Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,004 posts)
Wed May 7, 2014, 04:58 PM May 2014

13-Year-Old Willow Smith Poses on a Bed With 20-Year-Old Shirtless Man

Folks across the country have issued a collective sanctimonious gasp over news that Will and Jada Smith's 13-year-old daughter Willow posed for some moody bedroom photos with shirtless 20-year-old actor Moises Arias. Disappointingly (but unsurprisingly), much of the backlash has focused on Willow's behavior or her parents' failure to control her rather than the adult man photographed alongside her.

The shots aren't new to the net; Arias (who some may know from a recurring role in Hannah Montana)posted them to his Tumblr last month without so much as a peeplike utterance from the web. It wasn't until yesterday, when Willow posted the photos to her Instagram account, that people started going really fucking nuts.

full: http://jezebel.com/13-year-old-willow-smith-poses-on-a-bed-with-20-year-ol-1573000364

i wouldn't have a problem with somebody over the age of consent (16 is it in most states?) in the photo with the Arias. But 13? C'mon.

226 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
13-Year-Old Willow Smith Poses on a Bed With 20-Year-Old Shirtless Man (Original Post) alp227 May 2014 OP
What is the age of consent for sitting near a shirtless man? morningfog May 2014 #1
lol cyberswede May 2014 #5
How young is too young to sexualize a person? nt alp227 May 2014 #16
What does sexualize mean? morningfog May 2014 #20
the socratic method still works Supersedeas May 2014 #192
To sexualize -- or to BE sexualized? immoderate May 2014 #27
57, apparently. n/t LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #21
Better keep those 13-year-olds away from public swimming pools! Art_from_Ark May 2014 #196
I like the last bits from the article. I don't see the problem. uppityperson May 2014 #2
Will and Jada Pinkett Smith have 'no issues' with their daughter Willow, 13, lying in bed with Mois big_dog May 2014 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #175
Your disruptive. get a new hobby! hrmjustin May 2014 #176
Aw dang, missed the sociopath again. Maybe she should start an insect collection? uppityperson May 2014 #177
Lol,. hrmjustin May 2014 #179
I didn't see anything wrong with those photos. They look very platonic. It doesn't indicate Squinch May 2014 #3
These photos are too small a snap shot in time MattBaggins May 2014 #4
Beaches must utterly horrify you. (nt) jeff47 May 2014 #6
+2014 Ha -great reply!! lunasun May 2014 #8
space on the beach and the modern swimsuit aren't so roomy Supersedeas May 2014 #206
those pics could be from any group of family or friends that are just hanging out JI7 May 2014 #7
People need to get a life maddezmom May 2014 #9
Would people be upset if the photo was of her and a woman? The Straight Story May 2014 #10
Exacatly right. Well stated. misterhighwasted May 2014 #33
there was similar outcry when a younger miley cyrus was draped over her dad's lap for a posed photo dionysus May 2014 #174
A shirtless man? *gasp* quinnox May 2014 #11
The Victorian age ended in 1901 notadmblnd May 2014 #12
People need to get a life. Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #13
That is the most innocent, blah,blah, blah photo I've seen. Good lord..n/t monmouth3 May 2014 #14
I see nothing terribly wrong with the photos. .. pipoman May 2014 #15
I Have A Problem With the Pictures erpowers May 2014 #17
he is her brother's friend JI7 May 2014 #19
I Realize That erpowers May 2014 #22
friends usually don't worry about being so formal JI7 May 2014 #23
Except he's her brother's friend, not necessarily hers.. whathehell May 2014 #28
and siblings and their friends often end up hanging out JI7 May 2014 #31
and just as often they don't, especially if they're of different genders whathehell May 2014 #40
in this case it looks like they do JI7 May 2014 #46
In this case what it "looks like" is open to interpretation.. whathehell May 2014 #199
Why would a 20 year old be "best friends" with a 15 year old "for many years"? former9thward May 2014 #152
I agree...The sexualization of children (yes, 13 is a child) is an ongoing pursuit whathehell May 2014 #30
yeah, but in this case there is nothing sexual JI7 May 2014 #47
Not blatantly, no, but I assume you're familiar with the word "suggestive". whathehell May 2014 #200
And YOU are doing the "suggesting." Atman May 2014 #204
Oh Heavens!....Me and my dirty minded"suggesting" self, Lol! whathehell May 2014 #217
Its only suggestive if you send your mind straight to the gutter and start making baseless judgement phleshdef May 2014 #209
Gee -- Who would have thought so many DUers -- the Op, Intaglio, Starry Messenger, Bain's Bane whathehell May 2014 #214
Really strikes a nerve when you get called out for your pious, gutteral nonsense eh? phleshdef May 2014 #215
LOL..The "nerve" that's struck seems to be yours, honey. whathehell May 2014 #218
Yea, it does strike a nerve when people insinuate pedophilic behavior towards innocent people. phleshdef May 2014 #219
Aw, shucks, Aunt Righteous... Good luck on your Mission from God. whathehell May 2014 #221
I don't see anything terribly "sexual" about those pictures. Warren DeMontague May 2014 #18
they live in socal, for jeepers sakes hopemountain May 2014 #24
They look like they're watching TV. Others may be in the room.....who cares!!! Avalux May 2014 #26
At least one other person was definitely there, taking the pictures LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #35
In Europe they do worse than this LittleBlue May 2014 #29
"13 is a pretty ridiculous age to pose with a 20 year old dude.. whathehell May 2014 #45
There is nothing "sexual" about these pictures.... ForgoTheConsequence May 2014 #32
I agree. If these were family photos, they would just be family photos. enough May 2014 #37
Um, it's not just "the shirtless man".. whathehell May 2014 #41
Legs = sex. ForgoTheConsequence May 2014 #50
Oh, honey, give it up...We're all entitled to our opinions. whathehell May 2014 #197
So revealing redqueen May 2014 #34
I'm so sorry laundry_queen May 2014 #61
It shows nothing revealing...however, StarryNite May 2014 #36
Thank you....n/t whathehell May 2014 #42
Purity balls are about pledging your virginity to your father, as a girl... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #80
Isn't the real problem that peoples' minds instantly jump to pedophilia? chrisa May 2014 #38
+1 nomorenomore08 May 2014 #39
No, that isn't the real problem.. whathehell May 2014 #43
And without any context. Why do people always assume the worst? chrisa May 2014 #48
What if Will Smith, or his wife, took the stupid picture? MADem May 2014 #54
I'm not "assuming" anything...I'm giving my opinion of a photo.. whathehell May 2014 #194
The real problem is people projecting sex onto everything. ForgoTheConsequence May 2014 #55
What's your "obsession" with attacking people who disagee with you? whathehell May 2014 #193
Geez everyone so prudish, BIG DEAL! Its only flesh and skin. I don't see ANYTHING wrong with this. 951-Riverside May 2014 #44
Are you implying the man in the photo molested her? ForgoTheConsequence May 2014 #51
Whoa whoa whoa! Don't be a prude, whatever happened was clearly consensual 951-Riverside May 2014 #56
Well that's a ridiculous comparison... But ok. Agschmid May 2014 #181
I don't care what anyone says. Jenoch May 2014 #49
Why would it be acceptable then? Fearless May 2014 #72
Neither of them are wearing socks either!!!!1one!!! OMG! The horrors! penultimate May 2014 #52
I thought it looked like they were lounging around and watching television. MADem May 2014 #53
What I find a wee bit strange is a 15 yr old sees a 20 yr old as their best friend. KittyWampus May 2014 #189
Apparently, from what everyone who knows them is saying, MADem May 2014 #191
I smell a double standard. StarryNite May 2014 #57
because the purity balls are all about sex , it's all about girls substituting their father JI7 May 2014 #58
But StarryNite May 2014 #60
what is the "purity" in purity balls about ? the entire thing is about sex JI7 May 2014 #62
I don't know your gender... StarryNite May 2014 #63
they aren't laying as in sleeping together, they are lounging around, similar to if it was a couch JI7 May 2014 #69
The purity ball girls have sex with their fathers? bananas May 2014 #70
I'll give her this much: At 13 she is already a world-class expert in media manipulation.. Blue_Tires May 2014 #59
If she were my daughter I'd have none of it BainsBane May 2014 #64
Those who see nothing wrong are probably perfectly content intaglio May 2014 #65
I agree! StarryNite May 2014 #66
Uhm, if they aren't jealous rageaholics who don't trust their spouse, why would... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #78
Ad hom attack on the Starry Nite intaglio May 2014 #85
YOU are a piece of work! polly7 May 2014 #167
Is this performance art? Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #224
If I was married I wouldn't mind if my husband sat in bed with a male (or female) friend. Fearless May 2014 #81
If you were married would you be happy for your half naked husband intaglio May 2014 #84
In some places it is very warm. Fearless May 2014 #170
Or not. Hissyspit May 2014 #68
What exactly here encourages pedophilia? Fearless May 2014 #73
A 13 year old gir gets into bed with a 20 year old man intaglio May 2014 #74
Sitting on a bed does not equal sexual assualt. Fearless May 2014 #75
A greater RISK - read what was written intaglio May 2014 #82
