General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUpon which I SMASH ALL OF THE THINGS
Memo to every gomer out there who got fucked over by their high school's failure to teach Civics and never bothered to figure this out on your own:
HEY DICKHEAD.
The First Amendment protects your freedom of speech from one (1) thing: GOVERNMENTAL INTERFERENCE with you speaking your mind.
If you go into a bar and bellow NI*GER NI*GER NI*GER FUCKING NI*GER and get your ass handed to you for it, that's not a Free Speech 1st Amendment issue, you fucking useless hopeless dumbfuck dickwad puddle of tepid Fail, because the bar is NOT THE GOVERNMENT. That's the marketplace working it out.
Sterling fans have taken to Twitter with ERMAHGERD HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS gibberish. Read the fucking Bill of Rights, you piddling Derp-riddled reason why we can't have nice things.
The NBA is NOT THE GOVERNMENT.
Your right to free speech ends exactly where I can fuck you up for life in public for being a dumbass.
I am not the government, either. Read a book, you clown car.
Dumb Twitter Users Rage Against Death Of The First Amendment
http://deadspin.com/twitter-users-rage-against-death-of-the-first-amendment-1569415262
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)People that would fit right into an Idiocracy world. Probably a lot of near miss Darwin Awards in that group.
H2O Man
(73,528 posts)then it must be in the bible.
Recommended.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"If you go into a bar and bellow NI*GER NI*GER NI*GER FUCKING NI*GER and get your ass handed to you for it..."
Further (and contrary to popular half-witted bumper-stickers), I don't think I'll ever fight for that guy's right to do so, either.
kcr
(15,315 posts)Seriously, I'm with you. As soon as I see the words "I may not agree with them.." I know what's coming, and I go into "Gawd, whatever" mode.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Not like they're being thrown in jail or tortured or anything. Now that would be real persecution.
I guess in this context, "I may not agree with them..." means "I probably do agree with them but I don't have the guts to say so."
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But I think Mr. Sterling shouldn't profit obscenely. Pay him back what he originally paid for the Clippers, adjusted for inflation. Not that lavish CPI inflation those Social Security poshes get; no, the chained-CPI that the wealthy think is good enough for the likes of us.
A little bit of sauce for the ganders, as it were.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Yours? Who "pays him back" and gets to decide how much he is allotted? Under what law? What theory?
Taking one red cent from him on account of his stupidity IS MOST ASSUREDLY a violation of his 1st Amendment rights.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Mr. Sterling has a private contract with the NBA. That contract says what he can do, and what the NBA can do. If the contract says the NBA gets to seize all his wealth, then the NBA gets to seize all his wealth.
The 1st amendment only restrains government. Government is not at all involved in this situation.
Rex
(65,616 posts)WOOOSH!!!
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Because if it DOESN'T (and it doesn't), some use of force would be required to effect the confiscation of wealth.
And whose force would that be?
Yup. The government.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Why are you pretending it does?
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)That wasn't my point.
Rex
(65,616 posts)This is just business as usual or do you know something the rest of us don't?
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)and then decrying the guy's wealth. One has nothing to do with the other. If someone wants his money taken away, or for him to make no money off the sale, they'll have to point to specific NBA provisions that allow that sort of thing, or they'll have to admit they really don't support free speech.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Okay I see what you are saying now and agree with that - nobody deserves to be forced (illegally by the government) into the poorhouse, just because they are a racist asshole. There has to be laws and regulations involved - if personality entered into it, then half the country would be in trouble I would bet.
He should face whatever financial troubles that were created by his own mouth, whatever legitimate courses of actions those are.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I have no patience for people who cluck about rights, and then attempt to decide what a just punishment should be for something they JUST CLAIMED is protected.
I will go ahead and guess, probably correctly, that the NBA cannot confiscate substantial wealth from an owner. Not without a court battle, anyway.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I would also state the NO government has the right to tar and feather any person, 'just because'...THAT is a slippery slope, something we on DU would expect out of a dictator and a nation like Russia.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)The management and players could very well sit next season. No player would ever dog it during the
playoffs, but I can see them boycotting the team until it's sold. That would be a nightmare for the NBA.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)If the contract between Sterling and the NBA authorizes the NBA to impose fines, then the NBA can impose fines.
