General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGO NADER! Wants Obama impeached!
Woohoo! Nader rocks!
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/ralph-naders-america-impeach-obama-decriminalize-drugs-libertarians-progressives-unite-110418813.html?vp=1
onenote
(42,700 posts)Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)impeached? sigh.. so sad
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)So...
Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)Hekate
(90,660 posts)Gothmog
(145,152 posts)Nader is responsible for Citizens United, the gutting of the Voting Rights Act and latest slam of affirmative action. Nader has done enough damage and should be ignored
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Stockman
And Kudos to EarlG for this.....
Gothmog
(145,152 posts)Nader is just as crazy as Lyndon LaRouche
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Don't be a wingnut (right-wing or extreme-fringe)
Democratic Underground is an online community for politically liberal people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office. Teabaggers, Neo-cons, Dittoheads, Paulites, Freepers, Birthers, and right-wingers in general are not welcome here. Neither are certain extreme-fringe left-wingers, including advocates of violent political/social change, hard-line communists, terrorist-apologists, America-haters, kooks, crackpots, LaRouchies, and the like.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Gothmog
(145,152 posts)I am calling voters in my precinct to make sure that they do not vote for Kesha Rogers at the May 27 run off.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)someone thinks you're serious.
I voted to leave it. Results coming up.
Edit: Results...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024887372
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Advocating impeachment of president Obama
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Apr 29, 2014, 07:50 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm assuming that the cheering is intended as sarcasm. If not, then I assume that posting privileges will be revoked.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Whoever alerted this obviously has no idea who Drunken Irishman is, nor the fact that he's one of the biggest Obama supporters around. The post was sarcasm. The alerter is way out of his/her element.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OP is OTT sarcasm leave it alone
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Obvious sarcasm is obvious.
I was #7
Sid
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)funniest shit i have seen so far tonight!. even I have been around here long enough to know how how fond Drunken Irishman is of Obama! must be a new person or a person being purposefully obtuse just to be a dick!
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I'm embarrassed now, Didn't realize the sarcasm.
Cha
(297,171 posts)Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Whoever alerted this obviously has no idea who Drunken Irishman is, nor the fact that he's one of the biggest Obama supporters around. The post was sarcasm. The alerter is way out of his/her element.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Sorry, I didn't think you were being sarcastic. My bad.
Cha
(297,171 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So thanks for that.
Hekate
(90,660 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Rand Paul is a moron and no one should be making an alliance with him. On top of that, calling for Obama's impeachment is ridiculous.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)a major hit. Maybe it will finally finish off the old fucking lunatic.
Cha
(297,171 posts)crack me up! Rofl.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)No real surprise here.
Hekate
(90,660 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)And since Nader made the difference between Bush II clearly losing or losing close enough to steal the 2000 election, it only makes sense to have a proxy impeachment with Bush II's successor taking the hit. Perhaps Nader can arrange for his newfound right-wing buddies in state legislatures and Congress to take time out from their day-to-day chores of voter suppression, obstructionism, and cowtowing to religious extremists, in order to persuade those on the other side of the aisle to join this happy Crusade!
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)for not only putting forth the idea of an alliance among progressives with someone like RAND PAUL (someone who wants to dismantle the safety net, opposes women's rights, and supports voter ID laws), but also going so hard after Obama and likening Democrats to the GOP when only one of the two major parties has really been BSing around. Think about it--you don't see Democrats blocking jobs bills, wasting taxpayer money through countless health care repeal attempts, trying to start wars, or roll back rights of various disadvantaged groups. Also, specifically what part of the (U.S.) Constitution has this President violated?
This I why I never did like Nader, and why I can't take too seriously anyone who still supports people like him. Here is an individual who is so deep in the fringe that he essentially is meeting with the other side (hello, Rand!). He profits from hyperbole and attacks from the left. Even as someone who ran as a Green, he is strangely unable to talk much about the areas of agreement that he has with Obama and Democrats (the major party that is closest to his ideology). From this, I get the impression that he believes Rand Paul would be a more qualified leader than Obama (or HRC), and it's all because of just two or three issues they just happen to agree on.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And keep on going, you hypocritical old idiot!!! Go far from the public sphere, so we don't have to listen to your pathetic bullshit anymore!