You're creating a situation that isn't real Fearless May 2014 #172
You are behaving as if he is a sexual predator and a total stranger, what the fuck? Humanist_Activist May 2014 #77
No, read what is written intaglio May 2014 #83
That's an argument to make sure girls aren't allowed near any men until they reach... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #88
No, you wouldn't see how such a public example increases risk intaglio May 2014 #91
She wasn't in bed, they were on a bed maddezmom May 2014 #92
So you too think that sexual assault can only occur under the blankets intaglio May 2014 #96
sexual assault could happen if they are sitting on different chairs JI7 May 2014 #97
True but it is a a lot easier to commit the assault intaglio May 2014 #102
As a victim of sexual assault I know that it can occur anywhere maddezmom May 2014 #100
I have not said it encourages pedophile activity intaglio May 2014 #141
You did say it maddezmom May 2014 #144
I agree "enable" peodphile activity would have been better n/t intaglio May 2014 #149
Actually, that is worse but I can see it actually is how you feel maddezmom May 2014 #150
No it is disturbing that a photo shoot can normalise risky behaviour for 13yo n/t intaglio May 2014 #154
Yup. Agschmid May 2014 #164
What a load of bullshit maddezmom May 2014 #86
Any reasons or are you just making unsupported assertions? intaglio May 2014 #87
That's rich coming from someone who accuses anyone who doesn't agree with them... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #89
No I reported, entirely accurately, intaglio May 2014 #93
No, why would it be? I'm not attracted to 13 year old girls. Humanist_Activist May 2014 #95
Then why were you asserting that your experience with your acquaintances intaglio May 2014 #98
You are the one who slandered me, saying I was a risk to 13 year old girls... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #99
No, you admitted to a particular behaviour with, presumably, consenting adults intaglio May 2014 #112
Again, what justification, or lie would you have to tell CPS? Humanist_Activist May 2014 #114
You have abandoned reading for comprehension again intaglio May 2014 #125
And CPS would tell you to go away and stop filing false claims. n/t Humanist_Activist May 2014 #126
Yes, because it is a hypothetical case intaglio May 2014 #133
At risk for what? Leaning on a friend is not a crime or even taboo. giftedgirl77 May 2014 #135
A 13yo being alone, on a bed with a part clothed adult increases the risk of abuse intaglio May 2014 #143
Don't you think it depends on the people involved in the pic? maddezmom May 2014 #147
So you are claiming that I implied it intaglio May 2014 #155
Your caveats came after your initial post. maddezmom May 2014 #156
Oh bullshit. My son never wears a shirt around the house. giftedgirl77 May 2014 #159
They were ALONE? So who took the picture? Atman May 2014 #201
Oh Please -- It's not a question of "being alone" sans a photographer whathehell May 2014 #202
So we disagree. Atman May 2014 #203
Yeah, but the only people here I see "bent out of shape" are whathehell May 2014 #220
They obviously aren't alone. Pictures don't take themselves. Get your mind out of the gutter. phleshdef May 2014 #211
LOL! maddezmom May 2014 #90
Which unsupported assertions intaglio May 2014 #94
How about you saying I pose a risk to 13 year old girls, or are you going to delete that? Humanist_Activist May 2014 #101
No I said that if you commited the particular behaviour outlined you would be a risk intaglio May 2014 #104
I like how you use the term "half-naked", to make things seem more risky... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #105
I liked how he emphasized "alone" LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #108
The picture emphasized the isolation intaglio May 2014 #120
A fantasy YOU are projecting, what does that say about you? n/t Humanist_Activist May 2014 #124
Nice ad hom, but back to reality intaglio May 2014 #131
Exactly maddezmom May 2014 #140
It was neither fantasy nor photo shoot LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #129
Let me tell you about a girl who hung out with her brother and her brother's friend intaglio May 2014 #132
And Willow has made such an accusation? LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #134
No and I did not say she did - do not try to put word in my mouth. intaglio May 2014 #148
and there have been fathers who rape their daughter, so we should never allow any father to JI7 May 2014 #184
I've hung out in similar situations with friend's siblings and even my wifes younger sister. phleshdef May 2014 #212
No it is an accurate descriptive intaglio May 2014 #109
I did as a teenager, quite a bit, my sister's friends damn near lived at our parent's house... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #113
So did you lie on your bed with these children? Were they unsupervised intaglio May 2014 #123
Why the fuck do I have to fucking prove that I'm harmless? Seriously, just stop digging yourself... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #127
I am not saying you are an abuser FFS intaglio May 2014 #142
The implication was clear to me. maddezmom May 2014 #145
No, I did not state it outright indeed I did not even imply it intaglio May 2014 #153
You have no clue whether they were supervised or not & not giftedgirl77 May 2014 #137
The disgusting accusation against Human_Activist maddezmom May 2014 #103
No, he owned to a particular behaviour intaglio May 2014 #106
What justification could you possibly have to report me to CPS, seriously, that is just disgusting. Humanist_Activist May 2014 #110
I did not say I did have justification, please read for comprehension intaglio May 2014 #115
Uhm, what behaviors in the photo shoot are unacceptable? n/t Humanist_Activist May 2014 #116
The behaviours portrayed in the photoshoot are risky intaglio May 2014 #146
Last month, my niece slept on my bare chest... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #107
Glad you didn't post a pic here maddezmom May 2014 #111
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #117
OMG are you serious? maddezmom May 2014 #118
I wonder how horrified he would be that I changed her diaper too! n/t Humanist_Activist May 2014 #122
It was a serious question intaglio May 2014 #136
An uncle babysitting his niece and nephew needs supervision? maddezmom May 2014 #139
Seriously jberryhill May 2014 #160
Sometimes...Or haven't you heard of kids molested by relatives? whathehell May 2014 #222
Sorry, I don't live in his or your world maddezmom May 2014 #225
No, you live in a world of Denial.. whathehell May 2014 #226
If you can count my 3 year old nephew running around like his head was chopped off... Humanist_Activist May 2014 #119
Exactly how many times are you going to baselessly call him a child molester? LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #130
I did not, your claim about that is a lie intaglio May 2014 #151
*snort* You do realize we can see the rest of your posts, right? LadyHawkAZ May 2014 #165
It went 4-3 so it was pretty close, but I think it was a good hide the assertion was ludicrous. Agschmid May 2014 #182
Thats just god damn ridiculous. phleshdef May 2014 #210
Yawn. Hissyspit May 2014 #67
Exactly marions ghost May 2014 #168
If it was a brother or other male relative no one would have a problem Fearless May 2014 #71
You hit the nail on the head. GoCubsGo May 2014 #185
Well, boys will be boys, you know Warpy May 2014 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author Fearless May 2014 #79
I run around shirtless (and shoeless) all the time Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #121
Fine for adults to run around naked StarryNite May 2014 #169
I take it you don't know any naturists. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #171
You are completely missing the point. StarryNite May 2014 #173
Yeah, I tend to believe Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #180
Maybe a little weird, but I don't see anything sexual about those photos. RedCappedBandit May 2014 #128
I agree n/t bobGandolf May 2014 #138
Parents should be vigilant ecstatic May 2014 #157
some people just have too much free time on their hands Niceguy1 May 2014 #158
What amazes me is LibertyLover May 2014 #161
Looking at the photos, it appears that she is asleep in both. MineralMan May 2014 #162
I see the corporate news cycle is at the bottom of the barrel. Rex May 2014 #163
Wow, the responses here are amazing from a progressive, liberal website.... cbdo2007 May 2014 #166
Progressive doesn't mean naive. StarryNite May 2014 #183
So that means he's going to rape her? You're not making sense. chrisa May 2014 #187
So, in your mind, this photo taken completely out of context, implies... cbdo2007 May 2014 #190
There is nothing wrong with that. phleshdef May 2014 #208
Evil unto him who thinks evil of it. nt. My Good Babushka May 2014 #178
He doesn't appear to have much on in the way of pants, either... TeeYiYi May 2014 #186
If you have time or energy... sendero May 2014 #188
You're here posting... StarryNite May 2014 #195
I'm here posting because.. sendero May 2014 #198
I don't get what's wrong with the photos herding cats May 2014 #205
People who jumped to sexual conclusions about the photo have SICK minds. phleshdef May 2014 #207
I agree 100% Rex May 2014 #213
Pretty Baby? Taxi Driver? Lolita? Art is not life. McCamy Taylor May 2014 #216
You don't take chances with the safety of your own children Harmony Blue May 2014 #223

