General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums13-Year-Old Willow Smith Poses on a Bed With 20-Year-Old Shirtless Man
Folks across the country have issued a collective sanctimonious gasp over news that Will and Jada Smith's 13-year-old daughter Willow posed for some moody bedroom photos with shirtless 20-year-old actor Moises Arias. Disappointingly (but unsurprisingly), much of the backlash has focused on Willow's behavior or her parents' failure to control her rather than the adult man photographed alongside her.
The shots aren't new to the net; Arias (who some may know from a recurring role in Hannah Montana)posted them to his Tumblr last month without so much as a peeplike utterance from the web. It wasn't until yesterday, when Willow posted the photos to her Instagram account, that people started going really fucking nuts.
full: http://jezebel.com/13-year-old-willow-smith-poses-on-a-bed-with-20-year-ol-1573000364
i wouldn't have a problem with somebody over the age of consent (16 is it in most states?) in the photo with the Arias. But 13? C'mon.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)alp227
(32,004 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)And in whose mind should this affront take place?
--imm
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Lots of shirtless men hanging around there!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Further, we don't know what relationship these photos convey. Arias is a friend of Willow's brother; maybe she's known him for years and sees him like a platonic nonthreating male relative. And 13-year-old girls and 20-year-old nonrelated males are allowed to make nonsexual physical contact.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)Eyebrows were raised when a photo of Willow Smith lying in bed with actor Moises Arias was noticed on one of Kylie Jenner's Tumblr accounts on Tuesday.
But the singer's parents - actors Will and Jada Pinkett Smith - have no problem with their 13-year-old daughter posing that way with the 20-year-old actor, according to a Wednesday report from TMZ.
A source said the Smiths, who are both in their 40s, think Willow is 'old enough to make decisions on who she hangs with, even innocently in bed.'
Sources close to the married couple said they think their daughter is 'very mature' and think she has not 'crossed the line.' The black-and-white shots are an 'expression of art,' they beleive.
Moises is not a new face in the Smith family. The Hannah Montana star has been best friends with Will and Jada's 15-year-old Jaden for 'many years.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2622711/Will-Jada-Smith-no-issues-daughter-Willow-13-lying-bed-Moises-Arias-20-hes-family-friend.html#ixzz314MTy2Yd
Response to uppityperson (Reply #2)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)that is a good hobby and involves pins which might appeal to her not so nice nature?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Squinch
(50,901 posts)anything sexual to me.
MattBaggins
(7,897 posts)to make any conclusion what so ever about them
jeff47
(26,549 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)JI7
(89,239 posts)i thought the pics were going to be something like the purity ball creep pics.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Maybe she isn't straight, maybe he isn't, etc.
Now if he had been holding open a door for her we could assume he was straight and was doing so because he wanted sex with her. But in this case they are just laying on a bed.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)I don't see the big deal with the photo. It tells no story at all but leaves that up to the viewer.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)Think of the children!
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)nt
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)monmouth3
(3,871 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)If it comes to light later that she was victimized by this guy, her guardians should have culpability in the crime, imho. Until then I would yield to their judgment until it is demonstrated to be bad.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I realize some people on DU will disagree with me, but I have a problem with a 20 year old man taking shirtless pictures with a 13 year old girl. He is a grown man and she is a child. If he is just a friend, he can put his shirt on and sit in a chair. I do not think it is Victorian Era thinking to think a 20 year old man should not be sitting shirtless on a bed with a 13 year old girl.
JI7
(89,239 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)I realize he is a friend of her brother. That is why I said he could put on a shirt and sit on the chair.
JI7
(89,239 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)JI7
(89,239 posts)especially if they are still young .
whathehell
(29,026 posts)and ages.
JI7
(89,239 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)Deal with it.
former9thward
(31,925 posts)At those ages the age gap is enormous.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)of way too many.
JI7
(89,239 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Trying to make everyone else think there is something terrible going on with two friends hanging out.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Judging by the OP and others on the thread, it seems I have a lot of company.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)me, and those on the internet referenced by the OP "sebd their minds to the gutter"...
