Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Thu May 29, 2014, 12:50 PM May 2014

NBC poll on Snowden totally flipped since yesterday.

NBC asked yesterday if Snowden was a patriot or a traitor, and the numbers favored traitor.

Today, 60 percent say patriot, 40 percent say traitor.

So, it appears that most viewers did find him to be sincere and authentic and appreciated his risk-taking and his motives.

Score one for civil liberties!

Being on the right side of history is evident.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NBC poll on Snowden totally flipped since yesterday. (Original Post) grasswire May 2014 OP
He's a Traitriot™ Capt. Obvious May 2014 #1
your name really suits you Skittles May 2014 #6
Most viewers watch reality shows. Whisp May 2014 #2
Link? The last thing I saw was this from NBC ProSense May 2014 #3
Relax, ProSense Jack Rabbit May 2014 #19
It's not even an NBC poll, it was totally mischaracterized by the OP here. George II May 2014 #28
Ah, the Twitter battle ProSense May 2014 #4
So he shouldn't be afraid to leave Moscow for Progressive dog May 2014 #5
It's not the public think4yourself May 2014 #7
please educate yourself on justice under the charges he faces. grasswire May 2014 #9
hehehehe good 1 nt Leme May 2014 #16
If you believe he'd actually get a fair trial... Dopers_Greed May 2014 #20
A Twitter hashtag poll? MohRokTah May 2014 #8
yak it up grasswire May 2014 #10
HA! MohRokTah May 2014 #11
nah, just the traitor worshiping on DU... uponit7771 May 2014 #13
as an American, I resent your un-American characterization. grasswire May 2014 #15
Would it be better rtracey May 2014 #22
it would be better for him, yes grasswire May 2014 #27
You might not like the way he did it but you have to like the Beltway talking about privacy rights. Spitfire of ATJ May 2014 #12
absolutely grasswire May 2014 #14
It's like how Occupy got the 1% on the Beltway radar. Spitfire of ATJ May 2014 #39
yes grasswire May 2014 #41
Wow, Spitfire. Maedhros May 2014 #34
I haven't really gotten into the bickering. Just the issue. Spitfire of ATJ May 2014 #38
I'm trying to extricate myself from the bickering, hence the ignore list. [n/t] Maedhros May 2014 #40
K & R !!! WillyT May 2014 #17
He is anything *but* sincere and authentic, sadly. AverageJoe90 May 2014 #18
Talking about facades? erronis May 2014 #21
LOL, keep acting like he changed nothing. nt Logical May 2014 #23
where was everybody in 2006 under BUSH when we LEARNED THIS 1ST? pansypoo53219 May 2014 #24
sorry, but that is yesterday's talking point. nt grasswire May 2014 #32
You say that as if we're wasting our time discussing blanket surveillance, Maedhros May 2014 #35
Quite a number of us were against it then, too gratuitous May 2014 #42
I am in the 60 percent riverbendviewgal May 2014 #25
sure grasswire May 2014 #31
It's not an "NBC" poll, it's a poll on the Cleveland NBC affiliate's website... George II May 2014 #26
no, you are wrong grasswire May 2014 #29
I can't find that one anywhere, but I see that many of their affiliates are conducting their own... George II May 2014 #33
I think that's actually pretty sad. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #30
It's not real until it's on TV [n/t] Maedhros May 2014 #36
half empty half full cup when measuring public interest/concern carolinayellowdog May 2014 #37
K&R woo me with science May 2014 #43
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
2. Most viewers watch reality shows.
Thu May 29, 2014, 01:04 PM
May 2014

So I guess in that respect I can understand that Snowden, acting like he was genuine, passed.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. Link? The last thing I saw was this from NBC
Thu May 29, 2014, 01:06 PM
May 2014

"when the broadcast ended, there were at least 4,435 references on Twitter describing Snowden as a patriot, and at least 4,084"

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
19. Relax, ProSense
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:08 PM
May 2014

It's not a scientific poll.

Now you can make a lengthy OP about it to that effect that you can reference later when somebody dares to praise Snowden and Greenwald for their work or dares to call this kind of mass surveillance a police state tactic so that you can whip that poster with a red herring.

Progressive dog

(6,899 posts)
5. So he shouldn't be afraid to leave Moscow for
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:04 PM
May 2014

the USA and stand trial before a jury with 60% already believing he's a Patriot.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
9. please educate yourself on justice under the charges he faces.
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:51 PM
May 2014

Public opinion has nothing to do with the rules that stifle a defense.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
8. A Twitter hashtag poll?
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:46 PM
May 2014

Holding that up as an example of public opinion is about as logical as holding up a poll on DU as to what the American people want.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
11. HA!
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:53 PM
May 2014

I'm not the one pulling a twitter hashtag poll out to demonstrate how patriotic the criminal is. Seems like a move of desperation for somebody who has been demonstrated to be wrong about their opinion of their hero.

