Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,501 posts)
Tue May 13, 2014, 10:56 PM May 2014

Christie spokesman says he believed traffic closures were for traffic study, was told of staffer rol

Christie spokesman says he believed traffic closures were for traffic study, was told of staffer role

by Jed Lewison at Daily Kos

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/13/1299100/-Christie-spokesman-says-he-believed-lane-closures-were-for-traffic-study-was-told-of-staffer-role

"SNIP....................


So, according to Drewniak's testimony, the governor's office had been told about the involvement of of administration staffers but didn't think anything improper had happened because they assumed Democrats were simply being partisan. Not only that, but Drewniak acknowledges that Wildstein said he was involved—and that he claimed to have told Christie of his involvement, a conversation that Christie says he doesn't remember.

According to Drewniak, none of that really matters, because even if the Christie administration did know more about what was happening than they originally acknowledged, they thought they were victims of partisan Democrats trying to exploit a traffic study. But if it was just a little traffic study, why would Wildstein have bothered to mention it to Christie while it was happening? Oh, right: Christie can't remember if Wildstein ever talked to him about it, so he doesn't need to answer that question. How convenient.

Drewniak's bottom line is that while it's true that there may have been more awareness inside the governor's office of what was going on than previously acknowledged, the important thing is that they failed to understand recognize that anything improper was taking place, so therefore they did nothing wrong. If you find it implausible that the governor's office could have been aware that administration staffers were involved in the lane closures without also recognizing that their staffers were up to no good, the only evidence Drewniak offers to convince you is this:


“Nobody would mock something as egregious as we now know transpired,” he said. “This governor — and none of the people around him — would never make a mockery of something so abusive on its face.”



...................SNIP"
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Christie spokesman says h...