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
196. Better keep those 13-year-olds away from public swimming pools!
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:40 PM
May 2014

Lots of shirtless men hanging around there!

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
2. I like the last bits from the article. I don't see the problem.
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:01 PM
May 2014
He's shirtless and sitting up, she's reclining and resting her head on his knee. She's fully clothed. No parts of either of their torsos or pelvic regions are touching each other. She's not even facing his nipples! They're not under the covers! They're on. A. Made. Bed. Sometimes people sit on beds.

Further, we don't know what relationship these photos convey. Arias is a friend of Willow's brother; maybe she's known him for years and sees him like a platonic nonthreating male relative. And 13-year-old girls and 20-year-old nonrelated males are allowed to make nonsexual physical contact.
 

big_dog

(4,144 posts)
25. Will and Jada Pinkett Smith have 'no issues' with their daughter Willow, 13, lying in bed with Mois
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:55 PM
May 2014

Eyebrows were raised when a photo of Willow Smith lying in bed with actor Moises Arias was noticed on one of Kylie Jenner's Tumblr accounts on Tuesday.
But the singer's parents - actors Will and Jada Pinkett Smith - have no problem with their 13-year-old daughter posing that way with the 20-year-old actor, according to a Wednesday report from TMZ.
A source said the Smiths, who are both in their 40s, think Willow is 'old enough to make decisions on who she hangs with, even innocently in bed.'
Sources close to the married couple said they think their daughter is 'very mature' and think she has not 'crossed the line.' The black-and-white shots are an 'expression of art,' they beleive.
Moises is not a new face in the Smith family. The Hannah Montana star has been best friends with Will and Jada's 15-year-old Jaden for 'many years.




Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2622711/Will-Jada-Smith-no-issues-daughter-Willow-13-lying-bed-Moises-Arias-20-hes-family-friend.html#ixzz314MTy2Yd

Response to uppityperson (Reply #2)

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
177. Aw dang, missed the sociopath again. Maybe she should start an insect collection?
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:02 PM
May 2014

that is a good hobby and involves pins which might appeal to her not so nice nature?

Squinch

(50,901 posts)
3. I didn't see anything wrong with those photos. They look very platonic. It doesn't indicate
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:03 PM
May 2014

anything sexual to me.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
7. those pics could be from any group of family or friends that are just hanging out
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:08 PM
May 2014

i thought the pics were going to be something like the purity ball creep pics.

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
9. People need to get a life
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:10 PM
May 2014
shirtless man....scary. Thank god she didn't post pics at the pool or beach.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
10. Would people be upset if the photo was of her and a woman?
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:15 PM
May 2014

Maybe she isn't straight, maybe he isn't, etc.

Now if he had been holding open a door for her we could assume he was straight and was doing so because he wanted sex with her. But in this case they are just laying on a bed.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
33. Exacatly right. Well stated.
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:28 PM
May 2014

I don't see the big deal with the photo. It tells no story at all but leaves that up to the viewer.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
15. I see nothing terribly wrong with the photos. ..
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:33 PM
May 2014

If it comes to light later that she was victimized by this guy, her guardians should have culpability in the crime, imho. Until then I would yield to their judgment until it is demonstrated to be bad.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
17. I Have A Problem With the Pictures
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:40 PM
May 2014

I realize some people on DU will disagree with me, but I have a problem with a 20 year old man taking shirtless pictures with a 13 year old girl. He is a grown man and she is a child. If he is just a friend, he can put his shirt on and sit in a chair. I do not think it is Victorian Era thinking to think a 20 year old man should not be sitting shirtless on a bed with a 13 year old girl.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
22. I Realize That
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:45 PM
May 2014

I realize he is a friend of her brother. That is why I said he could put on a shirt and sit on the chair.

former9thward

(31,925 posts)
152. Why would a 20 year old be "best friends" with a 15 year old "for many years"?
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:11 AM
May 2014

At those ages the age gap is enormous.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
204. And YOU are doing the "suggesting."
Fri May 9, 2014, 02:33 PM
May 2014

Trying to make everyone else think there is something terrible going on with two friends hanging out.

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
217. Oh Heavens!....Me and my dirty minded"suggesting" self, Lol!
Fri May 9, 2014, 11:52 PM
May 2014

Judging by the OP and others on the thread, it seems I have a lot of company.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
209. Its only suggestive if you send your mind straight to the gutter and start making baseless judgement
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:18 PM
May 2014

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
214. Gee -- Who would have thought so many DUers -- the Op, Intaglio, Starry Messenger, Bain's Bane
Fri May 9, 2014, 11:40 PM
May 2014

me, and those on the internet referenced by the OP "sebd their minds to the gutter"...

Get your panties out of a knot -- This is just a mild difference of opinion (No one has called the photo 'obscene'

or pornographic) and it does NOT merit the nasty, personal attacks you and and many other

"defenders" of the photo are hurling at those of us who don't see things your way -- Talk about "baseless judgememt"


You all need to grow up and learn to tolerate disagreement with some modicum of civility.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
18. I don't see anything terribly "sexual" about those pictures.
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:41 PM
May 2014

More like a hot Manhattan afternoon in a loft with no window AC unit.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
24. they live in socal, for jeepers sakes
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:52 PM
May 2014

a lot of young men on the coast run around shirtless wearing jams and flipflops. and 13 year old girls often hangout with their bros and their friends they have grown up with.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
26. They look like they're watching TV. Others may be in the room.....who cares!!!
Wed May 7, 2014, 05:58 PM
May 2014

Why don't people get outraged over things worth getting outraged about?