HA! times 100.











grasswire

(50,130 posts)
15. as an American, I resent your un-American characterization.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:02 PM
May 2014

In my America, the presumption of innocence still prevails.

Your opinion of Snowden does not make him guilty of the charge against him....which is espionage, not treason.

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
22. Would it be better
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:27 PM
May 2014

Would it be better if the government charged him with theft? I am zzzzzzzzzz out on the traitor, patriot thing....whatever he is, he IS a thief.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
27. it would be better for him, yes
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:39 PM
May 2014

But only as a matter of degree.

The administration would NEVER allow Snowden in an open court trial under federal rules of evidence. NEVER. It would be a huge risk for the government.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
14. absolutely
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:59 PM
May 2014

Snowden has achieved his goal: starting a national conversation about surveillance.

Whatever happens, he has done what he set out to do, at great risk to himself.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
34. Wow, Spitfire.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:51 PM
May 2014

Yours is the first response showing (to me), and it's #12.

My ignore list is working overtime. The Swarm, indeed.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
18. He is anything *but* sincere and authentic, sadly.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:07 PM
May 2014

And I find it unfortunate, that people are still falling for this facade he puts up.

No offense towards you, OP, but John Kerry was right. Snowden needs to come home and face the music.

erronis

(15,185 posts)
21. Talking about facades?
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:22 PM
May 2014

Is there anything that the US Gov (or any other) presents that isn't a facade?

Did we hack the Chinese before they did us? Did the KGB infiltrate the CIA before we did the same?

Unfortunately the public is best served by first listening to any pronouncements from a government (US/other), analyzing for rationale, and then perhaps, evaluating content.

Kerry has become another mouthpiece of the apparatus. I had hopes for this set of executives but think they have been bought out (and I wonder what type of cash is used.)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
35. You say that as if we're wasting our time discussing blanket surveillance,
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:54 PM
May 2014

the national security state and NSA abuses.

By your logic, we knew about Monsanto and GMO crops in the 90's so what's the big deal?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
42. Quite a number of us were against it then, too
Thu May 29, 2014, 04:21 PM
May 2014

Can you elaborate on what your question means? Are you saying that because you haven't found anyone objecting to revelations of domestic spying under Bush eight years ago (Have you looked for those posts?) that objections now are irrelevant? Or that those objecting now prefer Bush to Obama? Or that it was very wrong under Bush but only sort of wrong under Obama?

I've posted for years about my unfortunate attachment to the superannuated language of our quaint old Constitution, and my inability to trim my ideals to fit this year's (or this administration's) fashion. I seem to recall that one candidate campaigned vigorously in 2008 on a message of "change," but eight years later, we find that in many areas very little has changed. Does that bother you?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
31. sure
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:44 PM
May 2014

I think if you google Snowden Williams NBC you'll find a link to the interview. It's really worth watching.

And a big fat hello to you, eh.

George II

(67,782 posts)
26. It's not an "NBC" poll, it's a poll on the Cleveland NBC affiliate's website...
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:38 PM
May 2014

...and one has to "log in" in order to vote. That's probably why they've gotten less than 3000 votes.

VERY unscientific.

Why did you misrepresent this "poll"?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
29. no, you are wrong
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:42 PM
May 2014

each affiliate has its own poll; there's one going on here in my town.

The numbers announced by NBC are a twitter aggregate. hashtag "Patriot" or hashtag "Traitor". That is the genesis of the ~60-40 response. About 10,000 respondents.

It's not a scientific poll, either way. It's a snapshot indication.

George II

(67,782 posts)
33. I can't find that one anywhere, but I see that many of their affiliates are conducting their own...
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:50 PM
May 2014

...the Cleveland poll came up first on Google.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
30. I think that's actually pretty sad.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:43 PM
May 2014

It shows how shallowly the public is actually following current events, that they can flip their opinion on a dime, given a single TV show. If people had been paying attention all along, you'd have thought they'd have been upset at being spied on all along.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
37. half empty half full cup when measuring public interest/concern
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:58 PM
May 2014

It is scary to think how anesthetized people are by usual media fare, that they haven't much cared what is being done in terms of surveillance now, or how it all goes back to the Bushes and 9/11. But it is encouraging that the American public, after being propagandized by both parties' leaders to hate Snowden, could wake up as much as they did overnight. Almost 6 million watched. TV still has a major role in a healthy democracy that neither print media nor the Internet can match, and the Snowden interview will be remembered for decades.

Kerry did not come across well at all, by contrast to Snowden, which I think contributed to this flip in public opinion. Other polls will tell us more about the impact of the interview.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NBC poll on Snowden total...