If Mr. Sterling refuses to pay those fines, the NBA can turn to the courts to enforce the private contract.
The fine is still not imposed by the government, making it not a 1st Amendment violation.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)then you say "if."
Response to Dreamer Tatum (Reply #26)
jeff47 This message was self-deleted by its author.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)That's why they're imposing a $2.5M fine.
The contract also says they get final approval on any sale. They could use that clause to keep him from getting much profit.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Would you want your HOA to force your neighbor to sell his home for $5G because he painted it an unapproved color? Probably not.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)But there isn't.
kmlisle
(276 posts)I think other laws would apply here
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I'm listening.
kmlisle
(276 posts)http//
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'm hardly in a position to dictate to a bunch of wealthy greedheads how they handle their affairs. But if the other 29 franchise owners decide to enact a punitive measure on Donald Sterling based on their own rules and by-laws, that's up to them. I'm just offering them a little friendly advice.
After all, by whose authority did the Commissioner of the NBA decide to fine Sterling some pocket change and "ban" him from running the team he owns? So nice, though, that even overrich philandering racists have folks to defend them from the normal and natural consequences of their actions.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Good thing you're here to defend it!
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Donald Sterling paid $12.5 million for the Clippers back in 1981. If forced out of the league by the NBA owners, Sterling will likely get somewhere between $600 and $750 million for the franchise.
That would be a profit very nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars.
Boo fucking hoo for Donald Sterling...
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Who's crying for him?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I would have gone with "N****R", but that's just me.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)the caps lock key on your computer. Thanks.
And thank you for stating what everyone here already knew. There's no need for scream headlines.
Number23
(24,544 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)for being a dumbass."
We are all comfortable with this? While what Sterling said was reprehensible, and it's understandable that the NBA and his team might want to cut him loose for business reasons, that does seem a step to far.
A lot of what made the Red Scare so terrible wasn't just the Government going after people, it was independent red-baiting organizations and local chamber of commerces.
Bryant
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)You got a mouse in your pocket?
You're a member of DU, an online community that exposes and calls out stupid every minute of every day.
Look around.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Maybe they have and I haven't noticed it. That is a pretty evocative phrase isn't it?
Bryant
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)is what I do.
Would you say that Sterling is now fucked for life to a degree?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Nope.
He's got plenty of money left. Which means plenty of people will happily kneel before him.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)If money actually bought happiness, there wouldn't be so many hateful rich folks swinging their gold-plated lead pipes at people in our public sphere.
He has been paid in the coin of public shame. He was already rich, so the fine/sale is irrelevant.
And P.S. Getting pissed about the fine only displays rank ignorance about deep-down racism. They could fine this dickslap ten billion dollars, and you think he'd suddenly awaken to a new understanding? No, he won't. EVER. The money doesn't matter, because no amount of money will change his mind. He has, however, been purged from the institution he was polluting with his presence. The only thing that will cure our culture of this kind of racism is already in place: mortality. These fucks, quite simply, have to die off. There is no other cure for calcified racism beyond death. Fining the fucks only reinforces the martyr syndrome this turd will wrap himself in...until he is wrapped in his shroud.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but then there's the fact that they breed... the children, the grand children that they taught, the generations just go on and on. Sterilization maybe?
I'm not being serious, but dieing off hasn't worked. That's been going on for ???? ever?
As trite as it sounds it's education that matters, but that is a commodity that just can't stand up to entertainment these days. Educations costs time, effort, money and most of all facts. Entertainment makes money, there's no effort, and facts are just an annoyance.
I don't have the answer to the dilemma.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I'd probably agree. You move from that to a larger argument about non-governmental attacks on freedom of speech. I understand the argument that the Constitution doesn't protect freedom of speech from private attacks on it; but I don't think that makes private attacks on free speech acceptable.
Bryant
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I am not a big fan of hate speech.
I generally don't call people "gomer" or a "fucking useless hopeless dumbfuck dickwad puddle of tepid Fail".
Especially not if they have only said something that other people are calling "hateful".
