Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:55 PM Jul 2014

So the problem is Plan B and not necessarily all birth control?

From Hobby Lobby:
The Green family has no moral objection to the use of 16 of 20 preventive contraceptives required in the mandate, and Hobby Lobby will continue its longstanding practice of covering these preventive contraceptives for its employees. However, the Green family cannot provide or pay for four potentially life-threatening drugs and devices. These drugs include Plan B and Ella, the so-called morning-after pill and the week-after pill. Covering these drugs and devices would violate their deeply held religious belief that life begins at the moment of conception, when an egg is fertilized.


So normal preventative birth control pills are still covered...the only thing not covered is things like Plan B? Is that correct?

I know there is the issue of whether Plan B should be covered. But the media is sort of making it out to seem that Hobby Lobby wont provide ANY birth control, but it seems that they do.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the problem is Plan B and not necessarily all birth control? (Original Post) davidn3600 Jul 2014 OP
WRONG! The courts decision give religious exceptions for all contraception. nt boston bean Jul 2014 #1
+1 JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #26
No, so delete this ridiculous OP and read up already. It is ALL birth control and as many companies bettyellen Jul 2014 #2
Those supplying the "it ain't so bad" spin are out in force today. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #5
and none of them are surprises. BainsBane Jul 2014 #19
Amen BB JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #27
It's crazy. Almost every hour a new thread with the same spin riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #22
The OP was just asking for clarification. savalez Jul 2014 #29
Sorry...SCOTUS confirmed today that it is ALL Roselma Jul 2014 #3
Wow. That effen "narrow" ruling got WIDE quick. savalez Jul 2014 #30
For Hobby Lobby, it's Plan B and the IUD. Brickbat Jul 2014 #4
WRONG. It is ALL BIRTH CONTROL. you're welcome. bettyellen Jul 2014 #7
I do believe you're blasting someone who is on your side. DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2014 #9
Nope, Hobby Lobby is now allowed to exempt all birth control- as are hundreds of other bettyellen Jul 2014 #13
correct on all counts DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2014 #16
that's "the problem" with this decison- not this BS that HL's PR firm is now pushing. bettyellen Jul 2014 #21
Wrong. They are going after ALL bc. There was clarification today from the Court. Hekate Jul 2014 #6
There are two different things here. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #8
That's sort of my point that SCOTUS went beyond what Hobby Lobby was asking for davidn3600 Jul 2014 #11
If someone in the media is saying Hobby Lobby won't cover any birth control, ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #14
if they are saying HL doesn't have to cover any birth control- that is truer in terms of what the bettyellen Jul 2014 #15
The people who own Hobby Lobby are theocrats, plain and simple. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #17
That's HL's ridiculous attempt at damage control. bluesbassman Jul 2014 #10
Please read these articles here... countryjake Jul 2014 #12
It is important to not this isn't about Hobbby Lobby and IUDs/ Plan B etherealtruth Jul 2014 #18
Then we should have went for a single payer system davidn3600 Jul 2014 #23
you are "preaching to the choir" etherealtruth Jul 2014 #25
HL is also against IUDs which are prescribed for other medical conditions riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #20
Here we go again TBF Jul 2014 #24
THE PROBLEM IS that SCOTUS legally recognizes (1) corporations have religious beliefs and valerief Jul 2014 #28
Read this: Ilsa Jul 2014 #31
It's hard to corroborate savalez Jul 2014 #32
Regardless... hamsterjill Jul 2014 #33
That's not really the point, David. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #34
No. IUD (sans hormones) can also be excluded MerryBlooms Jul 2014 #35
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
2. No, so delete this ridiculous OP and read up already. It is ALL birth control and as many companies
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:57 PM
Jul 2014

as feel like claiming a religious exemption. Jeeze.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
5. Those supplying the "it ain't so bad" spin are out in force today.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jul 2014

The GOPidiots must realize that women won't stand for this bullshit.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
22. It's crazy. Almost every hour a new thread with the same spin
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:42 PM
Jul 2014

"Its not so bad"....

I'm almost at the point of copying and pasting my same response. ..



Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
4. For Hobby Lobby, it's Plan B and the IUD.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jul 2014

The IUD is indicated for ailments other than contraception, so if your doctor recommends it and you work at Hobby Lobby, you're out of luck.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
9. I do believe you're blasting someone who is on your side.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:06 PM
Jul 2014

The operative words are "For Hobby Lobby...". You're correct about the USSC. The other poster is correct about Hobby Lobby. It doesn't change the fact that HL are scumbags who need to go out of business. It doesn't change the fact that several Supreme Court justices need to be impeached (but never will be). But it does mean that "for Hobby Lobby", they plan to cover 16 of the 20 contraceptives on their plan. I posted this because you seemed to be snapping at someone for no good reason. Thanks.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
13. Nope, Hobby Lobby is now allowed to exempt all birth control- as are hundreds of other
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jul 2014

corporations. What they will do with that new found power, none of us can be sure. We are upset about this ruling, and that is what the ruling is.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
16. correct on all counts
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:22 PM
Jul 2014

There's nothing to stop Hobby Lobby from axing the other 16 contraceptives--they have their permission slip from the USSC. But as of now, HL's entire PR campaign (and future profits) rests on their "but we cover 16" claim.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
21. that's "the problem" with this decison- not this BS that HL's PR firm is now pushing.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:39 PM
Jul 2014

I don't give a damn if they relent and cover all of it, they allowed themselves to be used as pawns to punish women for having sex. There is no walking back that decision, they get no pat on the back for allowing BC pills.