Get your panties out of a knot -- This is just a mild difference of opinion (No one has called the photo 'obscene'
or pornographic) and it does NOT merit the nasty, personal attacks you and and many other
"defenders" of the photo are hurling at those of us who don't see things your way -- Talk about "baseless judgememt"
You all need to grow up and learn to tolerate disagreement with some modicum of civility.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)More like a hot Manhattan afternoon in a loft with no window AC unit.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)a lot of young men on the coast run around shirtless wearing jams and flipflops. and 13 year old girls often hangout with their bros and their friends they have grown up with.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Why don't people get outraged over things worth getting outraged about?
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Probably her brother.
But ehrmagerd, they're on a bed, and other people have sex on beds, therefore they are having sex on the bed. Or something.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Models under 18 pose nude. There was a small uproar about it in an English fashion blog I follow.
13 is pretty ridiculous to pose with a 20-year-old dude. I'm surprised Will and Jada allowed it. On the other hand, if she intends to pursue modeling, 13 is a good age to start.
They're both clothed, so it's a meh from me.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)I'm surprised Will and Jada allowed it".
Yes.
"On the other hand, if she intends to pursue modeling, 13 is a good age to start"
There's really no "other hand" -- She could pursue modeling in an entirely different,
age-appropriate context...You got right the first time.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,867 posts)If you think a shirtless man = sexual, that's on you.
enough
(13,254 posts)Which apparently is what they are.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)It's the little girl lying on his legs, duh.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,867 posts)I must have forgotten. It's possible to touch someones leg without getting aroused you know.....The only thing "sexual" about this photo is what you're projecting on it.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Grow up.
redqueen
(115,101 posts)The shots aren't new to the net; Arias (who some may know from a recurring role in Hannah Montana)posted them to his Tumblr last month without so much as a peeplike utterance from the web. It wasn't until yesterday, when Willow posted the photos to her Instagram account, that people started going really fucking nuts.
Over a pic that shows nothing sexual.
What a sad spectacle.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)but I haw haw'ed right out loud when I read the comments:
Who the hell reads Moises Arias' Tumbler?
response: ikr
For those who don't know he played one of THE most irritating characters on Hannah Montana (probably the most irritating I've seen on kid's television). I have 4 daughters so I'm well versed in Hannah Montana.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)when my daughter was 13 I sure wouldn't let her lay in a bed with a man or even a boy her own age. Maybe this was just a photo shoot but it still doesn't seem right. And no, it's not the same thing as people on a beach.
How many people find these pictures okay but are opposed to the Purity Balls? I think they are both wrong.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I find that both sexist(why aren't boys pledging their virginity to their mothers?), and just...strange. Its a new, religious/cultural phenomenon that seems creepy because of two things, the pledging of virginity seems far too sexual, and two, it portrays domineering parenting as a good thing.
I don't see how that is in any way comparable to an innocent photo, you are removing the context from the photo, inserting your own sexual issues onto it, and then claiming its wrong because of that. The Purity Balls provide their own, explicit and creepy context.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)It's not like there's anything remotely provocative about the picture. Very strange...
whathehell
(29,026 posts)The real problem is a 13 year old lying on a bed with a shirtless 20 year old man.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)What if Will Smith were standing right there? Wouldn't that drastically change the context of the picture?
MADem
(135,425 posts)If that's "sexy" I think some people have a very pathetic idea of what constitutes "sexy." They look like they're watching cartoons.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)If Will were standing there it might change the context.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,867 posts)What's your obsession with making non-sexual situations sexual?
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Insecure much?
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Michael Jackson, Woody Allen and Roman Polanski all did it. BIG WHOOP!
Get off your high horses.
Shes more than capable of handling herself.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,867 posts)That's a pretty serious allegation. Maybe we should ask the girl herself if she was victimized? She seems to think not.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)What a shirtless 20 year old man does behind closed doors with a 13 year old girl on a bed is NONE of our business. Geez get off your high horses people, like Michael Jackson once said:
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)A 13 year old girl and a 20 year old man should not be 'lounging' together on a bed for any reason. The nly way that woukd be acceptable is if they were siblings.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)penultimate
(1,110 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Not like she was "posing on a bed with a shirtless man."
Someone with a camera was clearly in the room. She doesn't look "seductive" -- she looks tired, and he looks comfortable, not "lustful."
The 20 year old is apparently best friends with her fifteen year old brother.