It's popular here though, much to my chagrin.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)perfectly.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)after all, isn't this basically what the Nazis thought about the Jews? That they were "fucking useless hopeless dumbfuck dickwad puddle of tepid Fail"
There are not too many people that I would say fit that description, and I think they would have to DO something awful rather than just SAY something awful.
Something like this guy
http://www.kansascity.com/2014/02/21/4839630/suspect-in-springfield-child-abduction.html
HE is an (expletives deleted) puddle of tepid fail. Somebody who defends Sterling's right to free speech? Not even close to the same league.
Although the odd part about that guy is that, at age 46, he apparently was NOT always like that. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/20/missouri-missing-girl-accused-killer/5655831/
I mean, after 45 years of seemingly normal life, just one day he is driving down the street and sees a little girl and thinks "hey, I am gonna kidnap, rape and kill her. That's always been on my bucket list."
Or did he spend many years thinking murderous and evil thoughts, but pushing it down, keeping it hidden, until one day he lost control of his inner demons?
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)Not sure what your point is -- your post makes little sense to me, especially in defense of this bigot. Seems like a big stretch to me.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Yes, yes, I know. Sterling is the latest witch who has been hunted up by the M$M. Anybody who does not join in casting aspersions at him is probably a witch too, or at least a witch-lover.
And therefore also an (expletive deleted) puddle of tepid fail.
Funny about Sterling, I just read the other day that the NAACP gave him a lifetime achievement award in 2009.
And they were scheduled to give him another one this year
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nba/clippers/2014/04/28/donald-sterling-clippers-naacp-alice-huffman/8411441/
Whatever bad things Sterling was doing must have been so hidden that the NAACP did not realize they were giving an award to a witch.
If this post makes little sense, read it again with the word "bigot" used instead of "witch".
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)a ton of money, after he was sued for discrimination based on race in his real estate dealings, and was attempting to rehabilitate his image and reputation. The NAACP should be ashamed for accepting the money. Regardless, I'm done with you. IMHO, you should choose your battles more wisely.
(snip)
ESPN host Bomani Jones is very familiar with Sterling's history of racism. Back in 2006, the sports writer and pundit wrote a column titled "Sterling's racism should be news" following the Department of Justice suing Sterling for housing discrimination. Sterling allegedly refused to rent apartments he owned to African Americans, Latinos and people with children in the suit and, though he denied the charges, agreed to a settlement of $2.765 million in 2009. A separate housing discrimination lawsuit dates back to 2003. (snip) More at link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/29/bomani-jones-donald-sterling_n_5233565.html
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but wouldn't you know it, I cannot find my copy of "Mother Night".
Yeah, it is tilting at a windmill trying to convince an angry mob to put down their haterade.
But like JFK said - every man should try.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think you're confusing one's own bigotry being outed publicly with "Sterling is the latest witch who has been hunted up by the M$M (sic)."
lame54
(35,282 posts)those doing the handing are breaking the law by physically assaulting you
if the bar tells you to leave and don't come back - that's not violating you at all
Now - walking into that bar and shouting that may result in an ass handing with no witnesses - not recommended
spanone
(135,816 posts)so is the NBA
Maven
(10,533 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)n/t
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)As you kick their asses over their blindly repeating The Bush Crime Family lies.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)Well said, especially the part about " you fucking useless hopeless dumbfuck dickwad puddle of tepid Fail."
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)Thanks for the laugh (and for the timely civics lesson)!
New Orleans Strong
(212 posts)...is a Top Commentator on C.P. Pierce's Blog. Oh!! The fun. Thank you William Pitt for everything you write - Delish.
DesertDiamond
(1,616 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...but you have to remember, these are morons. And as we all know by now: ''A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.'' Here, we can see why that's true. But in the end, it is a lot of hollering and gnashing of teeth, signifying the last dreg's attempt to hold-off change. They can't deal with it and must be swept along with it.
And so they shall, just give it time.
- Ignorance is its own punishment.
K&R
[center]
What did you expect?
"Welcome, sonny"?
"Make yourself at home"?
"Marry my daughter"?
You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers.
These are people of the land.
The common clay of the new West.
You know... morons.
[/center]
randys1
(16,286 posts)Yes, if you are a right-winger, you are a complete total fucking moron.