Hekate

(90,642 posts)
6. Wrong. They are going after ALL bc. There was clarification today from the Court.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jul 2014

This has been in the works a long long time.

Unlike Democrats/progressives, who have the attention span of a gnat, theocrats take a very long view because God is on their side.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
8. There are two different things here.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:05 PM
Jul 2014

1) The SCOTUS decision, which is about all birth control.

2) Hobby Lobby, which doesn't want to provide birth control they falsely believe causes abortion.

Hobby Lobby says they still intend to cover 16 out of the 20 birth control options under ACA, but the Supreme Court says they don't even have to do that.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
11. That's sort of my point that SCOTUS went beyond what Hobby Lobby was asking for
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:10 PM
Jul 2014

Hobby Lobby says they will continue to support coverage for the preventative forms of birth control. So for the media to say HL won't support any birth control is a bit dishonest.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
14. If someone in the media is saying Hobby Lobby won't cover any birth control,
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:15 PM
Jul 2014

then that person either has information I don't have, that person is mistaken, or that person is being dishonest.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
15. if they are saying HL doesn't have to cover any birth control- that is truer in terms of what the
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:18 PM
Jul 2014

decision means to american women. So there's that.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
17. The people who own Hobby Lobby are theocrats, plain and simple.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jul 2014

I don't trust people like that even as far as I can throw them.

bluesbassman

(19,370 posts)
10. That's HL's ridiculous attempt at damage control.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:09 PM
Jul 2014

IF one takes everything at face value, and that the Green family truly believes the nonsense that conception begins at fertilization, it still doesn't resolve the fact that this decision is wrong on multiple levels that it has immediate and long term extremely negative ramifications.

It boils down to this: They want their cake and eat it too. They incorporated Hobby Lobby to gain the protection of civil (and tax) laws and benefits, but they want to subject their employees (specifically women) to their brand of religion and the SCOTUS just approved it. This is a precedent setting decision no matter how Alito tried to weasel word out of it, and the long term effects are counter to what we as a secular society should be striving for.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
18. It is important to not this isn't about Hobbby Lobby and IUDs/ Plan B
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:27 PM
Jul 2014

This is about all closely held companies (Koch Industries is one) being able to opt out of providing coverage for anything that conflicts with their beliefs (it was news to me that a privately held for profit company could even have beliefs).

I have a sick feeling that the precedent set in this ruling will extend beyond birth control, will extend beyond health benefits and will extend into areas we cannot even imagine at this point.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
23. Then we should have went for a single payer system
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:55 PM
Jul 2014

Instead we are sticking with the employer-provided health insurance system.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
25. you are "preaching to the choir"
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jul 2014

That is what I have wanted all along ... unfortunately, we have half the country that is fearful someone they consider "undeserving" will receive healthcare.

I want health care ... not health insurance

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
20. HL is also against IUDs which are prescribed for other medical conditions
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:39 PM
Jul 2014

So to suggest that this ruling isn't " so" bad because HL covers other birth control completely misses the point.

The Supremes have just said that corporations are now legally justified getting it in between a woman and her doctor because of the boss's religion.

That's the shitty part.

Its not that HL is "only" meddling with some. Its that corporations are now free to meddle with any.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
28. THE PROBLEM IS that SCOTUS legally recognizes (1) corporations have religious beliefs and
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jul 2014

(2) those religious beliefs of corporate non-human entities trump federal law, in this case federal law affecting female humans.

In other words, corporations are persons, female humans are not.

THAT is what's wrong. Not HL's suit or its damning hypocrisy. Our legal system failed us once again. Our legal system is a SHAM, nothing but a high-priced whorehouse.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
31. Read this:
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:50 PM
Jul 2014
The Supreme Court on Tuesday confirmed that its decision a day earlier extending religious rights to closely held corporations applies broadly to the contraceptive coverage requirement in the new health care law, not just the handful of methods the justices considered in their ruling. 

The justices did not comment in leaving in place lower court rulings in favor of businesses that object to covering all 20 methods of government-approved contraception. 

The justices also ordered lower courts that ruled in favor of the Obama administration to reconsider those decisions in light of Monday's 5-4 decision. 



http://m.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/01/1310918/-Supreme-Court-clarifies-Yes-Hobby-Lobby-is-about-all-slut-pills 

The justices have declared that your religious bosses can decide that they don't want to follow the mandates of the ACA with respect to contraception only.

savalez

(3,517 posts)
32. It's hard to corroborate
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:52 PM
Jul 2014

but it seems that yesterday's "narrow" ruling got really WIDE overnight.

Yahoo and TPM have a story on it but I can't seem to find anything else on it as of right now this instant. Perhaps later it'll be all over the place.

MerryBlooms

(11,761 posts)
35. No. IUD (sans hormones) can also be excluded
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:59 PM
Jul 2014

which (tmi) is what I have because of the family breast cancer risk.

You know, we should all be against this ruling, no matter what the health care exclusion. Your healthcare need may be next on the docket. Since this ruling targets women only, it seems easy for some to accept it and dismiss it as no big deal. It's a big fucking deal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So the problem is Plan B ...