I think there are a lot of things that are worth worrying about, but I think a bunch of Hollywood kids who don't--for a change--look like they're doing anything wrong (Miss Willow is entirely dressed) isn't very high on my list.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Totally different peer groups.
MADem
(135,425 posts)they are in the same "biz," the older one is young for his age and the younger one is old for his age, and they have known each other personally and professionally for many years now.
Apparently the twenty year old had a role in the Hannah Montana program.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)As I recall the girls who were dancing with their fathers at the Purity Ball were fully clothed too, yet most of us found it very creepy. There were obviously other people at the ball taking pictures but we still felt something was wrong with it. We didn't see anything in particular going on but we had that feeling it was wrong. But a 20 year old man laying in a bed with a 13 year old girl seems perfectly okay? Would you all be okay if your 13 year old daughter was laying in bed with a man?
JI7
(89,239 posts)until they find a husband and to commit to not have sex with anyone else.
the whole thing is just creepy. the pics were creepy because we knew what the subject matter was.
in the pic of of this op we see 2 people on the same bed and we know the guy is a friend of the girl's brother . so we just see it as people who are hanging out unless there is anything we don't know. it's all normal .
we are making a leap in our thinking if we feel the girls are substituting their fathers for sex. We don't like the way the fathers look at their daughters in the still shots we've seen. We don't like that the girls consider their fathers to be their boyfriends or husbands or whatever the heck they're considered to be. The girls don't appear to be pressured into it. They look happy but we feel it's creepy. However, we have no proof that anything abusive is going on. Those are their fathers and yet we worry for those minor aged girls.
Now we have this minor aged girl laying in a bed with a man. Does it really matter that he's the friend of her brother? Most girls that are sexually abused are abused by somebody they know. Somebody they might start out trusting.
I don't know, both scenarios seem twisted and wrong to me. I wouldn't have allowed my 13 year old daughter to lay in bed with a man. And I would have asked my adult son what the hell he was thinking if I had seen him laying in a bed with a 13 year old girl.
JI7
(89,239 posts)it's just fucking creepy. it's what we know. i'm not claiming the fathers are molesting the daughters or anything like that. but the whole thing is fucking creepy regardless.
in the op pics i have been in many situations where a similar snapshot could have been taken . i remember many times hanging out with some people on the bed or lying around somewhere else.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)but if you're male, after you became a man, did you lay in bed with 13 year old girls? Remember, this guy is 20, he's not a kid.
And yes, those purity balls are creepy to me too!
JI7
(89,239 posts)and there were times usually when it was some family get together and you would have a bunch hanging out in some bedroom including on the bed .
bananas
(27,509 posts)You wrote:
because the purity balls are all about sex , it's all about girls substituting their father
until they find a husband and to commit to not have sex with anyone else.
Sounds like you're saying the girls have sex with their fathers.
I didn't read the purity ball threads, is that what DUers were actually saying?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Hollywood reporters are going to have a heart attack trying to chase her around town...
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)but she's not my daughter.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)With photos that encourage pedophile activity in adults. It also teaches 13 year olds it is OK to act in a sexually risky manner with adults.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)And I have to wonder how many of those people would think it was okay for their spouse to lay in bed with an adult of the opposite sex, after all, they're just chillin' right? LOL
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)they have a problem with that? After all, its not like they are having sex or behaving unfaithfully.
If you have issues with such innocent activities, then there must be some serious trust issues in your relationship.
Of course, bear in mind that in our apartment, our couch in the living room is a futon that is decidedly uncomfortable, and if either me or my SO have anyone over, and we are watching a movie together, it will most likely be in one of the bedrooms, the "mancave" has a twin bed(and HDTV), also doubles as my office, or the master bedroom. Neither room has chairs in them, nor room for them, unless you take out the beds.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)General MRA style misogynistic characterisation of (female) spouses.
Insistence that it is OK for others to allow children to engage in risky behaviours
Insistence that such activities are "innocent" and carry no risk
And lastly, you are implying that you would lie on your bed with a 13yo girl - is there any way I can inform CPS about the potential risk you pose to girls?
You are a piece of work!
polly7
(20,582 posts)How you can twist the words and intent of others to reflect your own distorted views and then use them to stoke outrage - is sick.
You should stop.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)People sit at the same distance on the couch all the time.