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
35. At least one other person was definitely there, taking the pictures
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:36 PM
May 2014

Probably her brother.

But ehrmagerd, they're on a bed, and other people have sex on beds, therefore they are having sex on the bed. Or something.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
29. In Europe they do worse than this
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:03 PM
May 2014

Models under 18 pose nude. There was a small uproar about it in an English fashion blog I follow.

13 is pretty ridiculous to pose with a 20-year-old dude. I'm surprised Will and Jada allowed it. On the other hand, if she intends to pursue modeling, 13 is a good age to start.

They're both clothed, so it's a meh from me.

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
45. "13 is a pretty ridiculous age to pose with a 20 year old dude..
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:38 PM
May 2014

I'm surprised Will and Jada allowed it".

Yes.

"On the other hand, if she intends to pursue modeling, 13 is a good age to start"

There's really no "other hand" -- She could pursue modeling in an entirely different,

age-appropriate context...You got right the first time.

enough

(13,254 posts)
37. I agree. If these were family photos, they would just be family photos.
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:24 PM
May 2014

Which apparently is what they are.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,867 posts)
50. Legs = sex.
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:29 AM
May 2014

I must have forgotten. It's possible to touch someones leg without getting aroused you know.....The only thing "sexual" about this photo is what you're projecting on it.

redqueen

(115,101 posts)
34. So revealing
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:35 PM
May 2014
much of the backlash has focused on Willow's behavior or her parents' failure to control her rather than the adult man photographed alongside her.

The shots aren't new to the net; Arias (who some may know from a recurring role in Hannah Montana)posted them to his Tumblr last month without so much as a peeplike utterance from the web. It wasn't until yesterday, when Willow posted the photos to her Instagram account, that people started going really fucking nuts.


Over a pic that shows nothing sexual.

What a sad spectacle.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
61. I'm so sorry
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:11 AM
May 2014

but I haw haw'ed right out loud when I read the comments:

Who the hell reads Moises Arias' Tumbler?

response: ikr

For those who don't know he played one of THE most irritating characters on Hannah Montana (probably the most irritating I've seen on kid's television). I have 4 daughters so I'm well versed in Hannah Montana.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
36. It shows nothing revealing...however,
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:41 PM
May 2014

when my daughter was 13 I sure wouldn't let her lay in a bed with a man or even a boy her own age. Maybe this was just a photo shoot but it still doesn't seem right. And no, it's not the same thing as people on a beach.

How many people find these pictures okay but are opposed to the Purity Balls? I think they are both wrong.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
80. Purity balls are about pledging your virginity to your father, as a girl...
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:27 AM
May 2014

I find that both sexist(why aren't boys pledging their virginity to their mothers?), and just...strange. Its a new, religious/cultural phenomenon that seems creepy because of two things, the pledging of virginity seems far too sexual, and two, it portrays domineering parenting as a good thing.

I don't see how that is in any way comparable to an innocent photo, you are removing the context from the photo, inserting your own sexual issues onto it, and then claiming its wrong because of that. The Purity Balls provide their own, explicit and creepy context.

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
38. Isn't the real problem that peoples' minds instantly jump to pedophilia?
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:34 PM
May 2014

It's not like there's anything remotely provocative about the picture. Very strange...

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
43. No, that isn't the real problem..
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:29 PM
May 2014

The real problem is a 13 year old lying on a bed with a shirtless 20 year old man.

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
48. And without any context. Why do people always assume the worst?
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:41 PM
May 2014

What if Will Smith were standing right there? Wouldn't that drastically change the context of the picture?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
54. What if Will Smith, or his wife, took the stupid picture?
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:45 AM
May 2014

If that's "sexy" I think some people have a very pathetic idea of what constitutes "sexy." They look like they're watching cartoons.

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
194. I'm not "assuming" anything...I'm giving my opinion of a photo..
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:34 PM
May 2014

If Will were standing there it might change the context.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,867 posts)
55. The real problem is people projecting sex onto everything.
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:48 AM
May 2014

What's your obsession with making non-sexual situations sexual?

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
44. Geez everyone so prudish, BIG DEAL! Its only flesh and skin. I don't see ANYTHING wrong with this.
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:31 PM
May 2014

Michael Jackson, Woody Allen and Roman Polanski all did it. BIG WHOOP!

Get off your high horses.

Shes more than capable of handling herself.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,867 posts)
51. Are you implying the man in the photo molested her?
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:30 AM
May 2014

That's a pretty serious allegation. Maybe we should ask the girl herself if she was victimized? She seems to think not.

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
56. Whoa whoa whoa! Don't be a prude, whatever happened was clearly consensual
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:58 AM
May 2014

What a shirtless 20 year old man does behind closed doors with a 13 year old girl on a bed is NONE of our business. Geez get off your high horses people, like Michael Jackson once said:

"Why can't you share your bed? The most loving thing to do is to share your bed with someone. "




 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
49. I don't care what anyone says.
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:58 PM
May 2014

A 13 year old girl and a 20 year old man should not be 'lounging' together on a bed for any reason. The nly way that woukd be acceptable is if they were siblings.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
53. I thought it looked like they were lounging around and watching television.
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:38 AM
May 2014

Not like she was "posing on a bed with a shirtless man."

Someone with a camera was clearly in the room. She doesn't look "seductive" -- she looks tired, and he looks comfortable, not "lustful."

The 20 year old is apparently best friends with her fifteen year old brother.



I think there are a lot of things that are worth worrying about, but I think a bunch of Hollywood kids who don't--for a change--look like they're doing anything wrong (Miss Willow is entirely dressed) isn't very high on my list.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
189. What I find a wee bit strange is a 15 yr old sees a 20 yr old as their best friend.
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:26 PM
May 2014

Totally different peer groups.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
191. Apparently, from what everyone who knows them is saying,
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:33 PM
May 2014

they are in the same "biz," the older one is young for his age and the younger one is old for his age, and they have known each other personally and professionally for many years now.

Apparently the twenty year old had a role in the Hannah Montana program.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
57. I smell a double standard.
Thu May 8, 2014, 01:30 AM
May 2014

As I recall the girls who were dancing with their fathers at the Purity Ball were fully clothed too, yet most of us found it very creepy. There were obviously other people at the ball taking pictures but we still felt something was wrong with it. We didn't see anything in particular going on but we had that feeling it was wrong. But a 20 year old man laying in a bed with a 13 year old girl seems perfectly okay? Would you all be okay if your 13 year old daughter was laying in bed with a man?

JI7

(89,239 posts)
58. because the purity balls are all about sex , it's all about girls substituting their father
Thu May 8, 2014, 01:52 AM
May 2014

until they find a husband and to commit to not have sex with anyone else.

the whole thing is just creepy. the pics were creepy because we knew what the subject matter was.

in the pic of of this op we see 2 people on the same bed and we know the guy is a friend of the girl's brother . so we just see it as people who are hanging out unless there is anything we don't know. it's all normal .

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
60. But
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:05 AM
May 2014

we are making a leap in our thinking if we feel the girls are substituting their fathers for sex. We don't like the way the fathers look at their daughters in the still shots we've seen. We don't like that the girls consider their fathers to be their boyfriends or husbands or whatever the heck they're considered to be. The girls don't appear to be pressured into it. They look happy but we feel it's creepy. However, we have no proof that anything abusive is going on. Those are their fathers and yet we worry for those minor aged girls.

Now we have this minor aged girl laying in a bed with a man. Does it really matter that he's the friend of her brother? Most girls that are sexually abused are abused by somebody they know. Somebody they might start out trusting.

