be allowed to conduct business inside the US unless they are willing to pay taxes on the profits that are made?

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
4. Does that work both ways?
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:01 AM
Apr 2014

Should US companies be forbidden to export things unless they are paying tax in other countries?

TexasTowelie

(112,140 posts)
5. I have no problem with that at all.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:07 AM
Apr 2014

It may be against the concepts of free or fair trade, but I'm pragmatic enough to know that trade is neither free or fair.

global1

(25,242 posts)
3. It Seems Like A Trend.....
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 12:28 AM
Apr 2014

some Walgreens shareholders were urging Walgreens to do the same a couple of weeks back.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
6. Why is it more advantageous to them in the UK? Shouldn't they also be paying taxes here?
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:21 AM
Apr 2014

Sounds like something fishy is going on, and both countries are getting scammed - probably legally, unfortunately.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
9. Lots of reason
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 05:30 AM
Apr 2014

The big two:

UK only taxes them on UK based income, not all income worldwide
UK corporate tax rates are lower

Currently they have money overseas from overseas profits. To make use of that money (including dividends) they either have to invest it overseas, or repatriate (and pay 35% tax) the money to the US. If they were a UK corporation then they could use the money without being subject to the repatriation tax.

If they listed their company on the NYSE they could pay US dividends w/o paying a repatriation tax (although the people receiving the dividends *might* owe more taxes than if they were qualified dividends).

Quick edit: UK corporations have to pay taxes to the US on US profits, but don't owe them on (for instance) Japanese profits.

snot

(10,520 posts)
7. Race to the bottom. At this point,
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 04:58 AM
Apr 2014

it's hard to hope for more than that the bottom be reached quickly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pfizer wants to reincorpo...