Besides, back in college a group of friends would all sit basically shoulder to shoulder in the dorm room watching tv/video games/movies and whatnot until we'd pass out in the wee hours of the morning. I'm sure there was even a time or two a leg brushed another leg! But it's not sexual. And my boyfriend at the time never touched another guy in a sexual manner or he wouldn't be my boyfriend (and vice versa).
intaglio
(8,170 posts)to be on a bed with a 13yo girl? If so please be prepared to receive many proposals of marriage from sexual predators who would love to marry with an enabler of abuse.
BTW when you were in college, were you 13 years old? Did you have many 13yo passed out on these beds?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)For instance, I spent a short period of time in Hawaii. I don't think I wore a shirt for ten minutes during that time if I didn't have to. It is socially acceptable there to walk around "half naked". It's not sexual. It's comfortable.
If I was married, I don't think I would need to order my husband to not sit near younger female friends without a shirt on. Primarily because my husband would not be a pedophile. But also because he would be gay. And secondarily, I don't see people getting bent out of shape if it was a 13 year old boy and a 20 year old friend either. Why? Because it is assumed that in a heteronormative society that they will not engage in sexual activities. The same is true of mixed gender groups, but there is an irrational fear that for some reason Joe Sixpack will just out of the blue want to rape a girl. That's a silly and irrational fear. If you know the young man and trust him, and have no reason not to think he might rape someone, then it really isn't a big deal at all. Very few guys find 13 year old girls attractive, and it takes a very sick person to try something.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)And what was she doing that was sexually risky?
Would this help?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)and you are saying that there is no risk to the girl of being sexually assaulted - or are you an idiot who believes a 13yo can give informed consent to sexual activity.
As a hobby do you make jokes about battered women, rape, murder and holocaust?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Men are not sex starved proto-humans, incapable of non-sexual relationships with members of the opposite sex. Had it been a 20 year old women, no one would have cared.
And at what point does this photo suggest that she was battered, raped, murdered, or in any way affiliated with the holocaust? I'd sure like to know.
And for the record... they got ONTO bed not INTO bed. There is a difference.
Clearly the parents know this young man, and feel it is a safe environment for their daughter. I am fine with that.
And again I ask what this photo has to do with pedophilia?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)You would be happy for a 13yo to go to a neighbours house and play happy families with a half naked guy on a bed. For the record not IN the bed - ON the bed. Or does sexual assault only occur when people get under blankets, presumable so God doesn't see?
Next let's dispose of your nonsense that this concerns only Willow Smith, it doesn't: it concerns girls and their families who do not perceive the risk of such behaviour and who will add this photo shoot to the cultural background that friends are safe.
You also seem to have the stupid idea that if the family know the young man with whom their 13yo daughter is friends she will be safe: you are aware that the vast majority of child sexual assaults are committed by family and friends?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)1. They had known each other personally for several years
2. In that time, he had never done anything to her of a sexual nature
3. Her parents have full confidence in nothing happening, people who heretofore have never shown signs of neglect toward their children
4. There was at least one other person in the room
5. They were art photos not a real scene caught in photo. They were planned images
6. Nothing of a sexual nature is happening in the photo
7. Having a shirt off does not imply sexual activity.
8. They weren't in bed. They were sitting on a bed.
9. The existence of a bed does not imply sexual activity.
10. He has never been accused of being a pedophile.
11. She has never shown signs of sexual abuse and seems genuinely comfortable around him.
I could go on, but I've given this as much time as I'm willing. The fact is two people can pose for photos without being sexual active with each other. You see what you want to see.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Do you have anything reasonable to contribute to this discussion, or just wild accusations and conclusions?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)The family have allowed their daughter to demonstrate to other 13yo girls and older men that it is acceptable for young girls to play games on a bed with an older man.
Also, as observed above, the vast majority of child sexual assaults are committed by family and friends.
This photo shoot increases risk
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)age of majority. At least not unsupervised.
I don't see how the photo shoot increases risk.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Any more than you would see how the publicity of groupie culture harmed and enabled the sexual assault of many children. Indeed I am sure you are happy to give Jimmy Savile, Paul Gadd, Iggy Pop et al the benefit of the doubt because, mostly all they were doing was being photographed and lying on couches aor beds with under-age girls, indeed they were hardly guilty of Child Sexual Abuse at all.