I don't know, both scenarios seem twisted and wrong to me. I wouldn't have allowed my 13 year old daughter to lay in bed with a man. And I would have asked my adult son what the hell he was thinking if I had seen him laying in a bed with a 13 year old girl.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
62. what is the "purity" in purity balls about ? the entire thing is about sex
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:11 AM
May 2014

it's just fucking creepy. it's what we know. i'm not claiming the fathers are molesting the daughters or anything like that. but the whole thing is fucking creepy regardless.

in the op pics i have been in many situations where a similar snapshot could have been taken . i remember many times hanging out with some people on the bed or lying around somewhere else.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
63. I don't know your gender...
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:22 AM
May 2014

but if you're male, after you became a man, did you lay in bed with 13 year old girls? Remember, this guy is 20, he's not a kid.

And yes, those purity balls are creepy to me too!

JI7

(89,239 posts)
69. they aren't laying as in sleeping together, they are lounging around, similar to if it was a couch
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:11 AM
May 2014

and there were times usually when it was some family get together and you would have a bunch hanging out in some bedroom including on the bed .

bananas

(27,509 posts)
70. The purity ball girls have sex with their fathers?
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:15 AM
May 2014

You wrote:

because the purity balls are all about sex , it's all about girls substituting their father

until they find a husband and to commit to not have sex with anyone else.


Sounds like you're saying the girls have sex with their fathers.

I didn't read the purity ball threads, is that what DUers were actually saying?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
59. I'll give her this much: At 13 she is already a world-class expert in media manipulation..
Thu May 8, 2014, 01:59 AM
May 2014

Hollywood reporters are going to have a heart attack trying to chase her around town...

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
65. Those who see nothing wrong are probably perfectly content
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:30 AM
May 2014

With photos that encourage pedophile activity in adults. It also teaches 13 year olds it is OK to act in a sexually risky manner with adults.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
66. I agree!
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:35 AM
May 2014

And I have to wonder how many of those people would think it was okay for their spouse to lay in bed with an adult of the opposite sex, after all, they're just chillin' right? LOL

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
78. Uhm, if they aren't jealous rageaholics who don't trust their spouse, why would...
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:11 AM
May 2014

they have a problem with that? After all, its not like they are having sex or behaving unfaithfully.

If you have issues with such innocent activities, then there must be some serious trust issues in your relationship.

Of course, bear in mind that in our apartment, our couch in the living room is a futon that is decidedly uncomfortable, and if either me or my SO have anyone over, and we are watching a movie together, it will most likely be in one of the bedrooms, the "mancave" has a twin bed(and HDTV), also doubles as my office, or the master bedroom. Neither room has chairs in them, nor room for them, unless you take out the beds.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
85. Ad hom attack on the Starry Nite
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:56 AM
May 2014

General MRA style misogynistic characterisation of (female) spouses.

Insistence that it is OK for others to allow children to engage in risky behaviours

Insistence that such activities are "innocent" and carry no risk

And lastly, you are implying that you would lie on your bed with a 13yo girl - is there any way I can inform CPS about the potential risk you pose to girls?

You are a piece of work!

polly7

(20,582 posts)
167. YOU are a piece of work!
Thu May 8, 2014, 11:56 AM
May 2014

How you can twist the words and intent of others to reflect your own distorted views and then use them to stoke outrage - is sick.

You should stop.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
81. If I was married I wouldn't mind if my husband sat in bed with a male (or female) friend.
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:28 AM
May 2014

People sit at the same distance on the couch all the time.

Besides, back in college a group of friends would all sit basically shoulder to shoulder in the dorm room watching tv/video games/movies and whatnot until we'd pass out in the wee hours of the morning. I'm sure there was even a time or two a leg brushed another leg! But it's not sexual. And my boyfriend at the time never touched another guy in a sexual manner or he wouldn't be my boyfriend (and vice versa).

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
84. If you were married would you be happy for your half naked husband
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:47 AM
May 2014

to be on a bed with a 13yo girl? If so please be prepared to receive many proposals of marriage from sexual predators who would love to marry with an enabler of abuse.

BTW when you were in college, were you 13 years old? Did you have many 13yo passed out on these beds?

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
170. In some places it is very warm.
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:48 PM
May 2014

For instance, I spent a short period of time in Hawaii. I don't think I wore a shirt for ten minutes during that time if I didn't have to. It is socially acceptable there to walk around "half naked". It's not sexual. It's comfortable.

If I was married, I don't think I would need to order my husband to not sit near younger female friends without a shirt on. Primarily because my husband would not be a pedophile. But also because he would be gay. And secondarily, I don't see people getting bent out of shape if it was a 13 year old boy and a 20 year old friend either. Why? Because it is assumed that in a heteronormative society that they will not engage in sexual activities. The same is true of mixed gender groups, but there is an irrational fear that for some reason Joe Sixpack will just out of the blue want to rape a girl. That's a silly and irrational fear. If you know the young man and trust him, and have no reason not to think he might rape someone, then it really isn't a big deal at all. Very few guys find 13 year old girls attractive, and it takes a very sick person to try something.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
73. What exactly here encourages pedophilia?
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:42 AM
May 2014

And what was she doing that was sexually risky?

Would this help?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
74. A 13 year old gir gets into bed with a 20 year old man
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:57 AM
May 2014

and you are saying that there is no risk to the girl of being sexually assaulted - or are you an idiot who believes a 13yo can give informed consent to sexual activity.

As a hobby do you make jokes about battered women, rape, murder and holocaust?

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
75. Sitting on a bed does not equal sexual assualt.
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:03 AM
May 2014

Men are not sex starved proto-humans, incapable of non-sexual relationships with members of the opposite sex. Had it been a 20 year old women, no one would have cared.

And at what point does this photo suggest that she was battered, raped, murdered, or in any way affiliated with the holocaust? I'd sure like to know.

And for the record... they got ONTO bed not INTO bed. There is a difference.

Clearly the parents know this young man, and feel it is a safe environment for their daughter. I am fine with that.

And again I ask what this photo has to do with pedophilia?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
82. A greater RISK - read what was written
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:39 AM
May 2014

You would be happy for a 13yo to go to a neighbours house and play happy families with a half naked guy on a bed. For the record not IN the bed - ON the bed. Or does sexual assault only occur when people get under blankets, presumable so God doesn't see?

Next let's dispose of your nonsense that this concerns only Willow Smith, it doesn't: it concerns girls and their families who do not perceive the risk of such behaviour and who will add this photo shoot to the cultural background that friends are safe.

You also seem to have the stupid idea that if the family know the young man with whom their 13yo daughter is friends she will be safe: you are aware that the vast majority of child sexual assaults are committed by family and friends?

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
172. You're creating a situation that isn't real
Thu May 8, 2014, 01:01 PM
May 2014

1. They had known each other personally for several years

2. In that time, he had never done anything to her of a sexual nature

3. Her parents have full confidence in nothing happening, people who heretofore have never shown signs of neglect toward their children

4. There was at least one other person in the room

5. They were art photos not a real scene caught in photo. They were planned images

6. Nothing of a sexual nature is happening in the photo

7. Having a shirt off does not imply sexual activity.

8. They weren't in bed. They were sitting on a bed.

9. The existence of a bed does not imply sexual activity.

10. He has never been accused of being a pedophile.

11. She has never shown signs of sexual abuse and seems genuinely comfortable around him.

I could go on, but I've given this as much time as I'm willing. The fact is two people can pose for photos without being sexual active with each other. You see what you want to see.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
77. You are behaving as if he is a sexual predator and a total stranger, what the fuck?
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:05 AM
May 2014

Do you have anything reasonable to contribute to this discussion, or just wild accusations and conclusions?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
83. No, read what is written
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:43 AM
May 2014

The family have allowed their daughter to demonstrate to other 13yo girls and older men that it is acceptable for young girls to play games on a bed with an older man.

