General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRIP Social Conservatism: Why It's Dying - and the Coming Realignment
Does this mean the end of the current Democratic Party coalition?
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/23718-rip-social-conservatism-why-its-dying-and-the-coming-realignment
If social liberal attitudes become nearly universal, then todays conservatism and todays populism vanish or become marginalized. A four-fold division of the American electorate would be replaced by a simpler binary opposition. In an America which, a generation or two hence, practically everyone is a social liberal, there would be two socially liberal factions that disagree chiefly about economics, even as they share current liberal positions on abortion, gay rights and censorship.
This realignment of attitudes will not happen by 2020, perhaps not even by 2030. But it has already occurred in Britain and most of Europe, where the local conservatives are social liberals, by American standards. By the mid-21st century, a similar situation is likely to obtain on this side of the Atlantic.
One of the consequences I predict is the crack-up of todays Democratic coalition paradoxically, as a direct consequence of the decline of social conservatism.
At the moment the Democrats are a tenuous coalition of economic progressives and neoliberals or moderate economic conservatives. In their policy views many of the neoliberals, including arguably Barack Obama and the Clintons, are what used to be called Rockefeller Republicans. Many neoliberals favor smaller government, free trade, deregulation and lower taxes and side with the Democrats chiefly because of the religiosity and social conservatism of todays Republicans.
If the threat of religious fundamentalism and social conservatism declines, there is really no reason for the allies of neoliberals like Robert Rubin and the allies of economic progressives like Elizabeth Warren to remain in the same party. This is why, in The Coming Realignment, I predict that the two wings of todays Democrats may evolve into the nuclei of the two national parties of tomorrow, once social conservatism goes the way of segregationism and agrarianism.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)There will always be some issue to galvanize the type of people who are socially conservative. A lot of younger people won't necessarily go backwards on issues as they get older, but they'll certainly get stuck in their ways. So in 50 years when we're still pointing out the injustices (racism, homophobia, the usual) that remain, there will be a decent proportion who claim such problems don't exist while subtly promoting ridiculous thoughts on the state of the oppressed.
Exposethefrauds
(531 posts)Last edited Sun May 18, 2014, 06:52 AM - Edit history (1)
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I think you should probably rethink that.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)One can dream...
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Mostly because the UK, and most of Europe, are socially liberal because they are not very religious. The USA, on the other hand? Is the most religious country in the developed world. Various polls and surveys indicate that around 40% of Americans attend church regularly. In the UK? That's about 5%. 904% of Americans believe in god; in the UK? That's about 50%, or less (and as low as 38%, depending on the poll). The US is becoming less religious, but it has a way to go to catch up to Europe.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Black Protestants, Jew, Mormons and other have stayed pretty constant over generations. White Catholics and both mainline and evangelical Protestants have suffered huge losses, as unaffiliation has increased to 31% of Millennials. Does anyone see this trend reversing itself?