But as long as you keep your private fantasies festering inside your skull I see no problem at all.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)There is nothing sexual in that picture.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)The picture may not be sexual to you (but beware there are a lot of wierdos out there) however the point is not the sexuality within the image. The point is the visible example it sets to underage children, their parents and the friends who would like to pose in the same way.
It increases risk by normalising a particularly behaviour which can then be exploited by an abuser.
JI7
(89,239 posts)sexual assault could happen if someone is walking alone somewhere .
intaglio
(8,170 posts)if the child is lying on the abuser's bed, the abuser is partly unclothed, and both the child and the child's parents view that situation as risk free.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)But I do not believe this picture harms anyone and to assert because i don't see it the same way as you.....that according to you:
perfectly content with photos that encourage pedophile activity in adults....is absurd.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I have said that it makes situations that allow pedophile activity seem more normal and hence the report of the abused both less believable and less likely.
As you are an abuse survivor the following bits of imagined dialogue may require a trigger warning. Sorry I hate trying to get into the mind of abusers
.
.
.
.
.
.
"It's OK, babe, guys cuddle girls all the time - you know, like Willow and her friend, - and you thought those photo's were cool,"
"Oh, we were only cuddling - like Willow and her brother's friend - sorry if your daughter thought it was wrong,"
"We were having a tickle game - and she asked me to take off my shirt like Willow's friend - I didn't see anything wrong,"
"She's up in my room asleep - I think she had a nightmare though, don't worry I'll be there when she wakes up."
/Shud-d-d-d-er
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Sorry, but you seem to have an active imagination.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)maddezmom
(135,060 posts)And it is disturbing that you would go there because of a difference of opinion over a photo.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)maddezmom
(135,060 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)Bullshit may stink but it is more useful than your post because it encourages flowers to grow
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)to being a pedophile.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)That you were happy to lie in your bed in your apartment with, guests, and asserted that if you thought that such if behaviour with a 13yo girl was acceptable I would want to inform CPS about the risk you posed.
Are you now saying that you view lying on your bed in your apartment with a 13yo girl as acceptable and not in the least risky?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)What risk are you talking about here?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)has any bearing on this thread at all? This thread is about how these photographs teach 13yo children (and the parents of such children) that lying on a bed with a much older, half naked man is an acceptable behaviour.
I say this photo shoot is, at the very least, irresponsible.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)ON EDIT: Frankly, I think this is called projection.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I pointed out that this thread concerned a 13yo girl and that if you performed those same behaviours with a 13yo I would want to report you to CPS.
That is not slander just a statement of fact.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)And I will say that we did have a Super Smash Bros. Melee tournament in the room I'm talking about, that means that I, my fiancee, and her two nieces, aged 14 and 16 were all on the bed, at the same time! OMG, report me, if you dare.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I stated that if (note the conditional "if" you performed those actions with a 13 year old I would have a right (and probably a duty) to so report you.
You have also quoted a hypothetical case as an invitation for me to report you.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)But if you performed the actions I outlined then a child would be at risk.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Hell she wasn't even leaning against the unclothed body part which was his torso. I can imagine the erhmigawd if she had been leaning against his bare arm.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Parents who think it is normal for such activity to take place are placing their children at risk.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)As for the rest of your comment about parents, I will just link to my other reply to you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4924290
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Despite all the caveats.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Everything isn't a potential case of abuse. If you look at the pic he isn't even touching her (other than his knee).
Atman
(31,464 posts)Intaglio seems to be trying to create hysteria where none belongs. I couldn't believe the pictures when I first saw them. Like, THIS is what all the fuss is about? I grew up on the beach. We went to the grocery store, hell even went to school, wearing less clothing than this. Your own personal hang-ups about the human body don't make another person a pedophile.
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Pornography generally requires photographers too --- and no, I'm not saying this
picture amounts to porn..It's just a tad suggestive and something I wouldn't be comfortable
with my 13 year old daughter doing.
Atman
(31,464 posts)The girl is doing nothing but hanging with a friend. Would it make a difference if they were on the carpet in the living room in front of a TV? NOTHING is going on...they are both dressed...women are not even required to wear shirts in New York City, why does it bend you out of shape that a man is shirtless here?