Also, as observed above, the vast majority of child sexual assaults are committed by family and friends.

This photo shoot increases risk

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
88. That's an argument to make sure girls aren't allowed near any men until they reach...
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:16 AM
May 2014

age of majority. At least not unsupervised.

I don't see how the photo shoot increases risk.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
91. No, you wouldn't see how such a public example increases risk
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:26 AM
May 2014

Any more than you would see how the publicity of groupie culture harmed and enabled the sexual assault of many children. Indeed I am sure you are happy to give Jimmy Savile, Paul Gadd, Iggy Pop et al the benefit of the doubt because, mostly all they were doing was being photographed and lying on couches aor beds with under-age girls, indeed they were hardly guilty of Child Sexual Abuse at all.

But as long as you keep your private fantasies festering inside your skull I see no problem at all.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
96. So you too think that sexual assault can only occur under the blankets
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:38 AM
May 2014

The picture may not be sexual to you (but beware there are a lot of wierdos out there) however the point is not the sexuality within the image. The point is the visible example it sets to underage children, their parents and the friends who would like to pose in the same way.

It increases risk by normalising a particularly behaviour which can then be exploited by an abuser.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
97. sexual assault could happen if they are sitting on different chairs
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:45 AM
May 2014

sexual assault could happen if someone is walking alone somewhere .

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
102. True but it is a a lot easier to commit the assault
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:51 AM
May 2014

if the child is lying on the abuser's bed, the abuser is partly unclothed, and both the child and the child's parents view that situation as risk free.

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
100. As a victim of sexual assault I know that it can occur anywhere
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:49 AM
May 2014

But I do not believe this picture harms anyone and to assert because i don't see it the same way as you.....that according to you:
perfectly content with photos that encourage pedophile activity in adults....is absurd.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
141. I have not said it encourages pedophile activity
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:42 AM
May 2014

I have said that it makes situations that allow pedophile activity seem more normal and hence the report of the abused both less believable and less likely.

As you are an abuse survivor the following bits of imagined dialogue may require a trigger warning. Sorry I hate trying to get into the mind of abusers
.
.
.
.
.
.
"It's OK, babe, guys cuddle girls all the time - you know, like Willow and her friend, - and you thought those photo's were cool,"
"Oh, we were only cuddling - like Willow and her brother's friend - sorry if your daughter thought it was wrong,"
"We were having a tickle game - and she asked me to take off my shirt like Willow's friend - I didn't see anything wrong,"
"She's up in my room asleep - I think she had a nightmare though, don't worry I'll be there when she wakes up."

/Shud-d-d-d-er

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
150. Actually, that is worse but I can see it actually is how you feel
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:05 AM
May 2014

And it is disturbing that you would go there because of a difference of opinion over a photo.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
87. Any reasons or are you just making unsupported assertions?
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:11 AM
May 2014

Bullshit may stink but it is more useful than your post because it encourages flowers to grow

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
89. That's rich coming from someone who accuses anyone who doesn't agree with them...
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:20 AM
May 2014

to being a pedophile.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
93. No I reported, entirely accurately,
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:31 AM
May 2014

That you were happy to lie in your bed in your apartment with, guests, and asserted that if you thought that such if behaviour with a 13yo girl was acceptable I would want to inform CPS about the risk you posed.

Are you now saying that you view lying on your bed in your apartment with a 13yo girl as acceptable and not in the least risky?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
98. Then why were you asserting that your experience with your acquaintances
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:46 AM
May 2014

has any bearing on this thread at all? This thread is about how these photographs teach 13yo children (and the parents of such children) that lying on a bed with a much older, half naked man is an acceptable behaviour.

I say this photo shoot is, at the very least, irresponsible.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
99. You are the one who slandered me, saying I was a risk to 13 year old girls...
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:48 AM
May 2014

ON EDIT: Frankly, I think this is called projection.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
112. No, you admitted to a particular behaviour with, presumably, consenting adults
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:08 AM
May 2014

I pointed out that this thread concerned a 13yo girl and that if you performed those same behaviours with a 13yo I would want to report you to CPS.

That is not slander just a statement of fact.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
114. Again, what justification, or lie would you have to tell CPS?
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:13 AM
May 2014

And I will say that we did have a Super Smash Bros. Melee tournament in the room I'm talking about, that means that I, my fiancee, and her two nieces, aged 14 and 16 were all on the bed, at the same time! OMG, report me, if you dare.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
125. You have abandoned reading for comprehension again
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:40 AM
May 2014

I stated that if (note the conditional "if&quot you performed those actions with a 13 year old I would have a right (and probably a duty) to so report you.

You have also quoted a hypothetical case as an invitation for me to report you.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
133. Yes, because it is a hypothetical case
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:08 AM
May 2014

But if you performed the actions I outlined then a child would be at risk.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
135. At risk for what? Leaning on a friend is not a crime or even taboo.
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:14 AM
May 2014

Hell she wasn't even leaning against the unclothed body part which was his torso. I can imagine the erhmigawd if she had been leaning against his bare arm.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
143. A 13yo being alone, on a bed with a part clothed adult increases the risk of abuse
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:47 AM
May 2014

Parents who think it is normal for such activity to take place are placing their children at risk.

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
147. Don't you think it depends on the people involved in the pic?
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:55 AM
May 2014

As for the rest of your comment about parents, I will just link to my other reply to you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4924290

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
159. Oh bullshit. My son never wears a shirt around the house.
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:15 AM
May 2014

Everything isn't a potential case of abuse. If you look at the pic he isn't even touching her (other than his knee).

Atman

(31,464 posts)
201. They were ALONE? So who took the picture?
Fri May 9, 2014, 09:09 AM
May 2014

Intaglio seems to be trying to create hysteria where none belongs. I couldn't believe the pictures when I first saw them. Like, THIS is what all the fuss is about? I grew up on the beach. We went to the grocery store, hell even went to school, wearing less clothing than this. Your own personal hang-ups about the human body don't make another person a pedophile.

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
202. Oh Please -- It's not a question of "being alone" sans a photographer
Fri May 9, 2014, 02:22 PM
May 2014

Pornography generally requires photographers too --- and no, I'm not saying this

picture amounts to porn..It's just a tad suggestive and something I wouldn't be comfortable

with my 13 year old daughter doing.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
203. So we disagree.
Fri May 9, 2014, 02:31 PM
May 2014

The girl is doing nothing but hanging with a friend. Would it make a difference if they were on the carpet in the living room in front of a TV? NOTHING is going on...they are both dressed...women are not even required to wear shirts in New York City, why does it bend you out of shape that a man is shirtless here?

Sherman, set the Wayback Machine to 1600!

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
220. Yeah, but the only people here I see "bent out of shape" are
Sat May 10, 2014, 12:04 AM
May 2014

you and the photo's other "defenders".

Project much?.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
101. How about you saying I pose a risk to 13 year old girls, or are you going to delete that?
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:49 AM
May 2014

You are one sick person.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
104. No I said that if you commited the particular behaviour outlined you would be a risk
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:54 AM
May 2014

I also noted that you seem to think it is acceptable for 13yo children to be alone on the bed of a half naked, older man.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
105. I like how you use the term "half-naked", to make things seem more risky...
Thu May 8, 2014, 05:58 AM
May 2014

He was shirtless, if he's like most guys, like me, I go shirtless all the time when I'm at home, hell I only wear pants when we have company over.

