Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:08 AM May 2014

Heard on the radio this morning that snowy said the NSA are tapping your phones when they are off

Powered off...LOL...

Did he really say that? He didn't did he, tell me he didn't


I've been in telecom over 20 years now and this low level IT DBA really should spend more time on the googles finding out how phone networks actually work. I wish somebody would ask him some basic questions. Maybe like, Hey Snowy, what is the difference between CDMA and 4G? How does the NSA get around SRTP encapsulated in a private MPLS VPN? Yo Snowy, for $100 what is Quantico?


BONUS QUESTION! without looking it up with your android, how does this work! Don't just read it and say it is a tap, tell me, how does it work and would you consider it a passive or active device! Fucking Snowy

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heard on the radio this morning that snowy said the NSA are tapping your phones when they are off (Original Post) snooper2 May 2014 OP
Step 1: Don't watch interview DesMoinesDem May 2014 #1
so did he say it or not? I was a little busy getting three GIGE cut to a new co-lo snooper2 May 2014 #3
Why don't you watch the interview and find out what he said DesMoinesDem May 2014 #4
I prefer for you to answer my direct question, PLEASE! I heard it on the radio snooper2 May 2014 #7
So you prefer to be ignorant. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #8
sure nailed me LOL, I'm sure I'll learn something new today, Ciena guys are here again snooper2 May 2014 #10
Ignorance is bliss. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #11
The Ciena FutureLab doesn't list any stop for today. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #18
You want me to take a picture LOL snooper2 May 2014 #20
Yep. Where are you? DesMoinesDem May 2014 #21
you want a street address :), in DFW area snooper2 May 2014 #23
This truck lists its stops publicly. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #25
PM me your phone number I'll send you at picture :) snooper2 May 2014 #26
No, I'm not going to give my phone number to a random person on the internet. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #27
FINE! snooper2 May 2014 #30
OK, I'll believe it. DesMoinesDem May 2014 #34
You prefer obfuscations, the affirming question is valid ... baselining is normal conversation uponit7771 May 2014 #33
The FBI was doing this in 2006. Why wouldn't the NSA be doing the same now? DisgustipatedinCA May 2014 #2
Well, I've actaully tested CALEA functionality with Quantico as part of my job snooper2 May 2014 #5
Your OP insinuates that it's not technically feasible to tap a powered off cell phone DisgustipatedinCA May 2014 #9
I guess "tap" has a different meaning to Snowy than I have snooper2 May 2014 #12
I know you already know this, but I'll post it anyway. DisgustipatedinCA May 2014 #13
No response to this post I see tkmorris May 2014 #28
You are correct ROFL snooper2 May 2014 #32
I think the difference lies in the fact that the FBI or whomever has to turn the phone on before it okaawhatever May 2014 #29
Exactly hootinholler May 2014 #14
And they can watch us on our webcam with the computer turned off! yallerdawg May 2014 #6
Whoever said Snowden said they could tap the phone when it was off... Swede Atlanta May 2014 #15
You could monitor traffic sources trying to call you. n/t PowerToThePeople May 2014 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #19
Just like your TV is never really off, just running at a very low voltage. CK_John May 2014 #22
Subliminally broadcasting? yallerdawg May 2014 #24
Right. Just like they're not watching you on your camera when it is "off." Oh, but they are. dballance May 2014 #31
police can track em when they are off 2pooped2pop May 2014 #35
tracking a phone is different from tapping a phone snooper2 May 2014 #36
 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
1. Step 1: Don't watch interview
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:11 AM
May 2014

Step 2: Make a fool of yourself on a discussion forum.
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit!

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
3. so did he say it or not? I was a little busy getting three GIGE cut to a new co-lo
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:13 AM
May 2014

I wonder if Snowy ever even touched a piece of fiber?

Another good question for him! Explain Singlemode vs. Multimode fiber!

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
4. Why don't you watch the interview and find out what he said
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:16 AM
May 2014

instead of starting a thread on something you are completely ignorant of? Do you always prefer to remain ignorant?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
7. I prefer for you to answer my direct question, PLEASE! I heard it on the radio
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:18 AM
May 2014

so it must be true right!

Radio > Intertubes

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
10. sure nailed me LOL, I'm sure I'll learn something new today, Ciena guys are here again
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:25 AM
May 2014

We have a lot of their gear in our netowrk but they always have new cool toys...

When I pulled up I got to see this taking up 20 parking spaces in the parking lot



 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
23. you want a street address :), in DFW area
Thu May 29, 2014, 12:08 PM
May 2014

FYI,

Vendors usually don't announce to the World when they are visiting their customers

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
26. PM me your phone number I'll send you at picture :)
Thu May 29, 2014, 12:30 PM
May 2014

They have our name splashed on the side so I took a picture from the front angle...

