Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs the DOJ Forcing Banks to Terminate the Accounts of Porn Stars?
Is the DOJ Forcing Banks to Terminate the Accounts of Porn Stars?
This past Monday, porn star Teagan Presley arrived home in Las Vegas from yet another whirlwind strip club appearance tour and found a letter from her bank.
Chase was closing her account, which was listed under her legal name, as well as the account of her husband.
When Presley went to the bank in person to ask why, she was told its because shes considered high risk.
And then they told me that they canceled my husbands account too, because our social security numbers are linked, Presley told VICE News. They told him that it was because Im a notorious adult star. Which is funny, because Im kind of a goody-goody in the business, and Im not even doing porn anymore.
...
In May 2013, CNBC wrote about actress Chanel Prestons sudden account termination at Los Angeles City National Bank, and porn studio head Marc Greenbergs lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for violation of fair lending laws. Greenberg wanted to refinance his longstanding home loan, and said a JP Morgan vice president told him he was being declined for moral issues.
https://news.vice.com/articles/is-the-doj-forcing-banks-to-terminate-the-accounts-of-porn-stars?trk_source=homepage-in-the-news
This past Monday, porn star Teagan Presley arrived home in Las Vegas from yet another whirlwind strip club appearance tour and found a letter from her bank.
Chase was closing her account, which was listed under her legal name, as well as the account of her husband.
When Presley went to the bank in person to ask why, she was told its because shes considered high risk.
And then they told me that they canceled my husbands account too, because our social security numbers are linked, Presley told VICE News. They told him that it was because Im a notorious adult star. Which is funny, because Im kind of a goody-goody in the business, and Im not even doing porn anymore.
...
In May 2013, CNBC wrote about actress Chanel Prestons sudden account termination at Los Angeles City National Bank, and porn studio head Marc Greenbergs lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for violation of fair lending laws. Greenberg wanted to refinance his longstanding home loan, and said a JP Morgan vice president told him he was being declined for moral issues.
https://news.vice.com/articles/is-the-doj-forcing-banks-to-terminate-the-accounts-of-porn-stars?trk_source=homepage-in-the-news
It's not like they could claim Greenberg was a risk of non-repayment. "I'm sorry sir, but our actuaries just don't think sex will be all that popular in the near future."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1577 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is the DOJ Forcing Banks to Terminate the Accounts of Porn Stars? (Original Post)
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
OP
This is not much different from closing the accounts of women who have abortions
cthulu2016
Apr 2014
#4
Orrex
(63,189 posts)1. They were worried about premature withdrawal
Not enough had currency, perhaps.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)2. Nonsense.
The money shot requires a withdrawal.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)7. SCHEDULING ORREX AND NUCLEAR UNICORN FOR DUO ASSKICKING
*EGREGIOUS*
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)3. Well, they did SAY there would be penalties for that...
lame54
(35,277 posts)8. The penalties come from not withdrawing
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)4. This is not much different from closing the accounts of women who have abortions
Some folks will think its funny, because people are mostly about eight years old, but a bank closing someone's account because of that bank's view of a person's morality is astonishing, if true.
An established history of bank fraud, or criminal money laundering? Sure. Being generally immoral? No.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)9. It's worse because it's the government leaning on the banks.
A competing bank would probably say, "We'll take your money!" but not if the DOJ is playing Puritan Police.
unblock
(52,173 posts)5. ah, just the thought of a jpmorganchase bankster lecturing customers about moral issues!
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)6. Not a new thing- IIRC that's how Insex got shut down n/t