And, here's the key, the ones who get to judge if its acceptable or not would be the parents, the friend and the 13 year old girl. Again, you seem to be sexualizing something that wasn't sexualized by the participants.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
108. I liked how he emphasized "alone"
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:04 AM
May 2014

when the photographer, who was likely her brother since they are best friends, was also there.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
120. The picture emphasized the isolation
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:33 AM
May 2014

and it is the image that presents a 13yo lying on a bed with a much older man and that is the fantasy being presented, not the reality of a photo shoot. Do you picture all of the film crew present when watching scenes from Iron Man? Of course you do not.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
131. Nice ad hom, but back to reality
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:04 AM
May 2014

I have stated that 13yo girls apparently alone with 20yo men are not healthy images to project. To counter that you chose to highlight your behaviours with an adult. In response that I pointed out that acceptable behaviours with an adult are not necessarily acceptable with a 13yo girl.

To get round this you have resorted to special pleading.

Please note
[font size="4"]At no point have I said you are guilty of such actions, just that if such actions are committed they place a child at risk[/font]

Note: also I have not resorted to the ad hom that really, you are protesting your innocence far too much. I have avoided that because I do not believe it and it would distract from your unacceptable argument that children with older men are not at risk.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
129. It was neither fantasy nor photo shoot
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:51 AM
May 2014

It was a teenager hanging out with her brother and her brother's friend, apparently watching TV, which someone took a picture of. You are projecting something in your head into a situation where it didn't exist.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
132. Let me tell you about a girl who hung out with her brother and her brother's friend
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:05 AM
May 2014

Ok she was younger, 9, but the abuse continued until she was 15. No adult in the family believed her and, by report, the brother went on to abuse his own daughter (this first is anecdote but RIP, Kim)

What about the young girls in Rochdale who were used and prostituted by guys 20 - 30 years old? No-one believed them either.

What about that wonderful man, always working for charity, working with hospitals letting kids be photographed with him and assaulting kids for years because no-one believed those brave enough to talk because Jimmy Savile was such a kind man

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
148. No and I did not say she did - do not try to put word in my mouth.
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:56 AM
May 2014

I said it would make it easier for abusers to portray their behaviours as acceptable. Just as Kim's brother portrayed to her that sex for a 9yo was normal because her parents had left her in his charge, just as the Rochdale abusers could rely on the disbelief of Childrens Services, just as Jimmy Savile chose his victims because they could not complain.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
184. and there have been fathers who rape their daughter, so we should never allow any father to
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:44 PM
May 2014

be alone with his daughter. because it increases the risk of sexual abuse.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
212. I've hung out in similar situations with friend's siblings and even my wifes younger sister.
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:24 PM
May 2014

I double god damn dare you to suggest there was anything sexual in nature about it. Double god damn dare you.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
113. I did as a teenager, quite a bit, my sister's friends damn near lived at our parent's house...
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:10 AM
May 2014

growing up, her being 6 years younger, and me staying there even after starting college, I left my room without my shirt on many times. A couple of times, when I didn't know anyone else was there, I even, *gasp*, left my bedroom in only underwear. That lead to quite a bit of embarrassment.

So from when I was a kid till I was about 19-20 or so.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
123. So did you lie on your bed with these children? Were they unsupervised
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:37 AM
May 2014

Did you normalise unacceptable behaviours as acceptable? If you had had these younger persons alone in your room then you would need to have been reported to CPS because the greatest risk of abuse to children comes from family and friends.

BTW, you are now resorting to anecdotal evidence in an attempt to prove how harmless you are ...

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
127. Why the fuck do I have to fucking prove that I'm harmless? Seriously, just stop digging yourself...
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:45 AM
May 2014

deeper into this hole.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
142. I am not saying you are an abuser FFS
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:44 AM
May 2014

I am saying that if you indulged in behaviour that could lead to abuse you would need to be watched.

There is reality and then there is the hypothetical.

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
145. The implication was clear to me.
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:51 AM
May 2014

Okay, maybe you didn't state it outright but it is there. So is the implication about those of us that don't see the same as you do in the photo and it is offensive, not only as a rape survivor but as the mom of a 13 yr old girl.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
153. No, I did not state it outright indeed I did not even imply it
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:16 AM
May 2014

I gave a hypothetical where an adult acting in the same way with a 13yo as he does with another adult could be classed as abusive behaviour.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
137. You have no clue whether they were supervised or not & not
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:23 AM
May 2014

every relationship is sinister. Many people just grow up as homies & that's it. Many of us had friends that were like family to us & would do anything for our siblings as well & treat them as such.

They are FL kids we don't do much in the clothes dept ever, I can't get my son to wear a shirt to save his life. But I'll be sure to let him know about the implications it can lead to by not wearing one.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
106. No, he owned to a particular behaviour
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:03 AM
May 2014

ie only having a bed as a comfortable seat in his apartment and that guests often shared that bed with him, presumably in a non-sexual way.

I pointed out that he did not do that with 13yo girls but that if he did I would want to report him to CPS.

That is not an accusation, it is a statement of an action I would take if I believed Human_Activist did perform such abusive behaviours. This is an assertion of the type of actions I have taken in the past to protect the vulnerable.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
110. What justification could you possibly have to report me to CPS, seriously, that is just disgusting.
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:06 AM
May 2014

You enjoy falsely reporting people to authorities, do you get your rocks off that way?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
115. I did not say I did have justification, please read for comprehension
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:20 AM
May 2014
1) I said that you have owned to acting in a certain way with adult friends;

2) I have said that this thread does not concern the actions of adults but the actions of minors, specifically 13yo children;

3) I averred that if you acted with a 13yo in the same way as you do with adults I would want to report you to CPS.

If this last case pertained to reality I would have such justification but I am not saying this case is the actuality.


You have attempted to draw a parallel between your, presumably, innocent behaviours and the behaviours approved by this photo shoot, if you don't like me pointing out the foolishness of your parallel then don't make it

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
146. The behaviours portrayed in the photoshoot are risky
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:52 AM
May 2014

Note I said "portrayed" and "risky".

The concept that informed the idea of this photo shoot in itself is unacceptable because it seeks to portray risky behaviours as normal.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
107. Last month, my niece slept on my bare chest...
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:04 AM
May 2014

granted, she was 2 months old, I was babysitting, and she already did something that was very nasty to my shirt at the time.

The worst thing though was she has a grip like a titan, I don't have many chest hairs, and I had fewer after she was done with me. lol

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
111. Glad you didn't post a pic here
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:07 AM
May 2014

Or intaglio might have reported you to the authorities. some of the stuff in this thread has me SMH.

Response to Humanist_Activist (Reply #107)

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
136. It was a serious question
Thu May 8, 2014, 07:21 AM
May 2014

because it is a serious subject. There are too many cases of child abuse for this not to be serious. I am not accusing anyone of actual abuse but all responsible adults have to be aware of the possibility.

Pictures such as those mentioned in the OP normalise situations which make abuse more possible and hence make the abuse harder to detect.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
160. Seriously
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:34 AM
May 2014

I shudder to think what this person would have done upon catching me at the beach or the pool with my fiancee's daughters, carrying them around on my shirtless back and all!

whathehell

(29,026 posts)
222. Sometimes...Or haven't you heard of kids molested by relatives?
Sat May 10, 2014, 12:24 AM
May 2014

Sorry, but you already "live in his world".

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
119. If you can count my 3 year old nephew running around like his head was chopped off...
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:31 AM
May 2014

as me being "supervised" then no.

Why? Are you projecting again?

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
130. Exactly how many times are you going to baselessly call him a child molester?
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:56 AM
May 2014

Are you trying for another vacation? What on earth is your problem?