Bad ass rig by the way

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
2. The FBI was doing this in 2006. Why wouldn't the NSA be doing the same now?
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:11 AM
May 2014

You seem to believe you have special knowledge that invalidates Snowden's claims. You do not.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
5. Well, I've actaully tested CALEA functionality with Quantico as part of my job
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:16 AM
May 2014

You know,

When we, a carrier, get an actual warrant signed by a judge and then send JUST that traffic to the feds? Kind of why equipment manufacturers are required to have lawfull intercept capabilities on their gear. Like SONUS, Acme Packet, Siemens, Avaya, etc, etc, etc,

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
9. Your OP insinuates that it's not technically feasible to tap a powered off cell phone
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:21 AM
May 2014

In this reply, you've changed tack and you're talking in legalities. Fine, so long as we've established that cell phones can be tapped when powered off. Of course, this begs the question, what's the point of your OP if not to make fun of Snowden's claims? What did he say that was so worthy of your derision?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
12. I guess "tap" has a different meaning to Snowy than I have
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:30 AM
May 2014

Can I find the location of a cell phone that is powered off, yep-

Can I "tap" into it, not really

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
13. I know you already know this, but I'll post it anyway.
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:33 AM
May 2014

Cell phone users, beware. The FBI can listen to everything you say, even when the cell phone is turned off. A recent court ruling in a case against the Genovese crime family revealed that the FBI has the ability from a remote location to activate a cell phone and turn its microphone into a listening device that transmits to an FBI listening post, a method known as a "roving bug." Experts say the only way to defeat it is to remove the cell phone battery. "The FBI can access cell phones and modify them remotely without ever having to physically handle them," James Atkinson, a counterintelligence security consultant, told ABC News. "Any recently manufactured cell phone has a built-in tracking device, which can allow eavesdroppers to pinpoint someone’s location to within just a few feet," he added. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You’re Calling FBI Secret Probes: 3,501 Targets in the U.S. Click Here to Check Out the Latest Brian Ross Investigates Webcast on CIA Secret Prisons According to the recent court ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, "The device functioned whether the phone was powered on or off, intercepting conversations within its range wherever it happened to be."

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2006/12/can_you_hear_me/

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
29. I think the difference lies in the fact that the FBI or whomever has to turn the phone on before it
Thu May 29, 2014, 12:37 PM
May 2014

can "bug" anyone. It seems like both Snowden and the ABC article don't necessarily explain that. They say

... from a remote location to activate a cell phone and turn its microphone into a listening device that transmits to an FBI list


What Snooper2 heard on the radio sounded like Snowden was saying the FBI could listen while your phone was off. They can turn it on and then listen with a warrant. That is why you see all the criminals in the movies take out the battery.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
14. Exactly
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:35 AM
May 2014

Plus I don't think Snowden was a DBA low level or otherwise. He was a sysadmin which is what gave him access to many things that would otherwise have been stovepiped.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
6. And they can watch us on our webcam with the computer turned off!
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:16 AM
May 2014

Oh wait, that's just total strangers on the internet.

I'm sure the NSA doesn't have this technology or did Snowden mention it?

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
15. Whoever said Snowden said they could tap the phone when it was off...
Thu May 29, 2014, 11:35 AM
May 2014

was not reporting what Snowden said.

Again, you really should listen/watch the interview so you have first hand information rather than relying on a sound byte on a radio. Didn't you ever play the game as a child where you had 4 people and the first person would tell the 2nd person a single sentence and then at the end have the 4th person say what they thought the first person said? The differences are startling.

What Snowden actually said was that not only the NSA but also other intelligence agencies have the ability to turn on a targeted cell phone and once it is on the ability to engage the camera and/or microphone. He did NOT say they could use the camera and/or microphone with the phone turned off.

I think anyone knows if the device isn't even booted up and running none of the peripherals or applications would work.

Whether or not that is the case I don't know. I obviously care but I don't know.

But either you incorrectly reported what you heard on the radio or the person on the radio incorrectly reported what Mr. Snowden (his name is not Snowy) said.

I thank God for Snowden and his like to expose the lawless nature of our government.

Response to snooper2 (Original post)

Response to snooper2 (Original post)

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
31. Right. Just like they're not watching you on your camera when it is "off." Oh, but they are.
Thu May 29, 2014, 12:46 PM
May 2014

You are so wrong. Phones that are powered "off" still have a battery in them servicing functions like keeping track of time. Keeping track of the GPS of your phone is also rather common when a device is "off." Off doesn't quite mean today what it used to mean.

Perhaps you should disclose your professional "title" in comparison with the "low-level DBA" if you wish to actually make a point based on facts and not your opinion and just being generally disparaging to DBAs.

Perhaps you have some extensive background in telecom on the back end. You have not provided your credentials that make you an expert on cellular. Probably because you used all the acronyms you know in your rant and were out of knowledge beyond those. I'm not easily fooled by technical talk.

"How does the NSA get around SRTP encapsulated in a private MPLS VPN?" Wow, nice use of terms that almost no one can understand in your rant where you try to look educated and professional. If you really cared about making your argument convincing you would not have resorted to industry terms no one outside the industry can understand. You would have presented facts in the most understandable way. How does the NSA get around encryption? I think given the recent articles on the HeartBleed weaknesses in OpenSSL are a pretty good guide to how the NSA, and more concering others, can exploit weaknesses in supposedly secure systems.

It disgusts me that people use acronyms that no one can understand in their arguments in support of a position in order to look "smart" or "superior." TALK to PEOPLE if you want to convince them of something.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heard on the radio this m...