General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre you being talked about on Discussionist?
what do you think of that?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)And I don't care.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)....the ridiculous constructed persons they build in order to ridicule DU members,and the lies they tell, and the hatred they spew and the real damage they have done in the name of that loathing? Oh, and "franksolich"'s stupid stories -- rarely have I seen such sappy and self-indulgent writing from someone who seems to be otherwise literate.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Response to uppityperson (Reply #4)
CreekDog This message was self-deleted by its author.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)seriously, apologies
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)over at discussionist as too much drama.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Saw some talk about Prosense there.
There are some DUers saying stuff there because they can't say it here.
One poster called themselves "blue links." I'll never understand the resentment of Prosense's links. Don't click on them.
Cha
(297,123 posts)stupid insults. They're offended by facts so they stick their fingers in their ears and spew out personal attacks.
ProSense
blm
(113,040 posts)after all those years of addiction to 'news' from the propaganda media developed by a Korean cult leader.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's hilarious. People will demand links. Then when someone provides them, it's like complaining about all those blue links!
Cha!
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)because he held up a drawing made by a child of an owl, and how that was a subliminal satanist message.
I decided there was nothing to see there. And not in the typical, "nothing to see here" way.
GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and so are you for showing a picture of it. I guess for the week when the Great Horned Owl visited me and hooted, and I hooted back at it because it was absolutely hilarious to me when it responded, I'm a Satanist, too.
UTUSN
(70,674 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)I am kind of low-key anyway, and I like to keep it that way. I'm not someone people would be gossiping about anyway, just not that "drama queen" type.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I will say I'm having more fun over there than here.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)And there are only two posts there mentioning you that I can find:
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=9886
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=27479
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I know there is a conservative site that we're never supposed to mention that obsessively disects the postings of about 20 DUers, and that other DUers get mentioned now and then.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
~~~Eleanor Roosevelt
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Seems that some are obsessed with DU and DUers.
petronius
(26,602 posts)Note: this is a joke. I have no sockpuppets.
Not anymore, anyway... Damn you, MIRT!
[font size=-2]No, seriously, never had a puppet...[/font]
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Let em talk.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)been back.
cowards, is what i think about it.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Everybody over there?
Things have settled down quite a bit. Many nonDUers thought it was going to be a free for all. The juries told them otherwise. There are some slow learners, but most people get it.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)I served on a jury for a comment about you over there and it got a 7-0 Hide. Let me know if you want a link.
I have spent a total of less that 15 minutes at that place.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i was there the first day participating. by the second it was clear that it was downhill. that was the last time i went over there.
a pm would be great with the results. i love to read jury. i would appreciate.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Like telling a poster who'd never addressed you or even started a thread, she/he "likes to get her pats on the back from the men's group, who needs their approval for worth".
I think many had the idea they could run roughshod over the same posters they try to do it to here, and are disappointed at meeting resistance. You got it handed back to you, and then some ... I haven't seen you post since.
It's like the wild west ...... only better!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Response to polly7 (Reply #47)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
JanMichael
(24,881 posts)I checked. Apparently, I am too boring
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Fla_Democrat
(2,547 posts)The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I check it out it's creepier than the last time I checked it out. If they're dissing you,wear it like a badge of honor,because damn.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)mokawanis
(4,438 posts)One of the things the poster said was that the DU'er should be investigated for possible abuse of her own children. I was pissed off and upset when I read it and I was even more upset when the jury voted 4-3 to leave it alone. If Discussioniust is going to function like that I'm going to quit going there.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Was disappointed that the OP stands.
And I agree that if stuff like that is allowed to stand over there, I'm done.
Response to mokawanis (Reply #46)
Name removed Message auto-removed
boston bean
(36,220 posts)Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Mirt will zap him i'm sure in a few minutes. Mirt is better than raid for kochroaches and other vermin.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And hope it was my alert and your decision that whacks him.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Wow.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)We have/had hard core misogynists here. If discussionist doesn't prove that to everyone reading over there, well then they are a hopeless case. LOL
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)They do like to follow her around -- on this thread even...
One good thing about the Discussionist is that they can get the ISPs of some of the sick stalkers who posted on other sites.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Thanks for helping shut that shit down
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Then after returning to this thread, I saw the second comment that got him/her zotted, so the 3-4 leave on the other post was properly discarded after all.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)These people have anger issues.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Move on, people. Move. On.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)spouting misogynistic bullshit over there. What's that tell ya?
City Lights
(25,171 posts)There are a lot of disgruntled former DUers over there still trying to settle some mythical score.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sad and it makes me throw up in my mouth a bit.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)mokawanis
(4,438 posts)The one I alerted on was voted 4-3 to leave it alone, unfortunately.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Can't believe it wasn't hidden.
That place is a cesspool.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)I see he has been PPRed from DU but is still a member at the Discussionist. Proof of the problem.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cowards.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)and haven't been back.
If anyone over there is actually talking about me and what I post here -- what a waste of their time!
On the other hand, I may be on Ignore by vast numbers of DU members already, given how rarely anything I post gets a comment.
LaurenG
(24,841 posts)They can go for it. Hahaha.
Skittles
(153,142 posts)that's what I think
Lex
(34,108 posts)hunter
(38,309 posts).
.
.
.
.
.
ancianita
(36,017 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)to be talked about.
drm604
(16,230 posts)I'm just not that prominent here. I was more prominent on the old DU with my research into Republican IT guru Michael Connell and his companies' possible involvement in the tallying of votes in the 2008 election, but that's old news and I'm pretty much a nobody on here these days.