Unless you are rich and are a greedy motherfucker, but you cant be middle class and republican and smart, cant do it.
And as to freedom of speech, you can say whatever the fuck you want you stupid fucking rightwing moron, but if I dont like it I can boycott your NBA team or your website or whatever and unless the GUBBMINT tells you NO you cant say that, you dont have a free speech issue you dumb fuck you.
(If I can find a community college class on Assertiveness, I will let you know and we can both take it)
and one more thing, on behalf of Jordan Davis,
TURN THE MOTHERFUCKING MUSIC UP!
pinto
(106,886 posts)Bluntly on point.
progressoid
(49,969 posts)They're all OPPRESSED!
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)with which he so readily ranted his condescending, racist, hateful and mysogynist attack at his mixed heritage girlfriend and face the
consequences. he did all of this to himself and his karma is being served.
Gothmog
(145,086 posts)I share the OP's frustration. The First Amendment does not apply to this case at all. Only an idiot would be making the claim that Sterling's First Amendment rights were violated.
Shandris
(3,447 posts)I suppose we'd better hope we never get taken by surprise on an issue, huh. The danger in this kind of thing isn't what's happening to some racist bastard no one likes and who deserves everything he gets, it's what happens when a conservative inevitably returns to power with some social backing. Only an -idiot- would think it will never happen again.
Relying on social power alone is a good way to end up under the guillotine when the mobs inevitably turn.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)His racist comments threatens the profits of every NBA owner.
His fellow owners do not take lightly a threat to the obscene profits they take from their sports franchises.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Made me lulz
IronLionZion
(45,411 posts)especially since she was palling around with black basketball stars and his wife is suing. The dude is his own punishment. Yet somehow, I bet he will make millions by selling the team.
It won't make him happy though. He doesn't look like a happy camper.
vlakitti
(401 posts)Thanks, Mr. Pitt. It was a lot of fun throughout and many of the comments were hilatious.
Kicking the really evil in the testicles is always a job worth doing.
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)Actually, Mike Greenberg, the Jewish half of that team, explained it Monday morning. But since he's on cable, he used nicer language.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)The NBA was facing millions of dollars in lost ad revenue and sponsorship deals. That is the main driving force nowadays.
If any of us said something that cost our employer significant money, we all know what would happen. Sterling is just a larger case, and just because he owns a team doesn't mean he is the highest boss.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)The government is also obligated to protect your right to speech from other entities who would interfere.
Not to shield you from criticism, of course, but consequences that would chill that right are indeed in the government's bailiwick.
haele
(12,646 posts)Ever since he's been an owner, most of the players bail as soon as they become free agents because of his egotistical 'baggery and the only non-draft pick players his team could usually get were the guys no other team would sign.
The Clippers had suffered for the longest time because he had his good-ol'-boy front office filled with sycophants and weak coaches who would bail as soon as they found out he was a major; neither group would stand up for the players when he'd play his plan"big house/field hands" games. Doc Rivers was an anomaly - a buffer between him and "his team" and had really pulled the Clippers around.
The question the player's union has always had was "Where was the NBA when he was pulling this shit earlier?"
Other owners had been fined for pulling similar crap; Sterling, a "big-shot lawyer" and real estate investor long known for racist and misogynist attitudes before he bought the Clippers hid behind his money and the cachet those millions - now billions gave him.
Haele
mrsadm
(1,198 posts)riverbendviewgal
(4,252 posts)opposed to Resident based Taxation which the rest of the world uses.
New laws (FATCA) are now causing problems for Americans who live and work abroad. Some Americans who lived in other countries and are citizens of those countries for decades all their lives.
Did you know if you were a border baby , born in a USA hospital and only was in the USA during that time in the hospital when your were born and your Canadian parents took you back the next few days after your birth to grow up, go to school and work only in Canada - you must file US taxes for the rest of your life?
All green card holders as well, even when they leave. And some snowbirds. They must file US taxes and report all t heir bank accounts where they live.... The US considers them foreign even though they are in the not American town they live in.
I know for a fact this was never taught in the US educational system in the 60s.
I don't think one should be taxed where one does not live and one is a citizen of another country , such as Canada.
I know many of DUrs think I am a asshole.