Sherman, set the Wayback Machine to 1600!
whathehell
(29,026 posts)you and the photo's other "defenders".
Project much?.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)It was your unsupported assertions that I was calling bullshit on.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Please tell
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)You are one sick person.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I also noted that you seem to think it is acceptable for 13yo children to be alone on the bed of a half naked, older man.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)He was shirtless, if he's like most guys, like me, I go shirtless all the time when I'm at home, hell I only wear pants when we have company over.
And, here's the key, the ones who get to judge if its acceptable or not would be the parents, the friend and the 13 year old girl. Again, you seem to be sexualizing something that wasn't sexualized by the participants.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)when the photographer, who was likely her brother since they are best friends, was also there.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)and it is the image that presents a 13yo lying on a bed with a much older man and that is the fantasy being presented, not the reality of a photo shoot. Do you picture all of the film crew present when watching scenes from Iron Man? Of course you do not.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)I have stated that 13yo girls apparently alone with 20yo men are not healthy images to project. To counter that you chose to highlight your behaviours with an adult. In response that I pointed out that acceptable behaviours with an adult are not necessarily acceptable with a 13yo girl.
To get round this you have resorted to special pleading.
Please note
[font size="4"]At no point have I said you are guilty of such actions, just that if such actions are committed they place a child at risk[/font]
Note: also I have not resorted to the ad hom that really, you are protesting your innocence far too much. I have avoided that because I do not believe it and it would distract from your unacceptable argument that children with older men are not at risk.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Only one person in this subthread seems to fantasizing.... And it is creepy.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)It was a teenager hanging out with her brother and her brother's friend, apparently watching TV, which someone took a picture of. You are projecting something in your head into a situation where it didn't exist.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Ok she was younger, 9, but the abuse continued until she was 15. No adult in the family believed her and, by report, the brother went on to abuse his own daughter (this first is anecdote but RIP, Kim)
What about the young girls in Rochdale who were used and prostituted by guys 20 - 30 years old? No-one believed them either.
What about that wonderful man, always working for charity, working with hospitals letting kids be photographed with him and assaulting kids for years because no-one believed those brave enough to talk because Jimmy Savile was such a kind man
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)No? Didn't think so. Have a nice day.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I said it would make it easier for abusers to portray their behaviours as acceptable. Just as Kim's brother portrayed to her that sex for a 9yo was normal because her parents had left her in his charge, just as the Rochdale abusers could rely on the disbelief of Childrens Services, just as Jimmy Savile chose his victims because they could not complain.
JI7
(89,239 posts)be alone with his daughter. because it increases the risk of sexual abuse.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I double god damn dare you to suggest there was anything sexual in nature about it. Double god damn dare you.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Do you hang round shirtless with 13yo girls? I think not
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)growing up, her being 6 years younger, and me staying there even after starting college, I left my room without my shirt on many times. A couple of times, when I didn't know anyone else was there, I even, *gasp*, left my bedroom in only underwear. That lead to quite a bit of embarrassment.
So from when I was a kid till I was about 19-20 or so.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Did you normalise unacceptable behaviours as acceptable? If you had had these younger persons alone in your room then you would need to have been reported to CPS because the greatest risk of abuse to children comes from family and friends.
BTW, you are now resorting to anecdotal evidence in an attempt to prove how harmless you are ...
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)deeper into this hole.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I am saying that if you indulged in behaviour that could lead to abuse you would need to be watched.
There is reality and then there is the hypothetical.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Okay, maybe you didn't state it outright but it is there. So is the implication about those of us that don't see the same as you do in the photo and it is offensive, not only as a rape survivor but as the mom of a 13 yr old girl.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I gave a hypothetical where an adult acting in the same way with a 13yo as he does with another adult could be classed as abusive behaviour.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)every relationship is sinister. Many people just grow up as homies & that's it. Many of us had friends that were like family to us & would do anything for our siblings as well & treat them as such.
They are FL kids we don't do much in the clothes dept ever, I can't get my son to wear a shirt to save his life. But I'll be sure to let him know about the implications it can lead to by not wearing one.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)You really should delete those.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)ie only having a bed as a comfortable seat in his apartment and that guests often shared that bed with him, presumably in a non-sexual way.
I pointed out that he did not do that with 13yo girls but that if he did I would want to report him to CPS.
