General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFCC chairman will revise broadband proposal - ISPs will not be able to segregate web traffic.
http://www.cnet.com/news/fcc-chairman-will-reportedly-revise-broadband-proposal/FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler is expected to reveal the new proposal as early as Monday, the Journal reported. The rules revision is an apparent attempt to quell concern that broadband providers will be allowed to degrade traffic speeds to some sites while allowing other sites to strike deals that assure preferential delivery of their web content to customers.
While not a dramatic revision of Wheeler's proposal, the new draft is expected to include language that will allow the FCC to ensure that broadband providers don't degrade the traffic of nonpaying customers. The new proposal will also seek comment on whether such "paid prioritization" should be prohibited altogether.
The commission's proposed plan ignited a frenzy of criticism on the Internet last month after being spotlighted in news reports. The reports suggested that the FCC had changed its position on certain aspects of its Open Internet rules, including shifting its stance to allow Internet service providers to charge companies for a faster lane of service.
Top tech titans join forces to ask FCC to protect Net neutrality
Franken says FCC Net neutrality proposal would "destroy" open Internet
FCC chairman vows to keep Internet an 'open pathway'
The redrafting comes just days after the world's top tech heavyweights made a plea to the FCC to lay down the law and safeguard Net neutrality, which traditionally has prohibited blocking access or discriminating against Internet traffic traveling over an ISP's connections. Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Yahoo, eBay, and dozens of others wrote a letter (PDF) to the FCC on Wednesday asking for a "free and open Internet" and rules that protect users and Internet companies. In all, nearly 150 Internet companies signed the letter.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)"Paid prioritization" does exactly that; it creates a "fast lane" for internet traffic, and of course all other traffic will be in the "slow lane" relative to it. Any claims otherwise are absurd.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)If this is the carrot that gets telcos to run more fiber, I'm on the fence about whether it's worth it or not.
Newsjock
(11,733 posts)But you can offer a "cash discount."
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)From a really smart DUer.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)regulation in its effects, then this won't be upheld.
It's an interesting attempt to split the difference, though from what I'm seeing it sounds dangerously close to a "worst of both worlds" result...
msongs
(67,360 posts)PSPS
(13,579 posts)Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)He's still planning on killing net neutrality, the impetus that's provided numerous innovations.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Again.
IN YOUR FACE Orwellian garbage. If people don't like your assaults, just ADVERTISE that you aren't doing what you continue to do.
Utter contempt for the public.
Hope and Change, my ass.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)use any means possible to scuttle an open internet, it's a major threat to their business mode of greed and subservient masses.