General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou won’t believe this, but some big banks may have broken the law again
Just as markets were digesting the $2.6 billion penalty imposed on Credit Suisse for helping American clients avoid taxes, news from Brussels suggests that yet another big fine is looming for a few other banking giants. Today the European Commission accused JPMorgan, HSBC, and Crédit Agricole with rigging euro interest rates, alleging that they acted in a cartel to manipulate Euribor, a key interbank lending rate.
The three banks refused to settle the antitrust case in December last year, when the commission fined eight other banks and brokers a record 1.7 billion ($2.3 billion) for their roles in the rate-rigging cartel. Settling the case saved the accused 10% of the headline fine, on top of other discounts based on their degree of co-operation with regulators.
JPMorgan, HSBC, and Crédit Agricole must now answer the commissions charges without the offer of leniency that comes from settling. That said, throughout the financial crisis European regulators have been seen as softer than their American counterparts, with Brussels wielding more limited powers and showing less of an appetite to impose big penalties. Even after settling with the EU in last years euro interest rate case, Société Générale is challenging its 446 million fine in court, alleging a manifest error of assessment in calculating it.
The three banks that were charged today will hope to benefit from the eurocrats presumed timidity. In theory, EU cartel fines carry a penalty of up to 10% of a companys global revenue, which would imply a combined fine of more than $18 billion, according to the banks latest annual results.
more
http://qz.com/211455/you-wont-believe-this-but-some-big-banks-may-have-broken-the-law-again/
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Oh wash your brain off with some Ayn Rand balm.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)we Progressives get control of the Senate Banking Committee. Holder is beholden to his old Law Firm and he is not about to piss his buds off at this late stage of his career at the DOJ. Remember this,his Law Partners represent most off or all of the Wall Street Crowd,and,they write most of the rules and regs for the Financial Regulators.
Bottom line,it's all about Party Contributions for the next election cycle. With the latest Roberts Court Ruling,all bets are off. Money is speech and you and I are SCREWED ROYALLY. So,let's get our sorry asses to the polls this year and vote our needs not the 1%ers needs,okay. We can expect zero help from the in the Beltway Dems.
Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)-p
intaglio
(8,170 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)I trust this will be the last time, though.
That we hear of this.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)malaise
(268,933 posts)oh yes I believe!!
bluesbassman
(19,370 posts)Here's the thing that really grinds me: The banking/financial system is already rigged legally to favor the banks and 1%, yet these greedy asswipes continue to break even the laughably lax laws that govern them and the added costs of their greed and market manipulation is ultimately borne on the backs of the rest of us.
These types of crimes must start carrying stiff prison sentences for the individuals involved in addition to monetary penalties if we are ever going to see it end.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)The justice department just simply doesn't give a shit.