That is not an accusation, it is a statement of an action I would take if I believed Human_Activist did perform such abusive behaviours. This is an assertion of the type of actions I have taken in the past to protect the vulnerable.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)You enjoy falsely reporting people to authorities, do you get your rocks off that way?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)1) I said that you have owned to acting in a certain way with adult friends;
2) I have said that this thread does not concern the actions of adults but the actions of minors, specifically 13yo children;
3) I averred that if you acted with a 13yo in the same way as you do with adults I would want to report you to CPS.
If this last case pertained to reality I would have such justification but I am not saying this case is the actuality.
You have attempted to draw a parallel between your, presumably, innocent behaviours and the behaviours approved by this photo shoot, if you don't like me pointing out the foolishness of your parallel then don't make it
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)Note I said "portrayed" and "risky".
The concept that informed the idea of this photo shoot in itself is unacceptable because it seeks to portray risky behaviours as normal.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)granted, she was 2 months old, I was babysitting, and she already did something that was very nasty to my shirt at the time.
The worst thing though was she has a grip like a titan, I don't have many chest hairs, and I had fewer after she was done with me. lol
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Or intaglio might have reported you to the authorities. some of the stuff in this thread has me SMH.
Response to Humanist_Activist (Reply #107)
Post removed
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)because it is a serious subject. There are too many cases of child abuse for this not to be serious. I am not accusing anyone of actual abuse but all responsible adults have to be aware of the possibility.
Pictures such as those mentioned in the OP normalise situations which make abuse more possible and hence make the abuse harder to detect.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)I would hate to live in your world.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I shudder to think what this person would have done upon catching me at the beach or the pool with my fiancee's daughters, carrying them around on my shirtless back and all!
whathehell
(29,026 posts)Sorry, but you already "live in his world".
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)whathehell
(29,026 posts)Have fun..
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)as me being "supervised" then no.
Why? Are you projecting again?
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Are you trying for another vacation? What on earth is your problem?
intaglio
(8,170 posts)I said that if he acted with adolescents the way he acted with adult that (hypothetical) case would amount to child abuse
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)But as long as you keep your private fantasies festering inside your skull I see no problem at all.
Or were you supervised?
In spite of your trying to insist that wasn't what you said, that was exactly what you said.
I'm glad to see a jury finally caught on.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I've been in similar situations with younger sisters of my friends, all watching tv in my friends bedroom or something. I didn't have my shirt off but there was nothing sexual about it and I DARE you to act like there was.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)What is the problem? meh
Fearless
(18,421 posts)But because it isn't, people are going crazy. The photos are not sexual. They aren't doing anything. They are happy. What a world we live in where people assume that the only thing on the guy's mind must be sex.
GoCubsGo
(32,073 posts)Everything has always got to be about sex, even when it isn't. Sad.
Warpy
(111,124 posts)and therefore utterly blameless when they go after barely pubescent little girls.
And for the terminally dense,
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fearless This message was self-deleted by its author.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)If 'the naughty bits' are covered, exactly what makes it sexual? Hell, even if he were fully nude, that pose wouldn't necessarily be sexual. If they were both fully nude it might not be sexual - they might both be naturists for all we know. Lots of people just don't like wearing clothes. I know a couple of people with fibromyalgia who spend a lot of time nude because there are 'fibro days' where wearing clothes just hurts too damn much.
Nudity != sex.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)with each other as long as they both agree to it. A whole different ballgame when one is an adult and the other is a 13 year old kid. Get real.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Entire families run around nude and interact with other nudists of both genders and all ages.
Me, I'm too insecure to go anywhere nude in public, my body is hideously unaesthetic.
Of course, in this instance, the kid was already fully clothed, and the guy was every bit as dressed as you often see guys run around. I would guess the Smiths have a giganto pool, so the male friends and family might run around topless a lot.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)But hey, if you'd be okay with your 13 year old daughter laying in/on bed with a man, I guess you just have a whole lot more trust than I do.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)that I would extend trust to long term friends of the family, no matter their age or gender, and not automatically assume they were sexual predators.
