General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPfizer wants to reincorporate in UK, leave its HQ in USA, but avoid paying U.S. taxes
Source: New York Times
Pfizer, the maker of best-selling drugs like Lipitor and Viagra and a symbol of business prowess in the United States for more than a century, no longer wants to be an American company.
On Monday, Pfizer proposed a $99 billion acquisition of its British rival AstraZeneca that would allow it to reincorporate in Britain. Doing so would allow Pfizer to escape the United States corporate tax rate and tap into a mountain of cash trapped overseas, saving it billions of dollars each year and making the company more competitive with other global drug makers.
... Pfizer points out that it would retain its corporate headquarters here and remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It also says that the main rationale for the deal is broadening its portfolio of drugs, and saving money through combined operations with AstraZeneca.
Still, a deal would allow it to follow dozens of other large American companies that have already reincorporated abroad through acquiring foreign businesses. They have been drawn to countries like Ireland and the Netherlands that have lower corporate rates, as well as by the ability to spend their overseas cash without being highly taxed.
Read more: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/pfizer-proposes-a-marriage-and-a-move-to-britain-easing-taxes
oneofthe99
(712 posts)Until the IRS tax code is completely tossed out and rewritten stuff like this is the norm.
We can't have lobbyists involved in our tax codes ...
TexasTowelie
(112,140 posts)overseas, then not be allowed to sale any of their products (or AstraZeneca) in the US unless there are no acceptable alternatives available.
Why should any company be allowed to conduct business inside the US unless they are willing to pay taxes on the profits that are made?
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Should US companies be forbidden to export things unless they are paying tax in other countries?
TexasTowelie
(112,140 posts)It may be against the concepts of free or fair trade, but I'm pragmatic enough to know that trade is neither free or fair.
global1
(25,242 posts)some Walgreens shareholders were urging Walgreens to do the same a couple of weeks back.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)Sounds like something fishy is going on, and both countries are getting scammed - probably legally, unfortunately.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)The big two:
UK only taxes them on UK based income, not all income worldwide
UK corporate tax rates are lower
Currently they have money overseas from overseas profits. To make use of that money (including dividends) they either have to invest it overseas, or repatriate (and pay 35% tax) the money to the US. If they were a UK corporation then they could use the money without being subject to the repatriation tax.
If they listed their company on the NYSE they could pay US dividends w/o paying a repatriation tax (although the people receiving the dividends *might* owe more taxes than if they were qualified dividends).
Quick edit: UK corporations have to pay taxes to the US on US profits, but don't owe them on (for instance) Japanese profits.
snot
(10,520 posts)it's hard to hope for more than that the bottom be reached quickly.