Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 04:13 PM Apr 2014

Is the DOJ Forcing Banks to Terminate the Accounts of Porn Stars?

Is the DOJ Forcing Banks to Terminate the Accounts of Porn Stars?

This past Monday, porn star Teagan Presley arrived home in Las Vegas from yet another whirlwind strip club appearance tour and found a letter from her bank.

Chase was closing her account, which was listed under her legal name, as well as the account of her husband.

When Presley went to the bank in person to ask why, she was told it’s because she’s considered “high risk.”

“And then they told me that they canceled my husband’s account too, because our social security numbers are linked,” Presley told VICE News. “They told him that it was because I’m a notorious adult star. Which is funny, because I’m kind of a goody-goody in the business, and I’m not even doing porn anymore.”

...

In May 2013, CNBC wrote about actress Chanel Preston’s sudden account termination at Los Angeles’ City National Bank, and porn studio head Marc Greenberg’s lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for violation of fair lending laws. Greenberg wanted to refinance his longstanding home loan, and said a JP Morgan vice president told him he was being declined for moral issues.

https://news.vice.com/articles/is-the-doj-forcing-banks-to-terminate-the-accounts-of-porn-stars?trk_source=homepage-in-the-news


It's not like they could claim Greenberg was a risk of non-repayment. "I'm sorry sir, but our actuaries just don't think sex will be all that popular in the near future."
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
4. This is not much different from closing the accounts of women who have abortions
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 04:20 PM
Apr 2014

Some folks will think its funny, because people are mostly about eight years old, but a bank closing someone's account because of that bank's view of a person's morality is astonishing, if true.

An established history of bank fraud, or criminal money laundering? Sure. Being generally immoral? No.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
9. It's worse because it's the government leaning on the banks.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 04:30 PM
Apr 2014

A competing bank would probably say, "We'll take your money!" but not if the DOJ is playing Puritan Police.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the DOJ Forcing Banks ...