Not just any 'man' off the street, but somebody the family has known for quite a while, with no known history of perviness, that is.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)If the guy is a close family friend it's not exactly abnormal.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)ecstatic
(32,641 posts)Never get too relaxed. Of course the photo looks innocent. But that doesn't mean that inappropriate things aren't happening. At 13, I had grown men expose themselves to me and say inappropriate things. Men who my parents knew and possibly trusted. I never mentioned it to them, and luckily it never advanced to full blown assault, etc.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)I really don't see the big deal
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)that she's the daughter of 2 well known and well paid actors and all she has is a dinky twin bed in her bedroom. I am presuming of course that it is her bedroom that the photos were taken in. If it was in Moises' bedroom, then dude - at least spring for a full size bed - trust me, it's more comfortable for two. Unless of course you add a large, cuddly, wussy greyhound to the mix.
MineralMan
(146,248 posts)Boredom. I'm afraid I can't see anything ominous in either photo, which were probably taken by the kid's brother.
Rex
(65,616 posts)How incredibly petty of them, that they had to add that he was GASP...shirtless!
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)There is nothing in the picture that suggests anything sexual but people are so f***ed up in their own minds, they project all of their own fears/insecurities/fantasies on other people and freak out over nothing.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)He's an adult male with a minor aged female laying in bed with him.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)Did you have any older brothers? Did his friends ever hang around with you?
Why are people saying that he's a instantly a rapist because there's a young girl laying next to him? That's such a reach of an assumption that I don't even know where to start.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)that she is a sex object and he is a rapist. Great.
Would it be more appropriate if she was wearing a burka so he didn't get those urges?? lol.
Sometimes this place (DU) drives me crazy.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)You don't know who else was in the room, you don't know the context, you know NOTHING about it beyond a snapshot. You have a sick mind.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)That said, I'm not sure this is a situation that's anyone's business outside that of the Smith family.
Willow is 13. She probably has a crush on this guy. Maybe more...
Moises Arias is a long-time family friend of the Smiths. If anything beyond a friendship has transpired between Willow and Moises, I would suspect that Will and Jada already know about it and have counseled their daughter accordingly.
Whatever the intimacy level between Willow and Moises, I highly doubt that the kid is stupid enough to rape the daughter of one of Hollywood's most powerful families.
To imply that Will and Jada Pinkett Smith don't know what goes on with their daughter is to suggest that they are either too stupid, or too self-absorbed to care about Willow's welfare. For anyone paying attention, the history of this family tells quite a different story.
Willow Smith is an extremely independent individual and I choose to respect her autonomy. Yes, she's 'only' 13, but she's vibrant, creative and very talented; her energy shines and it does so within the purview and close management of her parents.
The idea that she might be enamored with a 20-year-old friend of the family isn't really a stretch to imagine. I trust her parents to guide her through the hormone years. If Moises is a threat to Willow... if he's a predator and Willow has suffered in any way for it, I wouldn't want to be him.
It's clear that Will and Jada love and protect their children. The details should be left up to Jada and Will...and Willow.
I think they've got this!
TYY
sendero
(28,552 posts).... to waste on this might I suggest you GET A LIFE.
StarryNite
(9,434 posts)just sayin'...
sendero
(28,552 posts).... this fucking idiotic thread won't go the fuck away. It's absolutely pathetic to give two shits about what some random kid does.
herding cats
(19,558 posts)To me they look like candid shots of people hanging out. I don't see anything sexual in them. There's no contact between the two or anything sexy about the photos.
What I do have a problem with is people saying these photos somehow make Willow a slut, or that she's going to become a slut. Where did that come from?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Geez man. I thought I'd seen it all. Though I don't recall being shirtless (mainly because being so skinny, I wasn't comfortable being shirtless), I can't count how many times I've been in similar situations when I was young teenager-young 20 something guy, hanging out with my best friends who had little sisters and little brothers. They'd come in and hang out while we were doing whatever. I'm almost certain I've even been on the same bed with girls just as young when I was probably just as old, watching tv, with my friend sitting on a chair or in the floor or something. Its not a big deal.
Come to think of it, my wife's sister who is 15 years younger than me has probably sat on the same bed or couch that I was on, wearing pajamas and such. Its completely innocent. There was nothing sexual about it.
People need to get their minds out of the gutter and stop jumping to conclusions.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Is this Democratic Underground or Perverted Minds Underground? This thread is a real eye opener. In a very sad way.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)that is my opinion.