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
151. I did not, your claim about that is a lie
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:10 AM
May 2014

I said that if he acted with adolescents the way he acted with adult that (hypothetical) case would amount to child abuse

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
210. Thats just god damn ridiculous.
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:21 PM
May 2014

I've been in similar situations with younger sisters of my friends, all watching tv in my friends bedroom or something. I didn't have my shirt off but there was nothing sexual about it and I DARE you to act like there was.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
71. If it was a brother or other male relative no one would have a problem
Thu May 8, 2014, 03:30 AM
May 2014

But because it isn't, people are going crazy. The photos are not sexual. They aren't doing anything. They are happy. What a world we live in where people assume that the only thing on the guy's mind must be sex.

Warpy

(111,124 posts)
76. Well, boys will be boys, you know
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:05 AM
May 2014

and therefore utterly blameless when they go after barely pubescent little girls.

And for the terminally dense,

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
121. I run around shirtless (and shoeless) all the time
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:34 AM
May 2014

If 'the naughty bits' are covered, exactly what makes it sexual? Hell, even if he were fully nude, that pose wouldn't necessarily be sexual. If they were both fully nude it might not be sexual - they might both be naturists for all we know. Lots of people just don't like wearing clothes. I know a couple of people with fibromyalgia who spend a lot of time nude because there are 'fibro days' where wearing clothes just hurts too damn much.

Nudity != sex.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
169. Fine for adults to run around naked
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:11 PM
May 2014

with each other as long as they both agree to it. A whole different ballgame when one is an adult and the other is a 13 year old kid. Get real.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
171. I take it you don't know any naturists.
Thu May 8, 2014, 12:51 PM
May 2014

Entire families run around nude and interact with other nudists of both genders and all ages.

Me, I'm too insecure to go anywhere nude in public, my body is hideously unaesthetic.


Of course, in this instance, the kid was already fully clothed, and the guy was every bit as dressed as you often see guys run around. I would guess the Smiths have a giganto pool, so the male friends and family might run around topless a lot.

StarryNite

(9,434 posts)
173. You are completely missing the point.
Thu May 8, 2014, 01:45 PM
May 2014

But hey, if you'd be okay with your 13 year old daughter laying in/on bed with a man, I guess you just have a whole lot more trust than I do.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
180. Yeah, I tend to believe
Thu May 8, 2014, 02:19 PM
May 2014

that I would extend trust to long term friends of the family, no matter their age or gender, and not automatically assume they were sexual predators.

Not just any 'man' off the street, but somebody the family has known for quite a while, with no known history of perviness, that is.

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
128. Maybe a little weird, but I don't see anything sexual about those photos.
Thu May 8, 2014, 06:48 AM
May 2014

If the guy is a close family friend it's not exactly abnormal.

ecstatic

(32,641 posts)
157. Parents should be vigilant
Thu May 8, 2014, 08:22 AM
May 2014

Never get too relaxed. Of course the photo looks innocent. But that doesn't mean that inappropriate things aren't happening. At 13, I had grown men expose themselves to me and say inappropriate things. Men who my parents knew and possibly trusted. I never mentioned it to them, and luckily it never advanced to full blown assault, etc.

LibertyLover

(4,788 posts)
161. What amazes me is
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:45 AM
May 2014

that she's the daughter of 2 well known and well paid actors and all she has is a dinky twin bed in her bedroom. I am presuming of course that it is her bedroom that the photos were taken in. If it was in Moises' bedroom, then dude - at least spring for a full size bed - trust me, it's more comfortable for two. Unless of course you add a large, cuddly, wussy greyhound to the mix.

MineralMan

(146,248 posts)
162. Looking at the photos, it appears that she is asleep in both.
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:49 AM
May 2014

Boredom. I'm afraid I can't see anything ominous in either photo, which were probably taken by the kid's brother.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
163. I see the corporate news cycle is at the bottom of the barrel.
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:55 AM
May 2014

How incredibly petty of them, that they had to add that he was GASP...shirtless!

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
166. Wow, the responses here are amazing from a progressive, liberal website....
Thu May 8, 2014, 10:43 AM
May 2014

There is nothing in the picture that suggests anything sexual but people are so f***ed up in their own minds, they project all of their own fears/insecurities/fantasies on other people and freak out over nothing.

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
187. So that means he's going to rape her? You're not making sense.
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:10 PM
May 2014

Did you have any older brothers? Did his friends ever hang around with you?

Why are people saying that he's a instantly a rapist because there's a young girl laying next to him? That's such a reach of an assumption that I don't even know where to start.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
190. So, in your mind, this photo taken completely out of context, implies...
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:27 PM
May 2014

that she is a sex object and he is a rapist. Great.

Would it be more appropriate if she was wearing a burka so he didn't get those urges?? lol.

Sometimes this place (DU) drives me crazy.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
208. There is nothing wrong with that.
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:15 PM
May 2014

You don't know who else was in the room, you don't know the context, you know NOTHING about it beyond a snapshot. You have a sick mind.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
186. He doesn't appear to have much on in the way of pants, either...
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:03 PM
May 2014

That said, I'm not sure this is a situation that's anyone's business outside that of the Smith family.

Willow is 13. She probably has a crush on this guy. Maybe more...



Moises Arias is a long-time family friend of the Smiths. If anything beyond a friendship has transpired between Willow and Moises, I would suspect that Will and Jada already know about it and have counseled their daughter accordingly.

Whatever the intimacy level between Willow and Moises, I highly doubt that the kid is stupid enough to rape the daughter of one of Hollywood's most powerful families.

To imply that Will and Jada Pinkett Smith don't know what goes on with their daughter is to suggest that they are either too stupid, or too self-absorbed to care about Willow's welfare. For anyone paying attention, the history of this family tells quite a different story.

Willow Smith is an extremely independent individual and I choose to respect her autonomy. Yes, she's 'only' 13, but she's vibrant, creative and very talented; her energy shines and it does so within the purview and close management of her parents.

The idea that she might be enamored with a 20-year-old friend of the family isn't really a stretch to imagine. I trust her parents to guide her through the hormone years. If Moises is a threat to Willow... if he's a predator and Willow has suffered in any way for it, I wouldn't want to be him.

It's clear that Will and Jada love and protect their children. The details should be left up to Jada and Will...and Willow.

I think they've got this!

TYY

sendero

(28,552 posts)
198. I'm here posting because..
Thu May 8, 2014, 09:35 PM
May 2014

.... this fucking idiotic thread won't go the fuck away. It's absolutely pathetic to give two shits about what some random kid does.

herding cats

(19,558 posts)
205. I don't get what's wrong with the photos
Fri May 9, 2014, 02:35 PM
May 2014

To me they look like candid shots of people hanging out. I don't see anything sexual in them. There's no contact between the two or anything sexy about the photos.

What I do have a problem with is people saying these photos somehow make Willow a slut, or that she's going to become a slut. Where did that come from?

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
207. People who jumped to sexual conclusions about the photo have SICK minds.
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:14 PM
May 2014

Geez man. I thought I'd seen it all. Though I don't recall being shirtless (mainly because being so skinny, I wasn't comfortable being shirtless), I can't count how many times I've been in similar situations when I was young teenager-young 20 something guy, hanging out with my best friends who had little sisters and little brothers. They'd come in and hang out while we were doing whatever. I'm almost certain I've even been on the same bed with girls just as young when I was probably just as old, watching tv, with my friend sitting on a chair or in the floor or something. Its not a big deal.

Come to think of it, my wife's sister who is 15 years younger than me has probably sat on the same bed or couch that I was on, wearing pajamas and such. Its completely innocent. There was nothing sexual about it.

People need to get their minds out of the gutter and stop jumping to conclusions.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
213. I agree 100%
Fri May 9, 2014, 05:37 PM
May 2014

Is this Democratic Underground or Perverted Minds Underground? This thread is a real eye opener. In a very sad way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»13-Year-Old Willow Smith ...